Archive

Residents in Upper Burrell are organizing around local rules for a proposed data center. The piece centers on siting and community opposition in a Pennsylvania fracking area, and it does not say the project has secured approvals or committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.

A Michigan survey found residents have strong views about data centers. The piece is about public reaction to proposed data center development, which affects community acceptance and local siting politics rather than a specific power, water, or tax deal.

Xcel Energy is proposing a tariff or billing change meant to keep data center-related power costs from being shifted onto ordinary customers. The piece is about how a utility is handling large-load cost allocation in its service territory, not about a specific project site.

The piece is about a data center project in Shippingport and the local reaction around it as construction begins. It points to siting and community conflict, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project actually carries.

A California firm says it intends to build a data center at Chouteau, Oklahoma. The filing excerpt does not say what land has been assembled, what power or water supply has been arranged, or whether the proposal has local approvals.

A data center developer is seeking to use a former healthcare business site in Pennsylvania for a new project. The filing, as described, only shows a proposed land reuse and does not say what power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project would bring.

A rural Oklahoma town is trying to resist a proposed data center, but the piece says local opposition may not be enough to stop it. The filing, as described, centers on siting and community conflict rather than any firm commitment on power, water, tax, or land terms.

East Whiteland officials adopted a new data center ordinance after residents pushed back against the project already under construction there. The filing is about local land-use control and community opposition; it does not say what the project will draw in power or water, or what tax terms, if any, are attached.

The piece says a Cincinnati member of Congress wants to bar local officials from signing nondisclosure agreements tied to data center deals. That points to the secrecy around siting and incentives, but the excerpt does not say which project is affected or whether any agreement has already been signed.

The headline points to a Senate fight over AI data-center policy, with Democrats split over how to handle it. The excerpt does not say what concrete project, site, utility commitment, or local approval is at issue.

A zoning board action cleared a land sale tied to proposed data center development in Pennsylvania. The filing does not say whether the projects have final financing, power, water, or tax terms, only that the land transaction moved forward.

The story is about how past votes on data center projects are now part of Wisconsin legislative campaigns. It centers on the political fallout for candidates and the public record around local incentives and approvals.

Residents in Monongahela Township are asking for more chances to weigh in on a proposed data center project. The piece is about local opposition and the public process around siting, not about power, water, or incentives.

Southeast Minnesota residents and lawmakers are discussing possible rules around data center development. The piece is about local regulation and community response, not a specific project commitment.

The forum is about how data centers in Nebraska affect electricity use and water demand. It points to a community discussion of project impacts rather than a specific build decision or financing deal.

A proposed $2.9 billion data center in Canton would add a large new load and raise questions about land use, power supply, and water demand for cooling. The excerpt does not say who will build it, where it would go, or what public incentives, utility agreements, or approvals are attached.

The piece reports local and state-level opposition to a proposed data center in South Whitehall, including concern about its proximity to a high school. It is about siting and community pushback, not a built facility or a confirmed commitment of power, water, or tax relief.

Ohio residents are pushing back against data center development, and pro-AI groups are trying to soften that opposition. The piece is about local community resistance and the public campaign around future data center siting in Ohio, not about a specific new project filing or utility commitment.

The story says Ferguson is moving ahead with a data center at the former Emerson site and that the project could receive substantial tax incentives. It centers on a local project, the land reuse, and the public cost through abatements, but the excerpt does not say what infrastructure commitments or local approvals are already in hand.

A local group is organizing a rally against tax breaks and other public incentives for big technology projects. The item points to community pushback over how much the host government is willing to grant, but it does not identify a specific project, host site, or incentive package in the excerpt provided.

A Newark office landlord has energized a 14-megawatt substation and is now marketing the property to data center and finance tenants. The filing does not say whether any data center conversion is approved, whether the building can actually host that load, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would be involved.

Chicago’s mayor is trying to stop data center expansion in the city, framing the issue as a local siting and community fight. The excerpt does not say which project is affected, what formal action the city is taking, or whether any zoning, land-use, power, or water commitments are already on the table.