Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 1 of 1.
A township near Jackson adopted rules that would limit data center noise and water use. The filing does not say whether any specific project is proposed there or how the rules would affect land use, taxes, or power.
QTS is responding to local objections over noise and lighting tied to its proposed large data center project in York County. The filing or reporting shown here centers on community pushback and the company’s attempt to address those concerns, not on water use or any approved project terms.
The piece is about opposition to a proposed data center from neighbors who live near it. The excerpt points to a local conflict over the project’s effects on the surrounding area, especially noise and community impact, but it does not say what the developer has committed on power, water, taxes, or land.
The story is about a Mississippi resident fighting the effects of noise from a data centre site linked to SpaceX and refusing to sell his home. It concerns a local community conflict around an existing or proposed project, with the main issue being noise rather than power, water, or tax terms.
The piece is about xAI in Mississippi paying nearby homeowners to settle noise-related complaints around a data center. It concerns community opposition and a legal pressure point tied to the project, not the company’s general business.
Residents in San Antonio are pushing for stricter rules on data centers because of concerns about water use, power demand, and noise. The piece is about local opposition and possible regulation of future projects, not a specific approved build.
A local data center study group in Walker County is discussing likely community impacts tied to a proposed project, including lighting, noise, and water use. The piece points to early public review rather than a built facility, and it does not say what final commitments, if any, the project will make on power, water, tax, or land.
The filing appears to focus on local siting and community impacts around a proposed data center in Dauphin County. The headline points to road work and noise monitoring, which suggests the project would place some infrastructure burden on the host area, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land deal terms were actually committed.
The piece focuses on residents living near a proposed AI data center in Vineland and the local burdens they say come with it. The excerpt points to community conflict and concerns about noise and water, but it does not lay out the project’s full commitments or any final approvals.
Residents are suing over noise tied to a proposed Southaven data center, which puts the local project’s community impacts and legal fight in view. The excerpt does not say what the filing seeks beyond the noise complaint or what project commitments, if any, were made on power, water, tax, or land.