Archive

Hagerstown officials have not yet set a vote on an annexation tied to a potential data center. The piece is about local land-use and community process, with the project still at the proposal stage.

The piece is about Nevada residents pushing back on a federal permitting bill because they think it could affect data center development and tribal sovereignty. It is about state-level political opposition around siting and regulation, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.

Residents in a central Connecticut suburb are trying to stop data center development before any proposal advances. The piece is about local opposition and the chance of a moratorium or other zoning barrier, not a built project or a committed host site.

The piece is about how local anger over data centers affected Pennsylvania elections and what that political shift could mean for future project approvals and incentives. It centers on community backlash and the tax and policy response rather than a specific new build.

Richland Township approved temporary bans on new data center projects and battery energy storage developments. This is a local siting and zoning move that pauses new proposals while the township decides what it will allow.

Westlake approved the data center after a settlement ended a lawsuit brought by Keller neighbors. The piece is about local opposition and the legal path that cleared the project in Tarrant County.

A school district is moving to take part in a lawsuit involving a data center developer, which makes this a local legal and community dispute tied to a proposed project. The filing excerpt does not say what the project would cost the host, what land or zoning issues are at stake, or what specific claims the district wants to press.

Sacramento utility leaders are criticizing data center projects and asking for stronger protections around how those projects are handled. The piece appears to focus on local oversight and the community impacts tied to power and cooling demands, not on a specific approved build.

Montvale’s proposed data center deal is now facing a court challenge, with the dispute tied to a housing arrangement attached to the project. The piece appears to focus on local land-use and legal conflict around what the town approved or negotiated, rather than on the operator’s technology plans.

Soluna is holding a public open house in Raymondville to promote a proposed second data center in Willacy County. The piece is about local siting and community outreach tied to a possible tax-incentive-backed project, but it does not say the project has been approved or built.

The piece is about a proposed data center site in Salt Lake City and the fact that it could be built next to homes. Based on the headline and excerpt, the community issue is the nearby residential location, while the filing details about power, water, taxes, or land are not spelled out here.

Residents in central Massachusetts are objecting to a proposed data center at a public meeting. The filing as presented does not say whether the project needs a zoning change, tax deal, water service, or power arrangement, only that local opposition is focused on the proposal itself.

A township near Jackson adopted rules that would limit data center noise and water use. The filing does not say whether any specific project is proposed there or how the rules would affect land use, taxes, or power.

The suit is about a data center project in Eagan and a dispute over temporary cooling equipment. It points to a local conflict over how the project is being operated, and it may have implications for municipal oversight or approvals, but the excerpt does not say what relief the city seeks or whether the equipment affects power, water, or land use specifically.

Voters in ten states rejected new data center development in 40 of 41 local ballot measures on November 3, in what trackers call the largest such wave on record.

Voters in ten states rejected new data center development in 40 of 41 local ballot measures on November 3, in what trackers call the largest such wave on record.

The story is about a proposed expansion of a small data center in Milwaukee by the Potawatomi tribe. Based on the headline and excerpt, it does not say what the project would commit the host to in power, water, tax, or land terms, or whether any approvals or financing details have been filed.

A new advocacy group is trying to counter criticism of data centers and frame the industry as secure and American-made. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, site, utility deal, or local approval, so it does not say what any host community is actually taking on.

Raritan is moving toward a local ban on data centers, which makes this a community and zoning story rather than a project approval. The filing does not describe a specific project site, power deal, water use, or tax package.

Grand County is paying for outside help before deciding whether to prohibit data centers. The piece is about local siting rules and the county’s regulatory process, not a specific project’s power, water, or tax commitments.

The story appears to cover local debate over a proposed data center and how a trip to Alabama changed some officials' views. The headline points to public decision-making and likely tax or incentive issues, but it does not state any final commitment of land, power, water, or tax terms.

QTS is responding to local objections over noise and lighting tied to its proposed large data center project in York County. The filing or reporting shown here centers on community pushback and the company’s attempt to address those concerns, not on water use or any approved project terms.