Archive

This piece appears to be about a proposed OpenAI data center near Belmont Glen in Effingham County, Georgia, and the local concerns that come with a new facility next door. The excerpt points to water and cooling as the immediate issue, with the broader project likely affecting nearby residents through land use and community impacts, though the filing details are not provided here.

Spanish Fork changed its zoning to allow a data center in Spanish Fork Canyon, which clears a local land-use step for a proposed project near the existing wind turbines. The filing does not say that the center is approved to build, only that the city opened the door for the request to move forward.

Marion County is weighing a data center proposal and the dispute is about how large the project should be and how much power it would draw. The piece centers on local siting and load concerns, with Virginia used as the comparison point.

The piece is about a defamation dispute tied to opposition to a proposed large data center in Utah. It centers on the public fight around the project, not on the facility’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

A proposed $2.9 billion data center in Canton would add a large new load and raise questions about land use, power supply, and water demand for cooling. The excerpt does not say who will build it, where it would go, or what public incentives, utility agreements, or approvals are attached.

The piece is about proposed AI data center projects in the Inland Northwest and the local effort to deal with them. The excerpt points to water and cooling as part of the issue, but it does not specify a particular project, approval, or utility agreement.

The piece is about a proposed state study of brownfields as possible data center locations in Virginia, and it points to specific sites that could qualify. It concerns siting policy and land reuse, not a committed project or a power, water, or tax package for one named facility.

Ohio residents are pushing back against data center development, and pro-AI groups are trying to soften that opposition. The piece is about local community resistance and the public campaign around future data center siting in Ohio, not about a specific new project filing or utility commitment.

The story says Ferguson is moving ahead with a data center at the former Emerson site and that the project could receive substantial tax incentives. It centers on a local project, the land reuse, and the public cost through abatements, but the excerpt does not say what infrastructure commitments or local approvals are already in hand.

A Newark office landlord has energized a 14-megawatt substation and is now marketing the property to data center and finance tenants. The filing does not say whether any data center conversion is approved, whether the building can actually host that load, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would be involved.

Maryland is reviewing data center proposals through a new state task force. The piece appears to concern how the state will handle siting and public review of future projects, not a specific build commitment yet.

Chicago’s mayor is trying to stop data center expansion in the city, framing the issue as a local siting and community fight. The excerpt does not say which project is affected, what formal action the city is taking, or whether any zoning, land-use, power, or water commitments are already on the table.

Onondaga County says a study on a proposed AI data center is close to done. The filing points to a public process around the project, but it does not spell out a site, a power deal, water use, tax terms, or whether the county will move forward.

A court or other decision has been made on an effort to halt work at a proposed data center site in Cumberland County. The filing and headline indicate a local fight over whether construction can continue, but they do not say what the ruling changed on water, power, tax, or land terms.

Planners in the Lehigh Valley are scrutinizing proposed data center projects in Allentown and Bethlehem. The filing points to local review of where the projects would go and what they may require from the host communities, but it does not say the projects are approved or describe any final commitments on power, water, tax, or land.

Residents in Conneaut are organizing against a possible data center project and want it stopped before it advances further. The piece is about local opposition and early siting uncertainty, not a confirmed build or a disclosed project package.

The piece says Alliance appears to be getting a data center and points readers to the likely site. It is a siting story with a local land-use question for the Ohio community hosting it, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would bring.

The piece is about organized opposition to data center projects in Nebraska and the way that opposition cuts across party lines. It points to a community and siting fight, not a specific project commitment on power, water, or tax terms.

Aberdeen is supplying bulk water to a contractor tied to a data center project in Ellendale. The filing or excerpt does not say how much water is involved, what the cooling setup is, or what terms the contractor is getting.

Residents in Morgan County are pressing the county commission over local frustration tied to proposed data center development. The piece is about community opposition and how local officials are handling it; it does not say the filing committed the host to power, water, tax, or land terms.

A former International Paper site in Natchez is being considered for a data center. The filing or excerpt does not say who the developer is, what the site would require for power or water, or whether there are any approvals, incentives, or local objections.

Buffalo is considering a two-year moratorium on new data centers. The piece is about local siting policy and community pushback, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.