Archive

Soluna is said to be pursuing a large AI data center expansion in Willacy County. The filing or report, as given here, does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments are attached to the project.

Hagerstown officials have not yet set a vote on an annexation tied to a potential data center. The piece is about local land-use and community process, with the project still at the proposal stage.

The piece is about Nevada residents pushing back on a federal permitting bill because they think it could affect data center development and tribal sovereignty. It is about state-level political opposition around siting and regulation, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.

The project is a proposed data center on leased land tied to the LDS Church, and the filing says it is moving ahead. The excerpt does not say whether any tax break, land approval, power deal, water commitment, or local permit has actually been granted.

The piece concerns a proposed data center tied to the Eastern Plains Ranch site in Elbert County, Colorado. It is framed around the site and its water and cooling implications, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project has made on power, water, tax, or land, or what local approvals it has or has not secured.

State lawmakers are pressing New Jersey regulators to deny an air permit for a proposed South Brunswick data center. The filing points to environmental permitting and local opposition around whether the project should move ahead.

Cuyahoga Falls adopted rules that will govern future data center proposals in the city. The filing says the local government is setting the terms for siting and regulation, but it does not say whether any specific project has been approved, what land or utility commitments a project would require, or any tax package tied to one.

Richland Township approved temporary bans on new data center projects and battery energy storage developments. This is a local siting and zoning move that pauses new proposals while the township decides what it will allow.

A Declo farmer has sold family land for a proposed data center campus. The piece is about land assembly and a proposed site in Idaho, and it does not say whether the project has approvals, power, water, or tax terms in place.

Amazon has started construction on a new data center in Northwest Indiana. The filing does not say what the project will use in power, water, tax treatment, or land terms beyond the groundbreak­ing itself.

A school district is moving to take part in a lawsuit involving a data center developer, which makes this a local legal and community dispute tied to a proposed project. The filing excerpt does not say what the project would cost the host, what land or zoning issues are at stake, or what specific claims the district wants to press.

The piece says James Fishback is pressing Byron Donalds to oppose a proposed data center in Auburndale. It points to community-level pushback around a proposed project, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the developer has made.

Valar Atomics is filing for an initial permit tied to a proposed nuclear data center campus. The filing points to siting and regulatory steps, but the excerpt does not say what the campus would draw for power or water, or what tax or land terms would apply.

Reno has paused approvals for new data center projects while city officials consider rules tied to water use and power demand. The piece points to local siting and permitting pressure, but it does not say what new standards would be adopted or whether any specific project has been approved, denied, or withdrawn.

The piece is about a state computing law and how it gives local governments room to restrict or reject data centers. It appears to focus on siting and regulatory authority in Jefferson County.

The piece is about a proposed data center site in Salt Lake City and the fact that it could be built next to homes. Based on the headline and excerpt, the community issue is the nearby residential location, while the filing details about power, water, taxes, or land are not spelled out here.

The project is still advancing in Dauphin County, but neighbors are raising utility and pollution concerns. The filing, as presented here, does not explain the project’s full power needs, water demand, tax terms, or site specifics beyond that local objections are centered on those impacts.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Maui and the military’s refusal to say how much water it will use. It squarely concerns water demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.

Residents in central Massachusetts are objecting to a proposed data center at a public meeting. The filing as presented does not say whether the project needs a zoning change, tax deal, water service, or power arrangement, only that local opposition is focused on the proposal itself.

The piece is about federal permitting legislation and how critics say it would ease development conditions for AI data centers. It points to policy changes that could affect where and how projects get approved, but the excerpt does not name a specific site, project, or financial commitment.

The piece is about bill filing in the Texas Legislature, with data center limits among the early measures being filed. It does not say which projects, sites, or companies would be affected, or what any specific limit would require.

Voters in ten states rejected new data center development in 40 of 41 local ballot measures on November 3, in what trackers call the largest such wave on record.