Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 1 of 8.
The piece concerns a proposed data center tied to the Eastern Plains Ranch site in Elbert County, Colorado. It is framed around the site and its water and cooling implications, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project has made on power, water, tax, or land, or what local approvals it has or has not secured.
Sacramento utility leaders are criticizing data center projects and asking for stronger protections around how those projects are handled. The piece appears to focus on local oversight and the community impacts tied to power and cooling demands, not on a specific approved build.
Valar Atomics is filing for an initial permit tied to a proposed nuclear data center campus. The filing points to siting and regulatory steps, but the excerpt does not say what the campus would draw for power or water, or what tax or land terms would apply.
Reno has paused approvals for new data center projects while city officials consider rules tied to water use and power demand. The piece points to local siting and permitting pressure, but it does not say what new standards would be adopted or whether any specific project has been approved, denied, or withdrawn.
The project is still advancing in Dauphin County, but neighbors are raising utility and pollution concerns. The filing, as presented here, does not explain the project’s full power needs, water demand, tax terms, or site specifics beyond that local objections are centered on those impacts.
The piece is about a proposed data center in Maui and the military’s refusal to say how much water it will use. It squarely concerns water demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.
A township near Jackson adopted rules that would limit data center noise and water use. The filing does not say whether any specific project is proposed there or how the rules would affect land use, taxes, or power.
The air permit hearing for Project Jupiter was postponed, and the filing says there is no new date yet. That leaves the project in the regulatory process without a new hearing schedule, and the excerpt does not say why the hearing was delayed or what the permit covers in detail.
Google says it plans its first data center in Wyoming and ties the project to a large investment and power arrangements. The filing does not say how the site will be supplied with water, what land or zoning changes are involved, or what tax terms the host community will get.
The story is about a proposed AI data center that would draw on the Blackfoot River and the local resistance it encountered in a Montana town. It concerns water use and community pushback over where the project would be built and what it would take from the place hosting it.
Mississippi alleges the project began work on a Southaven data center before the required water permits were in place. The filing is about water compliance and the regulatory dispute around a specific proposed site, not about the operator’s business more broadly.
A developer has filed plans to convert existing warehouse buildings in Auburndale, Florida, into a data center. The filing points to a reuse of land and buildings, but the excerpt does not say what power supply, water use, tax treatment, or local approvals are attached to the project.
Clarksville is moving ahead with a water plant overhaul, and Microsoft is paying for the work. The filing does not say in the excerpt how the plant will change operations, what water impacts are expected, or whether the arrangement includes any tax or land terms.
Central Ohio voters are weighing local limits on data center development, with the dispute centered on how large these projects can be and what conditions they face. The excerpt points to a community and zoning fight, with the water and cooling issue also in view, but it does not specify any particular project commitments or deal terms.
A proposed large data center is moving into Cochise County, and the first community meeting is now on the calendar. The filing as presented does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the project, only that local residents will get a chance to hear about it.
The piece is about developers looking at golf courses as potential sites for data centers, with water savings used as part of the pitch. It concerns land use and siting, and it hints at water as a project tradeoff, but it does not say which specific projects moved forward or what any host community agreed to.
The piece says Microsoft’s proposed Indiana data center has cleared another procedural step, with groundwater approval and air permit review moving ahead. It does not say the project is built, how much power or water it will use, or what tax or land terms are attached.
The piece focuses on a Pennsylvania town weighing data center development, with residents split between opposition and support. It appears to center on local siting and community response, and the excerpt does not say whether the project has committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.
Residents in Brazoria County are pushing back against a proposed data center, and the story centers on local opposition in a place where county officials have limited tools to block it. The filing does not say that the project has been approved or built, and it does not spell out the site's power, water, tax, or land terms.
The piece is about a proposed data center in Campbell County and the concerns nearby residents are raising about it. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, and the source label suggests water and cooling are part of the concern, but it does not say the project’s full power, tax, or land terms.
Amazon is proposing a large data center campus in West Richland, with the filing describing a possible buildout of up to 21 buildings. The piece points to local impacts through jobs and likely utility use, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project has actually secured.
The piece summarizes public opposition to data center proposals, with water concerns showing up most often in the comments and meeting records. It also suggests many local discussions proceed without visible project supporters, but it does not identify a specific site, utility deal, land action, or approval outcome.
TerraVolt is planning a 240 MW data center campus in Idaho and says it would be behind the meter. The excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments come with the project.
The piece appears to concern backlash to a proposed AI data center and the gap between its clean-energy claims and the community or environmental costs tied to power and water use. It does not give a specific host site, utility deal, or approval outcome in the excerpt provided.
The piece is about local opposition to data center development in Iowa and the concerns driving that pushback. Based on the headline and section label, water and cooling are part of the dispute, along with community resistance to siting these projects.