Archive

The piece is about Nevada residents pushing back on a federal permitting bill because they think it could affect data center development and tribal sovereignty. It is about state-level political opposition around siting and regulation, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.

Google and Meta are part of a new Alabama trade group for the data center industry. The excerpt says the group is meant to give the sector a unified voice on policy, but it does not say the filing commits a specific site to power, water, tax incentives, or land use.

State lawmakers are pressing New Jersey regulators to deny an air permit for a proposed South Brunswick data center. The filing points to environmental permitting and local opposition around whether the project should move ahead.

Cuyahoga Falls adopted rules that will govern future data center proposals in the city. The filing says the local government is setting the terms for siting and regulation, but it does not say whether any specific project has been approved, what land or utility commitments a project would require, or any tax package tied to one.

The piece is about how local anger over data centers affected Pennsylvania elections and what that political shift could mean for future project approvals and incentives. It centers on community backlash and the tax and policy response rather than a specific new build.

Richland Township approved temporary bans on new data center projects and battery energy storage developments. This is a local siting and zoning move that pauses new proposals while the township decides what it will allow.

Sacramento utility leaders are criticizing data center projects and asking for stronger protections around how those projects are handled. The piece appears to focus on local oversight and the community impacts tied to power and cooling demands, not on a specific approved build.

Reno has paused approvals for new data center projects while city officials consider rules tied to water use and power demand. The piece points to local siting and permitting pressure, but it does not say what new standards would be adopted or whether any specific project has been approved, denied, or withdrawn.

The piece is about a state computing law and how it gives local governments room to restrict or reject data centers. It appears to focus on siting and regulatory authority in Jefferson County.

A township near Jackson adopted rules that would limit data center noise and water use. The filing does not say whether any specific project is proposed there or how the rules would affect land use, taxes, or power.

FERC's rejection of Talen's expanded Susquehanna-AWS co-location deal has become the precedent reshaping how data centers connect to power in PJM territory.

FERC's rejection of Talen's expanded Susquehanna-AWS co-location deal has become the precedent reshaping how data centers connect to power in PJM territory.

The piece says Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek wants new rules for data centers as part of her next four years in office. On the excerpt provided, it does not say what those rules would require, whether they would affect a specific project, or any tax, power, water, or land commitment tied to a named site.

The suit is about a data center project in Eagan and a dispute over temporary cooling equipment. It points to a local conflict over how the project is being operated, and it may have implications for municipal oversight or approvals, but the excerpt does not say what relief the city seeks or whether the equipment affects power, water, or land use specifically.

The piece is about federal permitting legislation and how critics say it would ease development conditions for AI data centers. It points to policy changes that could affect where and how projects get approved, but the excerpt does not name a specific site, project, or financial commitment.

The piece is about bill filing in the Texas Legislature, with data center limits among the early measures being filed. It does not say which projects, sites, or companies would be affected, or what any specific limit would require.

Wyoming lawmakers advanced a bill that would direct tax revenue tied to data centers toward WYDOT. The filing does not say which projects would pay, how much money is involved, or whether the measure would change any specific site deal.

Raritan is moving toward a local ban on data centers, which makes this a community and zoning story rather than a project approval. The filing does not describe a specific project site, power deal, water use, or tax package.

Grand County is paying for outside help before deciding whether to prohibit data centers. The piece is about local siting rules and the county’s regulatory process, not a specific project’s power, water, or tax commitments.

Wisconsin Democratic legislative leaders are proposing new rules for data centers. The piece is about state-level guardrails, so it likely concerns how projects would be reviewed or constrained rather than a single build.

An environmental group is organizing a protest in Penn Yan and pressing for a moratorium on data center development in Torrey. The filing says the group is focused on stopping or delaying the project, but it does not describe any power, water, tax, or land commitment by the developer.

Mississippi alleges the project began work on a Southaven data center before the required water permits were in place. The filing is about water compliance and the regulatory dispute around a specific proposed site, not about the operator’s business more broadly.