Archive

Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.

Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.

Spanish Fork changed its zoning to allow a data center in Spanish Fork Canyon, which clears a local land-use step for a proposed project near the existing wind turbines. The filing does not say that the center is approved to build, only that the city opened the door for the request to move forward.

The piece reports local and state-level opposition to a proposed data center in South Whitehall, including concern about its proximity to a high school. It is about siting and community pushback, not a built facility or a confirmed commitment of power, water, or tax relief.

The piece says Alliance appears to be getting a data center and points readers to the likely site. It is a siting story with a local land-use question for the Ohio community hosting it, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would bring.

DeKalb County is said to have declined to greenlight a proposed Shadowbox Studios data center. The filing signals a local siting and approval dispute, but the excerpt does not say whether the county action was a permit denial, a zoning step, or a broader moratorium issue.

Buffalo is considering a two-year moratorium on new data centers. The piece is about local siting policy and community pushback, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.

Wilmington voters will not get a ballot say on the data center issue. The story is about local control around a proposed project, not the project’s power, water, or tax terms.

The Fauquier County Planning Commission is recommending a change to local rules that would tighten limits on data center development. The piece is about county-level land use and zoning control over where data centers can be built, not a specific project commitment to power, water, or tax terms.

Perry Village is putting data center rules before voters in 2026. The piece is about local control over how developers can build and operate those projects, not a specific site commitment to power, water, or tax terms.

Florida candidates are weighing in as data center projects continue to move through the state. The piece is about where these facilities are being built or proposed and the local political dispute around them, not about the operators' finances or cloud products.

The piece is about rising local opposition to proposed data center development in central Wisconsin and the push for a moratorium or other local response. It appears to focus on community and zoning pressure rather than on power, water, or financing details.

Wilmington’s select board is considering a local prohibition on large data centers. That is a siting and zoning decision for the town, and the filing does not say which project would be affected or what power, water, tax, or land terms are on the table.

Residents in Adelanto and the High Desert are opposing proposed data center amendments. The filing points to local community resistance around how the project would move forward, but it does not say whether any amendment was adopted or spell out the project's power, water, tax, or land commitments.

A developer is suing Upper Merion Township after the township rejected proposed data center projects in King of Prussia. The filing points to a land-use and local approval fight; it does not say the township committed power, water, tax terms, or other project support.