Archive
(169 Total Articles)Page 1 of 1.
The piece is about the idea of putting data centers in orbit, framed as a feasibility question rather than a specific project filing. It does not describe a named site, host community, or commitments on land, power, water, or tax.
Ohio residents are pushing back against data center development, and pro-AI groups are trying to soften that opposition. The piece is about local community resistance and the public campaign around future data center siting in Ohio, not about a specific new project filing or utility commitment.
A local group is organizing a rally against tax breaks and other public incentives for big technology projects. The item points to community pushback over how much the host government is willing to grant, but it does not identify a specific project, host site, or incentive package in the excerpt provided.
Maryland is reviewing data center proposals through a new state task force. The piece appears to concern how the state will handle siting and public review of future projects, not a specific build commitment yet.
Onondaga County says a study on a proposed AI data center is close to done. The filing points to a public process around the project, but it does not spell out a site, a power deal, water use, tax terms, or whether the county will move forward.
The piece is about China putting AI compute in orbit on a satellite and using onboard processing to handle Earth-observation data faster. It is an orbital infrastructure story, not a project that commits a host site on land, water, tax, or power.
The piece is about a South Carolina data center and the gap between its projected water use and when that information reached the public. It concerns cooling demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.
Virginia is weighing changes that would give local communities more leverage over data center proposals. The filing points to community benefits and a 25-megawatt threshold, but it does not say which specific projects would be affected or what limits would be imposed.
The piece explains how land can be treated as "powered" only after grid connection work is far enough along, which fits the publication’s power and siting coverage. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, place, utility, or developer commitment beyond the general concept of grid connection stages.
A data center developer made a political contribution before a panel selection tied to a proposed local project. The piece points to questions about transparency and local decision-making, but the excerpt does not say whether any land use, tax, power, or water commitment was approved.
The piece points to a possible federal push to use public land for data centers and, by implication, the land and permitting questions that would follow. The excerpt does not say which sites are involved, what agencies would control the land, or whether any project has been approved.
The piece is about criticism of proposed Virginia rules for data centers and whether they would change how projects are reviewed and held accountable. It centers on regulation and community oversight, not on a specific build, power deal, water agreement, or tax package.
The piece is about competing federal data center bills after a Senate block. It concerns regulation and legislation affecting where and how projects may be built, but the excerpt does not say which projects, states, power deals, or tax terms are at issue.