Archive

Google and Meta are part of a new Alabama trade group for the data center industry. The excerpt says the group is meant to give the sector a unified voice on policy, but it does not say the filing commits a specific site to power, water, tax incentives, or land use.

The piece is about a proposed data center site in Salt Lake City and the fact that it could be built next to homes. Based on the headline and excerpt, the community issue is the nearby residential location, while the filing details about power, water, taxes, or land are not spelled out here.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Maui and the military’s refusal to say how much water it will use. It squarely concerns water demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.

The piece is about Virginia’s tax treatment of data centers and how the state measures the return from the break. It belongs in the money and taxation lanes, with the focus on what the public gives up and what the project returns to the state.

This piece says Virginia's data center sales tax break has reduced state revenue by a large amount over five years. It is about public money given up to support data centers, not about a specific new site or build decision.

The story is about a proposed expansion of a small data center in Milwaukee by the Potawatomi tribe. Based on the headline and excerpt, it does not say what the project would commit the host to in power, water, tax, or land terms, or whether any approvals or financing details have been filed.

A new advocacy group is trying to counter criticism of data centers and frame the industry as secure and American-made. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, site, utility deal, or local approval, so it does not say what any host community is actually taking on.

The piece appears to focus on a Wisconsin data center and on efforts to shape public opinion around it through paid social media promotion. It points to a community-facing campaign around a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the filing or developer discloses land, power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about a local agreement between Graham and a data center developer, with the excerpt pointing to tax abatements and incentives. It appears to concern what the project will receive from the host community, but the excerpt does not say what site, power, water, or land terms were included.

A developer has filed plans to convert existing warehouse buildings in Auburndale, Florida, into a data center. The filing points to a reuse of land and buildings, but the excerpt does not say what power supply, water use, tax treatment, or local approvals are attached to the project.

Ohio is being added to a larger wave of local resistance to data centers. The piece says ballot and policy pushes around disclosure and grid protection could shape how future projects are reviewed, but it does not describe a specific project commitment to land, water, taxes, or power.

The piece is about a county commission shake-up in Box Elder County after a data center dispute. It points to local political fallout from siting controversy, but the excerpt does not say anything about new project commitments on power, water, tax, or land.

The piece summarizes public opposition to data center proposals, with water concerns showing up most often in the comments and meeting records. It also suggests many local discussions proceed without visible project supporters, but it does not identify a specific site, utility deal, land action, or approval outcome.

Larimer County is asking residents for input as it writes rules for data centers. The excerpt does not say what the proposed rules would require on land use, power, water, taxes, or approvals, beyond the public comment process itself.

The piece is about Google’s orbital data center effort and the first transmission from a satellite AI server back to Earth. It does not say anything about land, water, taxes, utility power, or community approvals for a specific host site.

The piece is about two data center operators saying they will provide more disclosure about their facilities and operations. It does not describe a new site, a permit, power or water commitment, or a local deal.

Residents in Hudspeth County say they were not informed early enough about a proposed $15 billion data center plan. The piece is about local siting and community notice around a proposed project in Texas, with water and cooling concerns in the background.

The piece is about a proposed data center project in Coshocton County and the developer’s emphasis on being transparent with local residents as the project moves forward. The excerpt does not say anything about power supply, water use, taxes, land deals, or approvals.

The piece is about a new AWWA report meant to help water utilities assess proposed data center development. It points to utility planning and water-use evaluation, but the excerpt does not say what a specific project commits to or name any particular site.

The piece appears to cover a state data center map, the number of facilities in the state, and criticism from opponents. Based on the headline and excerpt, it points to siting and community reaction, with a possible policy or transparency angle, but it does not say what specific project commitments or filings are involved.

The story is about Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker pressing for statewide data center rules while talks in Springfield have not produced a deal. It concerns regulation and the state-level siting and policy environment for data centers, not a specific project commitment.

TerraWatt presented its Riverbend data center proposal at an open house in Alton. The excerpt does not say what the project commits the host to on power, water, tax terms, or land use, or what questions were raised at the event.