Archive
(169 Total Articles)Page 1 of 2.
Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.
Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.
This piece appears to be about a proposed OpenAI data center near Belmont Glen in Effingham County, Georgia, and the local concerns that come with a new facility next door. The excerpt points to water and cooling as the immediate issue, with the broader project likely affecting nearby residents through land use and community impacts, though the filing details are not provided here.
Marion County is weighing a data center proposal and the dispute is about how large the project should be and how much power it would draw. The piece centers on local siting and load concerns, with Virginia used as the comparison point.
The piece is about a proposed state study of brownfields as possible data center locations in Virginia, and it points to specific sites that could qualify. It concerns siting policy and land reuse, not a committed project or a power, water, or tax package for one named facility.
A court or other decision has been made on an effort to halt work at a proposed data center site in Cumberland County. The filing and headline indicate a local fight over whether construction can continue, but they do not say what the ruling changed on water, power, tax, or land terms.
New Jersey fined DataOne over pollution and permit violations tied to a Vineland data center. The filing points to environmental and regulatory problems at a specific site, but does not say how the violations affect the project's power, water, land, or tax terms beyond the enforcement action.
The piece is about a South Carolina data center and the gap between its projected water use and when that information reached the public. It concerns cooling demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.
New Jersey’s administration has fined a Vineland data center, which points to a regulatory or enforcement issue tied to the site rather than a buildout update. The filing does not say what triggered the fine, whether the amount will be contested, or what the project’s broader water, power, land, or tax obligations are.
The piece says a data center power plant has cleared a key permitting step, which points to the project’s air permitting and environmental review. It does not say the plant is built or operating, and it does not give the broader terms of any power, water, tax, or land deal.
A Georgia data center project tied to OpenAI is facing legal action from an environmental group seeking to stop it. The filing appears to concern local siting and opposition, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on power, water, tax, or land.
A former International Paper site in Natchez is being considered for a data center. The filing or excerpt does not say who the developer is, what the site would require for power or water, or whether there are any approvals, incentives, or local objections.
DeKalb County is said to have declined to greenlight a proposed Shadowbox Studios data center. The filing signals a local siting and approval dispute, but the excerpt does not say whether the county action was a permit denial, a zoning step, or a broader moratorium issue.
Virginia is weighing changes that would give local communities more leverage over data center proposals. The filing points to community benefits and a 25-megawatt threshold, but it does not say which specific projects would be affected or what limits would be imposed.
South Carolina regulators approved a permit tied to a Spartanburg data center, letting the project move forward on its power plan. The filing does not say what land was assembled, what water use is expected, or what local tax terms, if any, were attached.
The Fauquier County Planning Commission is recommending a change to local rules that would tighten limits on data center development. The piece is about county-level land use and zoning control over where data centers can be built, not a specific project commitment to power, water, or tax terms.
A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed over an employee's death at the Whitehaven SpaceXAI facility in Memphis. The filing points to a legal dispute tied to a specific data center site and the conditions at that location, but the excerpt does not say what caused the death or what relief is being sought.
Florida candidates are weighing in as data center projects continue to move through the state. The piece is about where these facilities are being built or proposed and the local political dispute around them, not about the operators' finances or cloud products.
The piece is about legal challenges tied to a proposed data center in Birmingham. It concerns the local siting fight and the community pushback around the project, and the excerpt does not say how the lawsuits may resolve or what project commitments are being contested.
The piece is about criticism of proposed Virginia rules for data centers and whether they would change how projects are reviewed and held accountable. It centers on regulation and community oversight, not on a specific build, power deal, water agreement, or tax package.
A Jefferson County judge has merged lawsuits tied to Birmingham's Nebius AI Factory site. The dispute centers on zoning and construction impacts, so it is a local siting and community fight rather than a project financing or utility story.
An environmental group is seeking an injunction in a dispute with Spartanburg County over a proposed data center. The filing and the headline point to a local siting and community fight, but do not say how the county, land, power, water, or incentives would be committed if the project goes ahead.
Residents in Nutley are organizing a petition to block a proposed data center on Kingsland Street. The piece is about local community opposition to a specific siting proposal; it does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, utility deals, or a final decision.
Philadelphia residents are asking city officials to pause data center activity instead of creating a task force. The piece is about local opposition and how residents want the city to handle proposed development.
A coalition is asking Guilford County to impose a long pause on data center approvals. The piece is about local opposition and county siting policy, and it does not say the proposal has been adopted or describe any utility, tax, or land deal.


