Archive

Soluna is said to be pursuing a large AI data center expansion in Willacy County. The filing or report, as given here, does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments are attached to the project.

The project is a proposed data center on leased land tied to the LDS Church, and the filing says it is moving ahead. The excerpt does not say whether any tax break, land approval, power deal, water commitment, or local permit has actually been granted.

The piece is about how local anger over data centers affected Pennsylvania elections and what that political shift could mean for future project approvals and incentives. It centers on community backlash and the tax and policy response rather than a specific new build.

Soluna is holding a public open house in Raymondville to promote a proposed second data center in Willacy County. The piece is about local siting and community outreach tied to a possible tax-incentive-backed project, but it does not say the project has been approved or built.

The piece is about Virginia’s tax treatment of data centers and how the state measures the return from the break. It belongs in the money and taxation lanes, with the focus on what the public gives up and what the project returns to the state.

This piece says Virginia's data center sales tax break has reduced state revenue by a large amount over five years. It is about public money given up to support data centers, not about a specific new site or build decision.

The piece says Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek wants new rules for data centers as part of her next four years in office. On the excerpt provided, it does not say what those rules would require, whether they would affect a specific project, or any tax, power, water, or land commitment tied to a named site.

The story appears to cover local debate over a proposed data center and how a trip to Alabama changed some officials' views. The headline points to public decision-making and likely tax or incentive issues, but it does not state any final commitment of land, power, water, or tax terms.

Wisconsin Democratic legislative leaders are proposing new rules for data centers. The piece is about state-level guardrails, so it likely concerns how projects would be reviewed or constrained rather than a single build.

The piece is about how election results could affect Texas tax treatment for data centers. It is about a possible change in money policy, not a specific project commitment, and it does not say which project or local deal would change.

The piece appears to focus on a Wisconsin data center and on efforts to shape public opinion around it through paid social media promotion. It points to a community-facing campaign around a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the filing or developer discloses land, power, water, or tax terms.

Indianapolis officials are set to review a large property tax incentive package for DC Blox tied to a data center project on the city’s east side. The filing says the proposal is about tax relief; it does not say the project’s power needs, water use, land assembly details, or whether the incentive has been approved.

The piece is about a local agreement between Graham and a data center developer, with the excerpt pointing to tax abatements and incentives. It appears to concern what the project will receive from the host community, but the excerpt does not say what site, power, water, or land terms were included.

The piece covers ballot fights over data center incentives and local approvals in the United States, and what those losses may mean for future project siting and tax deals. It is about community and taxation pressure on proposed projects, not a specific build.

The piece is about a proposed Senate bill that could shift a large cost onto data center operators. It is a policy and taxation story about who would bear the financial burden, not a report on a specific site or project.

The piece concerns Pennsylvania’s data center tax exemption and the debate around keeping or changing it. It is about state tax policy for a specific class of projects, not a site buildout itself.

The filing describes a proposed data center on Indianapolis’s east side and the community investment package tied to it. It says what the project offers the host community, but the excerpt does not spell out the land, water, or power commitments in detail.

The story says an Irvington data center proposal could provide money tied to the demolition of Washington Square. It is about a local project’s tax or incentive structure and the community cost it is being linked to, but the excerpt does not say the full terms or whether the project is approved.

The piece is about the Beaver Dam Meta data center and the tax treatment attached to it. It appears to focus on how the project reduces federal tax liability, but the excerpt does not say what local land, power, water, or other public commitments were included with the site.

The piece appears to examine how proposed data centers in Minnesota could affect household costs through property taxes and electric bills. It is framed as a local public-cost story, not a company or product story.

The story is about Louisiana’s governor tightening the rules tied to tax breaks for data centers and framing them as industrial projects. It concerns public money and state taxation policy, not a specific build site or utility arrangement.

Hilliard reports that Amazon’s proposed data-center projects received property-tax breaks while also exceeding job targets. The filing, as described here, says something about local tax relief and hiring performance, but it does not say what land, power, water, or utility commitments came with the projects.