Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 11 of 30.
The piece is about Graham looking for safeguards around a proposed data center after talks over a county tax abatement fell apart. It concerns local tax treatment and the county’s role in what gets built, but the excerpt does not say the project’s size, site, power needs, water use, or whether any agreement was actually reached.
The piece says the Leola data center’s conditional use permit request has been tabled again. That points to an unresolved siting and zoning step, but the excerpt does not say what the applicant asked for beyond the permit or why the delay happened.
Memphis council members approved a pause on new data center projects, and the headline says they did so without fully understanding the measure they were voting on. The piece centers on local zoning and transparency in a Southeast city, with the pause affecting where new projects can move forward.
A developer withdrew a proposed data center plan in the Philadelphia suburbs after public opposition. The filing signals a siting fight that ended before approval, and it does not say the project will move forward elsewhere or give details on power, water, tax, or land commitments.
Texas counties are moving to tighten groundwater rules as data center growth adds pressure to local water supplies. The piece is about local regulation, water demand, and the siting consequences for projects that rely on groundwater access.
Residents in Goochland are still pushing back over a proposed data center project in the West Creek area, while a judge considers whether to dismiss the related TOD lawsuit. The filing points to an ongoing siting and legal dispute; it does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The piece is about Geronimo Power contesting a proposed moratorium before a vote in Harmony Township. It is a local siting and zoning fight, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on land, power, water, or taxes, only that the developer is pushing back.
Digital Realty is proposing a large data center campus in Indiana. The filing as given points to a siting and money story, but it does not say whether the project has secured land, utility power, water, tax treatment, or local approvals.
Savannah and Chatham County are set to consider a data center ordinance alongside updates to the 2040 comprehensive plan. The excerpt does not say what the ordinance would change, whether any project is named, or what commitments on land, power, water, or tax relief are on the table.
Four Georgia families have filed suit alleging that construction of a Meta data center polluted their well water. The filing raises water, environmental, and legal questions about what the project may have done to nearby private wells, but the excerpt does not say whether the data center is operating or what specific contamination was found.
The piece says a proposed AI data center tied to a San Francisco mall is running into power and permitting obstacles. It points to siting and utility constraints, but the excerpt does not say what power source, water use, tax deal, or land transaction is actually in place.
Loudoun County ended plans for a proposed Amazon data center after community opposition. The filing, as described here, does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments were tied to the project or what specific concessions were under discussion.
The piece is about Memphis residents pushing back against a proposed data center buildout and the pollution concerns tied to it. It focuses on local opposition and the city’s debate over whether to pause or limit that development.
The piece is about a proposed data center project in Yukon, Oklahoma, and a reported change in its water plan. It centers on what the developer does or does not plan to use for cooling, which affects local water demand and utility planning.
Parkland’s local government is lining up against a proposed data center sited across from a high school. The filing points to community opposition and a zoning or siting dispute, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, and it does not mention any power, water, tax, or land commitment terms.
Louisville council is taking another look at proposed rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and how the city may shape future data center siting and operations.
Ormond Beach has turned a data center ban into formal local policy. The piece concerns land use rules and local regulation, not a project buildout or utility commitment.
Taunton has adopted a one-year ban on data centers, and the story centers on the public pushback that led to it. The excerpt also raises the question of whether an exception could still be made for a project tied to an industrial park, but it does not say any exception has been approved.
Soluna and Applied Digital are proposing a 50-megawatt AI data center in Texas. The filing as given does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approvals are attached to the project, only that the plan exists.
Natrona County and Prometheus Hyperscale are discussing a new AI complex and whether it can avoid state-level review. The filing points to a siting and regulatory issue in Wyoming, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project has made.
North Dakota lawmakers are starting to draft rules for how data centers will be handled in the state. The piece is about proposed legislation and the policy questions around incentives and oversight, not a specific build.
Milwaukee has moved to pause data center projects, joining other Wisconsin cities that have put temporary holds on this kind of development. The filing says nothing about a specific site, power deal, water use, tax package, or developer proposal.
Colorado regulators are set to review Xcel's proposed data center tariff and decide whether it shields other customers from the costs tied to large new loads. The piece is about utility rate design and public oversight in Colorado, not about a specific data center site being built.
Lawmakers are pushing back on a utility claim tied to a data center proposal. The piece appears to focus on how the project would affect power planning and what the utility has said, rather than on construction itself.
The piece is about a Little Rock ordinance that would have paused data center projects and failed again, so the immediate issue is local opposition and city-level regulation, not a specific build. It does not say which project or projects are affected, nor does it identify any power, water, tax, or land commitment tied to a particular site.