Archive

Onondaga County says a study on a proposed AI data center is close to done. The filing points to a public process around the project, but it does not spell out a site, a power deal, water use, tax terms, or whether the county will move forward.

The piece says a Midtown data center site is facing a tax sale tied to unpaid obligations. It points to a money and taxation issue for the property and the local public body involved, but the excerpt does not say whether the site is operating, who owns it, or whether the project will continue.

Planners in the Lehigh Valley are scrutinizing proposed data center projects in Allentown and Bethlehem. The filing points to local review of where the projects would go and what they may require from the host communities, but it does not say the projects are approved or describe any final commitments on power, water, tax, or land.

Residents in Conneaut are organizing against a possible data center project and want it stopped before it advances further. The piece is about local opposition and early siting uncertainty, not a confirmed build or a disclosed project package.

The piece says Alliance appears to be getting a data center and points readers to the likely site. It is a siting story with a local land-use question for the Ohio community hosting it, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would bring.

The piece is about organized opposition to data center projects in Nebraska and the way that opposition cuts across party lines. It points to a community and siting fight, not a specific project commitment on power, water, or tax terms.

Aberdeen is supplying bulk water to a contractor tied to a data center project in Ellendale. The filing or excerpt does not say how much water is involved, what the cooling setup is, or what terms the contractor is getting.

The piece is about a local protest over Wisconsin’s sales-tax exemption for hyperscale data center companies. It concerns public opposition to a tax incentive that would affect future data center projects in the state.

Residents in Morgan County are pressing the county commission over local frustration tied to proposed data center development. The piece is about community opposition and how local officials are handling it; it does not say the filing committed the host to power, water, tax, or land terms.

Buffalo is considering a two-year moratorium on new data centers. The piece is about local siting policy and community pushback, not a specific project approval or utility commitment.

Wilmington voters will not get a ballot say on the data center issue. The story is about local control around a proposed project, not the project’s power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about a large data center being built in an Ohio town that is under economic strain. The excerpt points to the project’s cooling and water implications, but it does not say what power source, tax deal, land package, or local approvals are attached to it.

Perry Village is putting data center rules before voters in 2026. The piece is about local control over how developers can build and operate those projects, not a specific site commitment to power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about rising local opposition to proposed data center development in central Wisconsin and the push for a moratorium or other local response. It appears to focus on community and zoning pressure rather than on power, water, or financing details.

A data center developer made a political contribution before a panel selection tied to a proposed local project. The piece points to questions about transparency and local decision-making, but the excerpt does not say whether any land use, tax, power, or water commitment was approved.

A petition in Mandan is pushing for a citywide vote on whether to ban large-scale AI data centers. The filing is about local opposition and possible land-use restrictions, not about a specific project commitment to power, water, taxes, or land.

Central Illinois counties are moving ahead with rules for data centers. The filing points to local regulation and siting decisions, but it does not say what specific project, land commitment, power setup, or water deal is affected.

The piece is about a proposed data center project near Saline and the local approvals and incentives tied to it. The excerpt points to tax abatements and other public support, but it does not say what land, power, water, or community commitments the project makes.

Massachusetts would require new data centers to use clean energy, which makes this a state-level rule on how new projects are powered. The headline does not say how the requirement will be enforced, what counts as clean energy, or whether existing facilities are covered.

The piece is about a local data center dispute centered on public opposition and the city’s handling of comment on the project. It says the city released critical emails, social media posts, and voicemails after a brief pause on public comment, but it does not describe the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

The piece appears to connect rising data center demand in western Pennsylvania with continued fracking activity tied to that power and infrastructure buildout. It points to the local resource and land-use effects around new compute growth, while the excerpt does not spell out a specific project, utility deal, or permitting action.

South Huntingdon adopted local rules for data center development after residents raised objections to the facilities. The filing does not say whether any project is proposed there, what the rules cover in detail, or whether they change land use, power, water, or tax terms.