Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 12 of 30.
Amazon is funding a study of a small modular reactor plant intended to support data centers in Indiana. The filing says this is a proposed energy supply study, but it does not say the project is approved, built, or tied to a specific site commitment on land, water, taxes, or transmission costs.
Residents are moving from opposition to legal action over a proposed 1.5 million-square-foot data center in East Whiteland. The filing appears to concern local approval and the project’s siting, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the developer has made on power, water, taxes, or land beyond the project size and location.
Virginia’s new tax on data center electricity use is taking effect gradually, which makes this a state tax policy story tied to the operating cost of hosting data centers. The piece appears to focus on how the tax applies and how quickly it phases in, not on a specific project buildout or site commitment.
Umatilla is weighing an emergency response to a projected loss of revenue tied to Oregon’s pause on a data center permit. The piece is about how a local government is reacting to a project-level permitting change and the money it expects to lose, not about the operator’s business plans.
Boone gave site-plan approval for two proposed data center buildings. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms are attached, and it does not describe any community objections or other approvals beyond the site plan.
The proposed Wayne County data center was withdrawn after residents turned out at City Hall. The filing does not say whether the project had specific power, water, tax, or land commitments beyond the planned site and cost.
Residents in Walls are objecting to a proposed data center at a public listening session. The excerpt points to local community pushback and a siting dispute; it does not say whether the project has approvals, what power or water commitments it would make, or what the developer offered.
The story says protests are continuing over a proposed Utah data center because of concern about water use tied to the Great Salt Lake. It is about a project’s local water burden and the community response, not about the operator’s business or the broader cloud market.
Residents in San Antonio are pushing for stricter rules on data centers because of concerns about water use, power demand, and noise. The piece is about local opposition and possible regulation of future projects, not a specific approved build.
Lowndes County approved a 20-year data center tax abatement, and the piece centers on calls for clearer public disclosure and more local control over that decision. It points to the money side of the project and the local process around it, not to the site’s power or water buildout.
The piece appears to compare Spartanburg leaders with Virginia’s data center experience, with the source label pointing to tax abatements and incentives. On the face of the headline and excerpt, it is about what a local market might learn about hosting data centers, not about a specific approved project or a new build.
The project is described as a proposed data center buildout in Pittsylvania County with 21 buildings and very large stated power and water needs. The filing or excerpt does not say what tax abatements, land terms, utility agreements, or other community concessions are attached, if any.
Alcoa is selling a former smelter site in New York that is being marketed for data center development. The filing as described does not say what power, water, tax, or land-use commitments would come with any eventual project, only that the site sale could enable that use.
The piece says data center growth is affecting a school bond estimate and shaping funding on both sides of the river. It points to local tax and public-finance effects tied to new data center development, not to the project’s power, water, or land commitments.
Texas had said it would pause permits tied to data centers, but the state is still moving those approvals forward. The piece is about how a proposed policy shift affects where data center projects can be permitted and what the state is doing instead.
Archbald council is scheduled to vote on a proposed data center campus, which puts the project’s local siting and approval process in focus. The excerpt does not say what commitments, if any, the developer has made on power, water, tax treatment, or land use terms beyond the vote itself.
A judge let a Port Washington ordinance governing tax-increment financing for data centers remain in place. The piece is about a local tax and legal dispute over incentives tied to a proposed data center development, and it does not say the project secured power, water, or land commitments.
5C is moving ahead with a large expansion of its Memphis data center project. The filing points to a proposed AI-focused facility and signals continued buildout in Memphis, but it does not say in this excerpt what new power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the expansion.
A local group held a protest outside the Somerset County courthouse against a proposed data center. The excerpt does not say which project is involved, what site changes are proposed, or whether the county is considering any approval, permit, or utility commitment.
The piece is about the public comment process for a proposed data center in Eastport and the federal permit tied to it. It centers on local opposition and the regulatory step that must be cleared before the project can move ahead.
Concord is weighing a proposed micro data center, with the question centered on whether the city will grant tax treatment or other local approval. The available text does not say what the project would consume in power or water, or whether any deal terms have been set.
NiSource is set to supply power to Microsoft's La Porte campus under a long-term arrangement. The excerpt does not say what the campus will draw from the local grid, whether there are new transmission or substation costs, or how the agreement affects rates, land use, water, or tax terms.
The filing points to a possible data center project in Warrick County, but the excerpt does not say which company is behind it or what commitments it would bring on land, power, water, taxes, or jobs. It is only a notice of a proposed site under a project name, so the community impact is still unspecified.
A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.
A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.


