Archive

The piece is about backlash to Virginia data center siting, with the focus on public opposition and what it says about how people are responding to those projects. It does not describe a specific new project commitment on land, power, water, or tax terms in the excerpt provided.

The piece is about local protest against Project Midspan. It points to community opposition to a proposed project, but the excerpt does not say what the project is, where it would be built, or what commitments it carries for power, water, tax, or land.

A South Carolina law firm is asking regulators to revisit a decision tied to a proposed Spartanburg data center. The piece is about the legal and regulatory fight around siting a project in the state, and it does not say the project has been approved, built, or that the filing changed any project terms.

Residents in Upper Burrell are organizing around local rules for a proposed data center. The piece centers on siting and community opposition in a Pennsylvania fracking area, and it does not say the project has secured approvals or committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.

A Michigan survey found residents have strong views about data centers. The piece is about public reaction to proposed data center development, which affects community acceptance and local siting politics rather than a specific power, water, or tax deal.

The piece is about a data center project in Shippingport and the local reaction around it as construction begins. It points to siting and community conflict, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project actually carries.

A California firm says it intends to build a data center at Chouteau, Oklahoma. The filing excerpt does not say what land has been assembled, what power or water supply has been arranged, or whether the proposal has local approvals.

A data center developer is seeking to use a former healthcare business site in Pennsylvania for a new project. The filing, as described, only shows a proposed land reuse and does not say what power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project would bring.

A rural Oklahoma town is trying to resist a proposed data center, but the piece says local opposition may not be enough to stop it. The filing, as described, centers on siting and community conflict rather than any firm commitment on power, water, tax, or land terms.

Palm Beach County neighbors near Mar-a-Lago voted for a local ban that would block or limit a data center project the White House opposes. The filing does not say whether the proposal is for a specific site, how much land or power it would use, or what the developer has committed on water, taxes, or other local terms.

The story says Oracle’s Project Jupiter is running into access and permitting problems tied to the pipeline and water system it would need. It describes a project-level siting and utility issue, but the excerpt does not say what permits are missing, who controls the pipeline, or whether any final approval has been denied.

A developer has filed for a proposed 200,000-square-foot data center in Jessup. The filing points to a siting proposal in a local market and, with the source label, suggests water and cooling are part of the project’s public discussion; it does not say whether the site has approvals, what utilities would serve it, or what local costs or incentives would attach.

A developer is asking a judge to overturn Pahrump's ban on a data center, and the dispute centers on water. The filing does not say the ban is already gone; it says the developer is trying to get it tossed in court.

A firm has identified land in Research Triangle Park for a proposed data center campus and says the site could be expanded later. The filing or report, as given here, does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, power, water, or local incentive terms.

A zoning board action cleared a land sale tied to proposed data center development in Pennsylvania. The filing does not say whether the projects have final financing, power, water, or tax terms, only that the land transaction moved forward.

A groundwater district official says data center development in the area is still a year or two away. The piece appears to be about local water oversight and the timing of a proposed project, not a committed build.

The piece is about how Anthropic and OpenAI are widening the map of AI data center projects and how the financing for those projects is becoming more difficult. It points to money and infrastructure questions around where the facilities go and how they get funded.

Residents in Monongahela Township are asking for more chances to weigh in on a proposed data center project. The piece is about local opposition and the public process around siting, not about power, water, or incentives.

Residents in Dinwiddie County are objecting to a proposed data center near their homes because they fear impacts on wildlife, water, and daily life. The filing shown here points to a local siting fight and community concern, but it does not say what power source, water commitment, tax deal, or land assembly terms the project would use.

This piece appears to be about a proposed OpenAI data center near Belmont Glen in Effingham County, Georgia, and the local concerns that come with a new facility next door. The excerpt points to water and cooling as the immediate issue, with the broader project likely affecting nearby residents through land use and community impacts, though the filing details are not provided here.

Spanish Fork changed its zoning to allow a data center in Spanish Fork Canyon, which clears a local land-use step for a proposed project near the existing wind turbines. The filing does not say that the center is approved to build, only that the city opened the door for the request to move forward.

The piece is about a defamation dispute tied to opposition to a proposed large data center in Utah. It centers on the public fight around the project, not on the facility’s power, water, tax, or land terms.