Archive

Calexico has made its ban on data centers permanent, which is a siting and community decision for the city. The excerpt does not say whether any specific project was proposed there, what prompted the ban, or whether the city linked it to power, water, land-use, or tax terms.

The piece is about local officials in Angelina County encouraging an AI data center project to locate there. It points to siting and public incentives, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, or tax terms were actually committed.

Opponents of the PAX-1 data center are asking a judge to halt development while related legal challenges proceed. The filing centers on a community and siting fight over whether the project should keep moving before those challenges are resolved.

A coalition is asking Guilford County to impose a long pause on data center approvals. The piece is about local opposition and county siting policy, and it does not say the proposal has been adopted or describe any utility, tax, or land deal.

The state is setting out a policy framework for data centers, which points to how future projects may be handled for incentives and tax treatment. The excerpt does not say which project is involved, what the framework requires, or whether any local approval, power, water, or land terms are included.

Westlake officials say construction is starting on a data center near Keller in North Texas. The excerpt does not say what the project needs in power, water, land, tax support, or community approvals.

The piece is about congressional pressure on data centers as political pushback builds ahead of the midterms. It points to the community and policy side of data center siting rather than a specific project, utility deal, or construction plan.

Harmony is advancing a revised proposed ordinance for data centers. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments any specific project would bring, only that local rules are being updated before any siting decision.

Residents in Jim Hogg County are objecting to a proposed large data center. The filing only shows local concern around the project and does not say what land, power, water, tax, or approval commitments the proposal would require.

The piece maps data center sites in Alabama and notes their power and water use. It is a state-level siting, power, and water rundown for a specific host location.

The piece is about Ohio data center tax policy, specifically whether the state should keep or roll back tax breaks already granted to existing projects. It is about the public cost of hosting data centers through tax relief, not about a new site or a company announcement.

Virginia has passed a new data center law, and this piece examines what the law covers and what it leaves out. It appears to be about the state rules that will shape future siting and utility impacts for data centers in Virginia, not about a single project.

Weld County cleared a zoning step for a proposed Global AI data center, which moves the project further into local siting review in Colorado. The excerpt does not say whether the project has power, water, tax, or land commitments, or what conditions the zoning approval includes.

Officials in Walls, Mississippi are considering rezoning about 1,000 acres for a proposed data center. The filing, as presented here, says the project is at the land-use stage and does not say what power, water, tax, or community terms would come with it.

The piece says a Wisconsin family sold land in Port Washington for far above its fair-market value, and that developers have already assembled more than 1,500 acres around a proposed 672-acre data center site. It points to land assembly and the money committed to control the site, but it does not say what power, water, tax, or permit terms the project has secured.

Microsoft’s data center proposal is back in front of Cherry Valley, so the local siting debate is still active. The excerpt does not say what land use changes, utility commitments, water supply terms, or tax package are on the table, if any.

Residents are suing over noise from a data center tied to Elon Musk. The piece centers on community opposition and a local quality-of-life dispute, not on the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

A new lawsuit has been filed against a data center construction project in Spartanburg County. The filing points to another round of local opposition over whether the project should proceed as planned.

Google’s proposed Lea County data center is still at the exploratory stage. The filing, as described here, points to scrutiny over land and water, but it does not say the project has secured the site, permits, or utility commitments.

The piece is about an Upper Burrell data center plan and the rule that the project must bring its own gas-fired power. That puts the focus on project siting and power, with local opposition and moratorium politics in the background.

A county in southern Virginia rejected a proposed buildout that paired 12 data centers with a large gas plant. The filing says residents organized against it and the county board voted it down; it does not say the project won any land, water, tax, or power approvals.

Google is identified as the end user for the proposed Project Clydesdale data center campus in Tulsa County. The excerpt does not say what the project has secured on land, power, water, tax treatment, or local approvals, so those commitments are not clear from this filing.