Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 16 of 16.
The state commission rejected a legal challenge to a proposed data center project in Spartanburg County. The filing does not say what the project will use for power, water, tax treatment, or land commitments.
Effingham County is considering tighter rules on where and how data centers can be built. The piece is about local siting limits and the county’s response to proposed development, not about a specific project filing or utility deal.
Leavenworth County is holding a special meeting so nearby residents can weigh in on a proposed 1,000-acre data center site. The filing says this is about local opposition and neighbor input; it does not say the project has been approved, nor does it give details on power, water, tax terms, or land commitments beyond the acreage mentioned.
The piece says a data center company is interested in possibly building a center in Humboldt County. On the record here, that is only a proposal-level siting story; it does not say the company has bought land, sought approvals, or committed power, water, or tax terms.
A Florida county has changed its zoning rules to allow a data center, which is a siting decision that opens the door to a possible project but does not mean one is committed yet. The excerpt does not say whether a developer has filed plans, what site is involved, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would come with any project.
The item appears to be about data center companies holding talks in Port Washington, which points to local project siting and possible incentives discussion. The excerpt does not say what was proposed, whether any land, power, water, or tax commitment was made, or what the companies asked for.
Aurora is considering setback rules that would limit how close data centers can be built to homes. The piece is about local siting and neighborhood impact, with the practical question being how the city balances project location against nearby residents.
Duke Energy is proposing separate utility rules for data centers in North Carolina. The piece is about how a utility would structure service terms for a specific class of large load in the state, not about a single project being built.
A data center has broken ground near a former coal plant campus in Beaver County. The filing says the project is happening at a specific site, but it does not say what power deal, water source, tax package, or land-use approval is attached to it.
Loudoun County supervisors are set to discuss whether to impose a moratorium on new data center development. The piece is about local siting rules and county approval, with no details in the excerpt on any power, water, tax, or land commitments by a specific project.
Stokes County commissioners approved rezoning tied to a proposed data center project. The filing does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax terms, or any other local commitments.
St. Louis approved a Midtown data center plan that is tied to projected tax revenue for the city over the next decade. The filing says what the project could contribute in tax terms, but it does not spell out the land deal, power supply, water use, or any clawback terms in the excerpt provided.
DeKalb County has halted a proposed 1 million-square-foot data center plan. The piece is about local siting and permitting in Georgia, and it also points to another data center proposal surfacing elsewhere in the state, but the excerpt does not say whether the project involved power, water, tax terms, or land assembly details.
The bill would pause new AI data center construction and approvals in New Jersey for six months. It is a state-level siting and community fight about whether projects can move forward at all, not a project approval itself.
Property owners have pulled back an annexation request tied to a proposed Amazon data center, which means the siting path for the project is now less certain. The filing does not say whether the project is dead, only that this land step has been withdrawn.
The piece says Savannah River Site is slated to host a proposed 1-gigawatt data center, which puts the story in siting and power. The excerpt does not say what land deal, water plan, tax package, interconnection terms, or local approvals are attached to the project.
Brookfield is said to be planning a large data center campus at the DOE’s Kentucky nuclear enrichment site. The filing or report, as given, does not say how the project will be powered, whether it will use water, what land or tax terms are involved, or what local approvals are still needed.
PJM is broadening its response to growing data center load as capacity problems in its region worsen. The piece points to power-system planning and interconnection pressure on large loads, not to a specific project filing or local siting deal.
The piece is about North Texas communities and local planners facing rapid data center growth. It points to a siting and community planning problem, not a specific project filing or incentive package.