Archive

The piece is about a large data center being built in an Ohio town that is under economic strain. The excerpt points to the project’s cooling and water implications, but it does not say what power source, tax deal, land package, or local approvals are attached to it.

Perry Village is putting data center rules before voters in 2026. The piece is about local control over how developers can build and operate those projects, not a specific site commitment to power, water, or tax terms.

A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed over an employee's death at the Whitehaven SpaceXAI facility in Memphis. The filing points to a legal dispute tied to a specific data center site and the conditions at that location, but the excerpt does not say what caused the death or what relief is being sought.

Florida candidates are weighing in as data center projects continue to move through the state. The piece is about where these facilities are being built or proposed and the local political dispute around them, not about the operators' finances or cloud products.

The piece is about rising local opposition to proposed data center development in central Wisconsin and the push for a moratorium or other local response. It appears to focus on community and zoning pressure rather than on power, water, or financing details.

A data center developer made a political contribution before a panel selection tied to a proposed local project. The piece points to questions about transparency and local decision-making, but the excerpt does not say whether any land use, tax, power, or water commitment was approved.

A developer is suing Upper Merion Township after the township rejected proposed data center projects in King of Prussia. The filing points to a land-use and local approval fight; it does not say the township committed power, water, tax terms, or other project support.

Central Illinois counties are moving ahead with rules for data centers. The filing points to local regulation and siting decisions, but it does not say what specific project, land commitment, power setup, or water deal is affected.

A petition in Mandan is pushing for a citywide vote on whether to ban large-scale AI data centers. The filing is about local opposition and possible land-use restrictions, not about a specific project commitment to power, water, taxes, or land.

Sacramento officials and local activists are debating whether data centers should be built in the city and what those facilities would mean for water use and other community impacts. The piece appears to cover the local political argument rather than a specific approved project.

The piece is about criticism of proposed Virginia rules for data centers and whether they would change how projects are reviewed and held accountable. It centers on regulation and community oversight, not on a specific build, power deal, water agreement, or tax package.

Residents in Adelanto and the High Desert are opposing proposed data center amendments. The filing points to local community resistance around how the project would move forward, but it does not say whether any amendment was adopted or spell out the project's power, water, tax, or land commitments.

The piece is about a local data center dispute centered on public opposition and the city’s handling of comment on the project. It says the city released critical emails, social media posts, and voicemails after a brief pause on public comment, but it does not describe the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

A public poll in Montana finds broad voter opposition to new data centers. The piece is about local political resistance, not a specific project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

Philadelphia residents are asking city officials to pause data center activity instead of creating a task force. The piece is about local opposition and how residents want the city to handle proposed development.

The piece is about a proposed waterfront data center near the Ventura County Fairgrounds and the public concern it raised. From the headline and excerpt, the board’s action appears to be aimed at easing those concerns, but the filing does not say whether the project needs land approvals, power commitments, water supply, tax terms, or other project obligations.

South Huntingdon adopted local rules for data center development after residents raised objections to the facilities. The filing does not say whether any project is proposed there, what the rules cover in detail, or whether they change land use, power, water, or tax terms.

Residents in Nutley are organizing a petition to block a proposed data center on Kingsland Street. The piece is about local community opposition to a specific siting proposal; it does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, utility deals, or a final decision.

An environmental group is seeking an injunction in a dispute with Spartanburg County over a proposed data center. The filing and the headline point to a local siting and community fight, but do not say how the county, land, power, water, or incentives would be committed if the project goes ahead.

Farmers in Ohio are pressing for protection of water resources as data-center demand grows. The piece is about local water concerns tied to proposed data-center development, not about the operators themselves.

The piece addresses a water-use claim around data centers in the Colorado River system. It says experts do not think data centers are the cause of the river cuts, which makes this a water-and-community story about blame and local impacts rather than a project filing or site-specific commitment.

The piece says river-area mayors are talking about conservation because data center demand is putting new pressure on water supplies. It appears to be about how local governments along the Mississippi River are responding to that water-use issue, not about a specific project approval or utility deal.