Archive

Ohio ballot measures on data centers have been rejected in a string of local votes. The piece is about community opposition and siting fights over where these projects can be built in the state.

The piece is about opposition to a proposed data center from neighbors who live near it. The excerpt points to a local conflict over the project’s effects on the surrounding area, especially noise and community impact, but it does not say what the developer has committed on power, water, taxes, or land.

Cromwell is holding a public hearing on its data center dispute, which points to a local decision-making fight rather than a completed project. The filing does not say which project is proposed, what the town may approve or deny, or whether any power, water, tax, or land deal is attached.

Thirteen townships in Jackson County have moved to pause AI data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning resistance, and it affects where projects could be approved rather than any specific power, water, or tax commitment.

The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center project in Maryland and the role of an unexpected activist in helping push back on it. It centers on siting and community resistance, with the project still described as proposed rather than approved.

An environmental group is organizing a protest in Penn Yan and pressing for a moratorium on data center development in Torrey. The filing says the group is focused on stopping or delaying the project, but it does not describe any power, water, tax, or land commitment by the developer.

A developer is asking a court to make Springfield review proposed data center plans while the city’s moratorium is in place. The dispute is about whether the project can move through local review, so the immediate effects fall on siting and the city’s permitting process, not on power, water, or tax terms that the excerpt does not mention.

A judge is weighing whether residents in Grayslake may have missed the deadline to challenge a data center dispute, while also flagging a possible due process issue. The piece is about the legal fight around a proposed data center and the local opposition to it, not about the project’s power, water, or tax terms.

A Michigan township is considering rezoning a large tract of land, and the question is whether that change would make a data center possible. The filing, as presented here, does not say the project is approved, who the developer is, or what commitments it would require on power, water, or taxes.

The piece appears to focus on a Wisconsin data center and on efforts to shape public opinion around it through paid social media promotion. It points to a community-facing campaign around a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the filing or developer discloses land, power, water, or tax terms.

The piece covers a county board meeting over a proposed data center and the local friction around that siting process. It appears to focus on land-use approval and community reaction, not on power, water, or tax terms that were actually adopted.

The piece covers ballot fights over data center incentives and local approvals in the United States, and what those losses may mean for future project siting and tax deals. It is about community and taxation pressure on proposed projects, not a specific build.

A Storey County commissioner is defending continued data center growth and framing the projects as a source of revenue needed for county budgeting. The piece points to the local tradeoff between hosting more data center development and using that tax base to fund government operations.

Clarksville is moving ahead with a water plant overhaul, and Microsoft is paying for the work. The filing does not say in the excerpt how the plant will change operations, what water impacts are expected, or whether the arrangement includes any tax or land terms.

Ohio is being added to a larger wave of local resistance to data centers. The piece says ballot and policy pushes around disclosure and grid protection could shape how future projects are reviewed, but it does not describe a specific project commitment to land, water, taxes, or power.

The piece is about a county commission shake-up in Box Elder County after a data center dispute. It points to local political fallout from siting controversy, but the excerpt does not say anything about new project commitments on power, water, tax, or land.

Central Ohio voters are weighing local limits on data center development, with the dispute centered on how large these projects can be and what conditions they face. The excerpt points to a community and zoning fight, with the water and cooling issue also in view, but it does not specify any particular project commitments or deal terms.

Voters in Pataskala and Granville backed a ban on large data centers. The filing does not say whether any specific project was planned there, so the main effect is on future siting and local land use in those communities.

Urbana voters appear to have backed a ban on data centers and a recall of the mayor in the same election. The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center build and the community response around it.

A proposed large data center is moving into Cochise County, and the first community meeting is now on the calendar. The filing as presented does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the project, only that local residents will get a chance to hear about it.

The piece focuses on a Pennsylvania town weighing data center development, with residents split between opposition and support. It appears to center on local siting and community response, and the excerpt does not say whether the project has committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Campbell County and the concerns nearby residents are raising about it. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, and the source label suggests water and cooling are part of the concern, but it does not say the project’s full power, tax, or land terms.