Archive

The story says protests are continuing over a proposed Utah data center because of concern about water use tied to the Great Salt Lake. It is about a project’s local water burden and the community response, not about the operator’s business or the broader cloud market.

A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.

A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.

Wisconsin’s settlement would force a look at the environmental effects tied to data centers, so the story is about how a state dispute could shape future siting and review. The excerpt does not say which projects are covered, what impacts are being studied, or whether any permits or approvals change now.

Environmental advocates are raising concerns about the project’s water use and the tax incentives attached to it. The excerpt does not say whether the project has secured approvals, what the facility is, or how much water or money is involved.

Montana drought is prompting scrutiny of how data centers use water and whether those projects should face a formal review. The piece points to a state-level water issue tied to a proposed or existing data center footprint, but the excerpt does not say which project, what amount of water is involved, or what review process is being considered.

The piece is about a proposed New Jersey data center that would rely on diesel backup generation and the residents objecting to it. It squarely raises local community pushback and air-quality concerns tied to the site’s power setup.

The piece is about a proposed data center project in Cass County and the developer's pitch on local economic benefits and environmental safeguards. It appears to concern siting and local approval issues, with a water and environmental angle, but it does not say the project has been approved or built.

The piece appears to explain how data centers use water and correct common assumptions about where that water comes from or how it is used. It fits the water beat and points to Georgia as the local frame, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project or site.

Pennsylvania has put out a public tracker for data center permits while residents and advocates press environmental concerns. The piece is about state-level transparency around siting and the local pushback tied to water and environmental impacts.

The piece appears to cover how five Indiana data centers structured their projects to avoid federal water permitting, which puts the focus on water regulation and the local siting consequences for the host communities. It does not say in the excerpt which permits were avoided, what facilities were involved, or what conditions were attached to the projects.

The piece says a proposed data center in Silicon Valley is drawing concern over its power use and environmental effects. It points to a project that would affect the local host community through electricity demand and related impacts, but the excerpt does not say what land use approvals, water sourcing, tax terms, or utility commitments are in place.

This piece appears to be about the costs and tradeoffs local communities face when data centers need water and cooling support. The headline does not say which project, place, or operator is involved, so the filing details are not clear from the excerpt alone.

The piece says a Google data center project in Chesterfield has accumulated seven state environmental violations. It points to regulatory and environmental problems tied to the site, but the excerpt does not say whether the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments changed.

The piece is about a coal plant in Georgia that was expected to close but is remaining online as a power source for data center growth. It points to the electricity side of data center hosting and the local tradeoff of keeping legacy generation available for new load; the excerpt does not say who owns the plant, what terms keep it open, or whether water, tax, or land commitments changed.

A judge threw out a zoning lawsuit tied to Valara, while the South Carolina Environmental Law Center continues to challenge the project over formaldehyde concerns. The filing points to an active land-use and environmental dispute, but it does not say that the underlying project has been cancelled or approved.

Amazon is described as trying to advance nuclear power in Maryland after dropping a data center deal. The filing, as given, does not say that a new data center project is moving ahead, only that the company is now focused on power in the same state.

The piece concerns objections to an Indiana water draw from the Kankakee River. It points to a water-supply dispute with a clear local environmental and community angle, but the excerpt does not say what project or host site is driving the demand.

The piece is about local opposition to a proposed University of Michigan computing center in Ypsilanti and the environmental justice claims raised against it. It centers on a protest at a data-center-related siting dispute, not on the company’s operations or technical details.

The piece is about the water footprint of data centers and says investors are overlooking the biggest source of that use. It points to a water-and-cooling issue rather than a specific project, host community, or utility deal.

Amazon has cleared a water-related hurdle for a proposed data center campus near Houston. The filing points to a large project in Texas and to water and cooling as a key local issue, but it does not by itself say the project is built or that all other approvals are in hand.

Protesters are raising environmental concerns about a proposed data center and its local impacts. The filing excerpt points to community opposition, but it does not say what project commitments were made on power, water, land, tax terms, or approvals.