Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 2 of 5.
The piece ties a local recall election to a fight over a proposed data center in Piqua. It concerns community opposition and the local approval fight, not the operator’s finances or any technical buildout details.
Vineland residents are preparing a lawsuit over a data center’s use of natural gas engines that were not permitted. The piece centers on local opposition, regulatory compliance, and the project’s on-site power setup in New Jersey.
A judge ordered Talbot County to remove a data center text amendment from its zoning code. The piece is about local zoning control over where data centers can be approved in the county, not about power, water, or project financing.
A court denied a temporary restraining order in a Springfield lawsuit tied to the proposed data center moratorium. The filing appears to concern legal control over whether the project can move forward, but the excerpt does not say anything about power, water, tax terms, or land commitments by the developer.
The piece is about a proposed data center in Bessemer and a local dispute over whether construction should keep going. It centers on permitting, city action, and what QTS has or has not handed over to reporters or officials about the project.
The piece is about a proposed data center in East Whiteland and a new legal challenge tied to local opposition. It signals risk to the siting process, but the excerpt does not say what claims the lawsuit threat raises or whether any approvals, land, power, or water commitments have changed.
Residents in Ferguson are organizing a petition to force the city to repeal approval for a data center or send the question to voters. The piece is about local opposition and the use of direct political pressure over a proposed project, not about the operator’s finances or technical buildout.
Stafford supervisors voted to condemn land for a pipeline tied to reuse water for a data center. The filing says the county is using land condemnation to support water infrastructure for the project, but it does not say who will pay for the pipe, how much water the data center will use, or whether the site has other approvals in hand.
Residents in Goochland are still pushing back over a proposed data center project in the West Creek area, while a judge considers whether to dismiss the related TOD lawsuit. The filing points to an ongoing siting and legal dispute; it does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax, or land commitments.
Four Georgia families have filed suit alleging that construction of a Meta data center polluted their well water. The filing raises water, environmental, and legal questions about what the project may have done to nearby private wells, but the excerpt does not say whether the data center is operating or what specific contamination was found.
Residents are moving from opposition to legal action over a proposed 1.5 million-square-foot data center in East Whiteland. The filing appears to concern local approval and the project’s siting, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the developer has made on power, water, taxes, or land beyond the project size and location.
A judge let a Port Washington ordinance governing tax-increment financing for data centers remain in place. The piece is about a local tax and legal dispute over incentives tied to a proposed data center development, and it does not say the project secured power, water, or land commitments.
Wisconsin’s settlement would force a look at the environmental effects tied to data centers, so the story is about how a state dispute could shape future siting and review. The excerpt does not say which projects are covered, what impacts are being studied, or whether any permits or approvals change now.
The piece is about a local fight over a data center ordinance in Bridgewater and Raritan, where the mayor is responding to a lawsuit and the developer is trying to overturn the rule. It points to zoning and legal conflict around whether the project can proceed, but it does not say the filing adds any new commitments on power, water, tax, or land.
The piece says local bans and moratoriums have slowed only a small number of US data center projects, while most planned capacity still appears set to move ahead. It frames the issue as a siting and community opposition story, not a change in power, water, tax, or land commitments for any specific project.
The piece is about a dispute over public records tied to a proposed data center and a utility’s lawsuit against the person who shared them, along with two newspapers. It points to how project information, public access, and legal pressure can shape local oversight of data center development.
Goochland County Court is set to consider how data center land use should be handled locally. The filing points to a land-use dispute, but it does not say whether the county will approve, reject, or change any specific project.
A White County judge voided the rezoning that had cleared farmland for a proposed data center in Wolcott. The filing says the project is halted at the land-use stage and does not say anything about power, water, tax terms, or whether the developer has another site.
Texas attorney general sent letters to more than 150 proposed data center developments, including one in Nacogdoches County. The filing, as described here, does not say what commitments any project has made on land, power, water, taxes, or local approvals.
A Florida judge has blocked a hearing on an appeal tied to the proposed data center in Indiantown. The filing points to a legal fight over whether the project can move forward, but it does not say what the project itself would commit in land, power, water, or tax terms.
The story is about Texas data centers facing scrutiny over water use, with Harris County named as one of the places affected. It points to a legal and regulatory push by the state attorney general, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved, what remedies are being sought, or whether any filing has been made.
Texas is trying to use state enforcement tools against data center water use, and the headline says the case shows where current law runs out. The piece appears to focus on how much leverage Texas has over a project’s water and cooling demands, and what regulators can and cannot force operators to do.
The piece concerns an Oklahoma attorney general moving to intervene in a citizens’ lawsuit tied to a proposed data center in Sand Springs. It is about local opposition and the legal fight around whether the project can move ahead, not about the project’s power, water, or tax terms.
Hood County turned down a proposed settlement tied to the Comanche Circle data center and also rejected the permit appeal. The piece is about local land-use and legal conflict over whether the project can move ahead in Hood County, Texas, and it does not say what new water, power, tax, or land terms, if any, were on the table beyond the dispute itself.
Two groups have sued Franklin County over approvals tied to data center projects and are asking the court to stop permits from moving forward. The filing puts local opposition and the county’s siting process at the center of the dispute; it does not say what specific power, water, tax, or land commitments the projects include.