Archive

A judge is weighing whether residents in Grayslake may have missed the deadline to challenge a data center dispute, while also flagging a possible due process issue. The piece is about the legal fight around a proposed data center and the local opposition to it, not about the project’s power, water, or tax terms.

A Michigan township is considering rezoning a large tract of land, and the question is whether that change would make a data center possible. The filing, as presented here, does not say the project is approved, who the developer is, or what commitments it would require on power, water, or taxes.

The piece appears to focus on a Wisconsin data center and on efforts to shape public opinion around it through paid social media promotion. It points to a community-facing campaign around a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the filing or developer discloses land, power, water, or tax terms.

Indianapolis officials are set to review a large property tax incentive package for DC Blox tied to a data center project on the city’s east side. The filing says the proposal is about tax relief; it does not say the project’s power needs, water use, land assembly details, or whether the incentive has been approved.

The piece is about a local agreement between Graham and a data center developer, with the excerpt pointing to tax abatements and incentives. It appears to concern what the project will receive from the host community, but the excerpt does not say what site, power, water, or land terms were included.

The piece covers ballot fights over data center incentives and local approvals in the United States, and what those losses may mean for future project siting and tax deals. It is about community and taxation pressure on proposed projects, not a specific build.

Ohio is being added to a larger wave of local resistance to data centers. The piece says ballot and policy pushes around disclosure and grid protection could shape how future projects are reviewed, but it does not describe a specific project commitment to land, water, taxes, or power.

Voters in Pataskala and Granville backed a ban on large data centers. The filing does not say whether any specific project was planned there, so the main effect is on future siting and local land use in those communities.

Urbana voters appear to have backed a ban on data centers and a recall of the mayor in the same election. The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center build and the community response around it.

The piece says PJM has revised its data center backstop procurement plan and that ICF sees the change as lowering utility risk. It is about power-market rules for large loads and how those rules affect utilities in PJM territory.

The piece says Microsoft’s proposed Indiana data center has cleared another procedural step, with groundwater approval and air permit review moving ahead. It does not say the project is built, how much power or water it will use, or what tax or land terms are attached.

The piece focuses on a Pennsylvania town weighing data center development, with residents split between opposition and support. It appears to center on local siting and community response, and the excerpt does not say whether the project has committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.

The piece summarizes public opposition to data center proposals, with water concerns showing up most often in the comments and meeting records. It also suggests many local discussions proceed without visible project supporters, but it does not identify a specific site, utility deal, land action, or approval outcome.

The filing points to state review of gas-fueled power for a proposed 2 GW data center at Shippingport. It concerns electricity supply and the siting of a large load in western Pennsylvania, but it does not say the project is approved or fully built.

Alliant Energy is describing a future power-supply deal pipeline for data centers in Wisconsin. The filing or excerpt does not say which projects are involved, how much land or water they would need, whether any approvals are pending, or what costs would land on customers or local governments.

State regulators are pushing back on a MISO proposal that would spread large-load costs more broadly, which puts the dispute in the rates and regulation lane. The piece is about how cost allocation for large power users would land on utilities and customers in the Midwest region; it does not describe a specific data center site or a local project approval.

The piece is about local opposition to data center development in Iowa and the concerns driving that pushback. Based on the headline and section label, water and cooling are part of the dispute, along with community resistance to siting these projects.

The piece is about Hagerstown considering annexing 171 acres, with data center use drawing most of the public opposition. It centers on siting and local land-use decisions, with a community reaction angle.

Olyphant is weighing a proposed settlement in a data center lawsuit, with the dispute centered on how the project is handled locally and what the deal would resolve. The filing does not say what the underlying project commitments were beyond the litigation amount, or how any settlement would affect power, water, land use, or taxes.

Local leaders in Alton heard strong public opposition to a proposed data center. The filing points to a siting and community conflict, but it does not say whether the project has cleared any land-use, power, or water approvals.

New York officials are reviewing a proposed data center with attention to utility costs, water use, and neighborhood effects. The filing, as described, points to community and resource questions rather than a confirmed build decision, and it does not state any final site approval or cost terms.

The piece says local opposition is linked to most of the delayed or canceled U.S. data center projects cited by S&P. It points to community resistance as a material siting risk, but the excerpt does not say which projects, places, or project commitments were involved.