Archive
(178 Total Articles)Page 2 of 2.
A French company is proposing a large data center project in Frankfort, Indiana. The headline and excerpt point to a planned AI-oriented facility and a large dollar figure, but they do not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments are attached.
The piece is about proposed federal legislation on data centers and how their electricity costs are passed through to ratepayers. It matters for utility customers and developers because it would shape who pays for new large-load demand, but the excerpt does not say what the bill actually requires in detail.
The piece says a Wisconsin family sold land in Port Washington for far above its fair-market value, and that developers have already assembled more than 1,500 acres around a proposed 672-acre data center site. It points to land assembly and the money committed to control the site, but it does not say what power, water, tax, or permit terms the project has secured.
The story is about federal legislation aimed at preventing AI data center power costs from being passed through to ordinary consumers. It concerns who pays for the electricity needed to serve large new loads, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project or host site.
Google is identified as the end user for the proposed Project Clydesdale data center campus in Tulsa County. The excerpt does not say what the project has secured on land, power, water, tax treatment, or local approvals, so those commitments are not clear from this filing.
This is about an orbital data center project, not a terrestrial siting, power, water, or tax dispute. The excerpt says StarDetect is building an orbital constellation and has GPUs in orbit, but it does not say what land, utility, or public-fiscal commitments any host community is taking on.
The council declined to revisit a data center agreement, which keeps the deal in place for now. The excerpt does not say what project terms were under review, what concessions were attached, or whether the decision involved land, power, water, or tax treatment.
New York is considering a community investment requirement tied to data center size, with the burden framed as dollars per megawatt. The excerpt does not say whether this is a passed rule, a proposal, or how it would be enforced.
The piece is about Texas data center jobs and the lack of a public statewide count. On the excerpt provided, it points to the jobs and incentives side of data center development in Texas, but it does not say how many jobs any specific project promises or what tax deal is attached.
The item appears to be about data center companies holding talks in Port Washington, which points to local project siting and possible incentives discussion. The excerpt does not say what was proposed, whether any land, power, water, or tax commitment was made, or what the companies asked for.
New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill aimed at setting a large-load tariff for data centers. The filing does not say how the tariff would work in practice, which projects it would cover, or how costs would be assigned.
The piece is about a Duke Energy tariff fight in Florida and how it could affect what data center load pays for under utility rate rules. It centers on power costs and ratepayer protections, not on a specific project buildout.
A data center has broken ground near a former coal plant campus in Beaver County. The filing says the project is happening at a specific site, but it does not say what power deal, water source, tax package, or land-use approval is attached to it.
St. Louis approved a Midtown data center plan that is tied to projected tax revenue for the city over the next decade. The filing says what the project could contribute in tax terms, but it does not spell out the land deal, power supply, water use, or any clawback terms in the excerpt provided.
DeKalb County has halted a proposed 1 million-square-foot data center plan. The piece is about local siting and permitting in Georgia, and it also points to another data center proposal surfacing elsewhere in the state, but the excerpt does not say whether the project involved power, water, tax terms, or land assembly details.
Montana lawmakers are preparing a bill that would shift some of the cost and risk of data center power demand away from ordinary ratepayers. The filing points to state policy around who pays for large-load electricity service, but it does not say there is a specific project approval or a named site in this excerpt.
The piece is about how data center growth can affect electric bills and utility rates for South Carolina customers. It appears to focus on the power cost side of hosting new load, not on a specific project or site.