Archive
(169 Total Articles)Page 2 of 2.
The piece is about Indiana weighing how data center growth would affect its energy system and the local deal-making around hosting those projects. The headline and excerpt point to policy and incentive questions, but they do not say which project is involved or what specific commitments were made.
A French company is proposing a large data center project in Frankfort, Indiana. The headline and excerpt point to a planned AI-oriented facility and a large dollar figure, but they do not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments are attached.
The piece is about proposed federal legislation on data centers and how their electricity costs are passed through to ratepayers. It matters for utility customers and developers because it would shape who pays for new large-load demand, but the excerpt does not say what the bill actually requires in detail.
The story is about federal legislation aimed at preventing AI data center power costs from being passed through to ordinary consumers. It concerns who pays for the electricity needed to serve large new loads, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project or host site.
The piece is about an Upper Burrell data center plan and the rule that the project must bring its own gas-fired power. That puts the focus on project siting and power, with local opposition and moratorium politics in the background.
A county in southern Virginia rejected a proposed buildout that paired 12 data centers with a large gas plant. The filing says residents organized against it and the county board voted it down; it does not say the project won any land, water, tax, or power approvals.
This is about an orbital data center project, not a terrestrial siting, power, water, or tax dispute. The excerpt says StarDetect is building an orbital constellation and has GPUs in orbit, but it does not say what land, utility, or public-fiscal commitments any host community is taking on.
New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill aimed at setting a large-load tariff for data centers. The filing does not say how the tariff would work in practice, which projects it would cover, or how costs would be assigned.
Duke Energy is proposing separate utility rules for data centers in North Carolina. The piece is about how a utility would structure service terms for a specific class of large load in the state, not about a single project being built.
Duke Energy is said to be considering a large-load tariff that stays light on requirements for big power users. The piece appears to focus on how that pricing approach could affect who pays for the added grid burden in Duke's territory.
North Carolina officials say they will enforce a new federal pledge tied to Duke Energy’s data center load. The filing points to power and tariff rules, not a specific site or construction commitment.
Five US grid operators are asking for more time on FERC’s deadline for handling data center power requests. The filing, as described here, concerns how utilities and grid operators manage large-load interconnection and tariff rules, not a specific project site or commitment.
The piece is about a Duke Energy tariff fight in Florida and how it could affect what data center load pays for under utility rate rules. It centers on power costs and ratepayer protections, not on a specific project buildout.
A data center has broken ground near a former coal plant campus in Beaver County. The filing says the project is happening at a specific site, but it does not say what power deal, water source, tax package, or land-use approval is attached to it.
The House is set to consider a bill that would try to limit how much data center electricity demand is passed through to other customers. The excerpt does not say which projects, utilities, or states would be covered, or what specific cost rule the bill would change.
Montana lawmakers are preparing a bill that would shift some of the cost and risk of data center power demand away from ordinary ratepayers. The filing points to state policy around who pays for large-load electricity service, but it does not say there is a specific project approval or a named site in this excerpt.
The piece is about how data center growth can affect electric bills and utility rates for South Carolina customers. It appears to focus on the power cost side of hosting new load, not on a specific project or site.
FERC is telling New York’s grid operator to change its tariff so data center projects can move through interconnection more quickly. The filing is about power access and the rules that govern it; it does not say which projects will get built, what they will cost hosts, or whether any specific site has been approved.
The piece is about a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order that would require grid operators to rewrite interconnection and tariff rules for large data center loads. It concerns how new data center demand is handled on the power side, not a specific site, land deal, or water commitment.
The piece says Savannah River Site is slated to host a proposed 1-gigawatt data center, which puts the story in siting and power. The excerpt does not say what land deal, water plan, tax package, interconnection terms, or local approvals are attached to the project.
Brookfield is said to be planning a large data center campus at the DOE’s Kentucky nuclear enrichment site. The filing or report, as given, does not say how the project will be powered, whether it will use water, what land or tax terms are involved, or what local approvals are still needed.
PJM is broadening its response to growing data center load as capacity problems in its region worsen. The piece points to power-system planning and interconnection pressure on large loads, not to a specific project filing or local siting deal.
Pennsylvania regulators are asking whether the state’s grid can absorb more data center load without hurting reliability. The piece centers on power planning for a proposed buildout, with the public utility commission and PJM in the background, and it does not say that any specific project has won final approval or secured power.