Archive

The piece concerns a push to site data centers on public land and the political scrutiny around that idea. It appears to focus on federal land use, approval politics, and the public-interest questions around who controls the site and what the government is being asked to allow.

The piece is about how election results could affect Texas tax treatment for data centers. It is about a possible change in money policy, not a specific project commitment, and it does not say which project or local deal would change.

Duke Energy says it did not sign any new data center customers in the quarter because a tariff review is slowing large-load dealmaking. The piece is about how utility rate design and interconnection terms affect where data center load can be added in Duke’s territory.

The piece covers ballot fights over data center incentives and local approvals in the United States, and what those losses may mean for future project siting and tax deals. It is about community and taxation pressure on proposed projects, not a specific build.

The piece is about Texas state policy on data center siting, specifically a promised continuation of a moratorium and more legislation. It affects where projects can be approved in Texas and what rules developers would have to follow, but the excerpt does not say which projects, counties, or specific provisions are involved.

The piece is about Texas data center developers facing a new dispute over power, with the immediate risk framed around a very large amount of planned load. It points to a project-level electricity problem in Texas, not a cloud software or chip story, and it does not say the projects are canceled.

Oregon voters approved a charter amendment that restricts data centers, which is a local land-use and regulatory action affecting where projects can be built. The excerpt does not say what limits the amendment imposes, whether any specific project is affected, or how it changes power, water, or tax commitments.

The Florida Public Service Commission rejected Duke Energy’s proposed data center plan, so the project does not yet have the regulatory green light it would need to move forward. The filing, as described here, centers on power and utility regulation in Florida; it does not say what specific load, tariff terms, land setup, or water arrangement were involved.

The piece says PJM has revised its data center backstop procurement plan and that ICF sees the change as lowering utility risk. It is about power-market rules for large loads and how those rules affect utilities in PJM territory.

The piece says Microsoft’s proposed Indiana data center has cleared another procedural step, with groundwater approval and air permit review moving ahead. It does not say the project is built, how much power or water it will use, or what tax or land terms are attached.

The piece is about a proposed Senate bill that could shift a large cost onto data center operators. It is a policy and taxation story about who would bear the financial burden, not a report on a specific site or project.

The piece is about OpenAI floating a plan for data center power plants and how that would affect the local grid and nearby communities. It does not say that a specific project has been approved, built, or funded, and it does not give project-level details on site, water use, tax terms, or land.

The filing points to state review of gas-fueled power for a proposed 2 GW data center at Shippingport. It concerns electricity supply and the siting of a large load in western Pennsylvania, but it does not say the project is approved or fully built.

A judge let a lawsuit proceed over pollution from the Mississippi facility tied to xAI and SpaceX. The filing says the plant uses gas turbines and alleges the site has significant nitrogen oxide and formaldehyde emissions, but it does not say the project has been halted or that any permit outcome has changed.

Larimer County is asking residents for input as it writes rules for data centers. The excerpt does not say what the proposed rules would require on land use, power, water, taxes, or approvals, beyond the public comment process itself.

State regulators are pushing back on a MISO proposal that would spread large-load costs more broadly, which puts the dispute in the rates and regulation lane. The piece is about how cost allocation for large power users would land on utilities and customers in the Midwest region; it does not describe a specific data center site or a local project approval.

The piece says local opposition is linked to most of the delayed or canceled U.S. data center projects cited by S&P. It points to community resistance as a material siting risk, but the excerpt does not say which projects, places, or project commitments were involved.

The piece is about two data center operators saying they will provide more disclosure about their facilities and operations. It does not describe a new site, a permit, power or water commitment, or a local deal.

Kirksville is setting rules for where data centers can go and how their environmental impacts will be reviewed. The story is about local land-use control and environmental oversight, not a specific project commitment to power, water, tax breaks, or a named site package.

The piece is about a proposed Ohio data center-related power plant vote and a push to delay it. It centers on regulatory timing and future power costs, which affects the host community and utility planning more than the operator itself.

Howell Township is scheduling a public hearing on a proposed data center ordinance. The filing points to local zoning and community process, but it does not say what standards the ordinance would set or whether any specific project is proposed.

Houston is weighing pressure to regulate AI data centres as backlash grows, but the piece says local officials are resisting legislation. The story is about how the city and its residents are responding to the siting and oversight of a data centre buildout, not about the operator’s business.