Archive
(169 Total Articles)Page 2 of 4.
The Fauquier County Planning Commission is recommending a change to local rules that would tighten limits on data center development. The piece is about county-level land use and zoning control over where data centers can be built, not a specific project commitment to power, water, or tax terms.
The piece is about Project Jupiter in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, and the fight over its data center footprint, with water and air scrutiny still in play after a state court setback. It says the legal loss did not end the broader local battle over whether and how the project can move ahead.
The piece explains how land can be treated as "powered" only after grid connection work is far enough along, which fits the publication’s power and siting coverage. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, place, utility, or developer commitment beyond the general concept of grid connection stages.
The piece is about a large data center being built in an Ohio town that is under economic strain. The excerpt points to the project’s cooling and water implications, but it does not say what power source, tax deal, land package, or local approvals are attached to it.
Florida candidates are weighing in as data center projects continue to move through the state. The piece is about where these facilities are being built or proposed and the local political dispute around them, not about the operators' finances or cloud products.
The piece says Pennsylvania’s abandoned mines and waste-heat reuse could be part of how new data centers in the state reduce their cooling footprint. It points to siting and water-side implications for a local buildout, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved or what commitments any developer has already made.
Wilmington’s select board is considering a local prohibition on large data centers. That is a siting and zoning decision for the town, and the filing does not say which project would be affected or what power, water, tax, or land terms are on the table.
A developer is suing Upper Merion Township after the township rejected proposed data center projects in King of Prussia. The filing points to a land-use and local approval fight; it does not say the township committed power, water, tax terms, or other project support.
The piece points to a possible federal push to use public land for data centers and, by implication, the land and permitting questions that would follow. The excerpt does not say which sites are involved, what agencies would control the land, or whether any project has been approved.
The piece is a timeline of Project Jupiter in New Mexico, so it appears to track how the project developed over time and what the local hosts were asked to provide. From the source label and headline alone, the clearest covered issue is water and cooling, but the excerpt does not say what commitments were actually made or whether power, land, or public subsidies were also part of it.
The piece is about legal challenges tied to a proposed data center in Birmingham. It concerns the local siting fight and the community pushback around the project, and the excerpt does not say how the lawsuits may resolve or what project commitments are being contested.
The piece is about a local data center dispute centered on public opposition and the city’s handling of comment on the project. It says the city released critical emails, social media posts, and voicemails after a brief pause on public comment, but it does not describe the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The piece says the Broadview-area project has entered an initial construction phase and that the work now includes roads and well development. That puts the story on land preparation and water use for a proposed data center site in Montana, while it does not say anything about power supply, tax terms, or public approvals.
Residents in Adelanto and the High Desert are opposing proposed data center amendments. The filing points to local community resistance around how the project would move forward, but it does not say whether any amendment was adopted or spell out the project's power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The piece is about a proposed data center project near Saline and the local approvals and incentives tied to it. The excerpt points to tax abatements and other public support, but it does not say what land, power, water, or community commitments the project makes.
Sacramento officials and local activists are debating whether data centers should be built in the city and what those facilities would mean for water use and other community impacts. The piece appears to cover the local political argument rather than a specific approved project.
Central Illinois counties are moving ahead with rules for data centers. The filing points to local regulation and siting decisions, but it does not say what specific project, land commitment, power setup, or water deal is affected.
A public poll in Montana finds broad voter opposition to new data centers. The piece is about local political resistance, not a specific project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The proposal is no longer just a geothermal project; it now also contemplates data centers at the Rangely site. The excerpt does not say whether the filing adds power commitments, water use, tax terms, land assembly, or approvals, so those details remain unstated.
An environmental group is seeking an injunction in a dispute with Spartanburg County over a proposed data center. The filing and the headline point to a local siting and community fight, but do not say how the county, land, power, water, or incentives would be committed if the project goes ahead.
This is about New Mexico officials and advocates pushing back on the state’s data center buildout, with the excerpt pointing to water and cooling as the main issue. It appears to cover how the boom would affect local resources and what policy response is being proposed, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved or what specific rules the plan would change.
A Jefferson County judge has merged lawsuits tied to Birmingham's Nebius AI Factory site. The dispute centers on zoning and construction impacts, so it is a local siting and community fight rather than a project financing or utility story.
Philadelphia residents are asking city officials to pause data center activity instead of creating a task force. The piece is about local opposition and how residents want the city to handle proposed development.
Residents in Nutley are organizing a petition to block a proposed data center on Kingsland Street. The piece is about local community opposition to a specific siting proposal; it does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, utility deals, or a final decision.
The piece is about a proposed waterfront data center near the Ventura County Fairgrounds and the public concern it raised. From the headline and excerpt, the board’s action appears to be aimed at easing those concerns, but the filing does not say whether the project needs land approvals, power commitments, water supply, tax terms, or other project obligations.