Archive

The story is about a proposed expansion of a small data center in Milwaukee by the Potawatomi tribe. Based on the headline and excerpt, it does not say what the project would commit the host to in power, water, tax, or land terms, or whether any approvals or financing details have been filed.

The story is about a proposed AI data center that would draw on the Blackfoot River and the local resistance it encountered in a Montana town. It concerns water use and community pushback over where the project would be built and what it would take from the place hosting it.

QTS is responding to local objections over noise and lighting tied to its proposed large data center project in York County. The filing or reporting shown here centers on community pushback and the company’s attempt to address those concerns, not on water use or any approved project terms.

Ohio ballot measures on data centers have been rejected in a string of local votes. The piece is about community opposition and siting fights over where these projects can be built in the state.

The piece is about opposition to a proposed data center from neighbors who live near it. The excerpt points to a local conflict over the project’s effects on the surrounding area, especially noise and community impact, but it does not say what the developer has committed on power, water, taxes, or land.

Cromwell is holding a public hearing on its data center dispute, which points to a local decision-making fight rather than a completed project. The filing does not say which project is proposed, what the town may approve or deny, or whether any power, water, tax, or land deal is attached.

Thirteen townships in Jackson County have moved to pause AI data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning resistance, and it affects where projects could be approved rather than any specific power, water, or tax commitment.

An environmental group is organizing a protest in Penn Yan and pressing for a moratorium on data center development in Torrey. The filing says the group is focused on stopping or delaying the project, but it does not describe any power, water, tax, or land commitment by the developer.

A developer is asking a court to make Springfield review proposed data center plans while the city’s moratorium is in place. The dispute is about whether the project can move through local review, so the immediate effects fall on siting and the city’s permitting process, not on power, water, or tax terms that the excerpt does not mention.

The story is about a lawsuit tied to alleged bot activity around opposition to a proposed Ferguson data center. It concerns the community fight over siting, with a legal dispute over how that opposition was carried out.

A judge is weighing whether residents in Grayslake may have missed the deadline to challenge a data center dispute, while also flagging a possible due process issue. The piece is about the legal fight around a proposed data center and the local opposition to it, not about the project’s power, water, or tax terms.

The piece concerns a push to site data centers on public land and the political scrutiny around that idea. It appears to focus on federal land use, approval politics, and the public-interest questions around who controls the site and what the government is being asked to allow.

A Michigan township is considering rezoning a large tract of land, and the question is whether that change would make a data center possible. The filing, as presented here, does not say the project is approved, who the developer is, or what commitments it would require on power, water, or taxes.

The story is about an LDS Church-owned ranchland lease for a proposed data center, which puts the land-use and siting question ahead of any built facility. The excerpt does not say the project has secured power, water, tax relief, or approvals, so those pieces remain unspecified.

Indianapolis officials are set to review a large property tax incentive package for DC Blox tied to a data center project on the city’s east side. The filing says the proposal is about tax relief; it does not say the project’s power needs, water use, land assembly details, or whether the incentive has been approved.

A developer has filed plans to convert existing warehouse buildings in Auburndale, Florida, into a data center. The filing points to a reuse of land and buildings, but the excerpt does not say what power supply, water use, tax treatment, or local approvals are attached to the project.

The piece is about Texas state policy on data center siting, specifically a promised continuation of a moratorium and more legislation. It affects where projects can be approved in Texas and what rules developers would have to follow, but the excerpt does not say which projects, counties, or specific provisions are involved.

The piece is about a county commission shake-up in Box Elder County after a data center dispute. It points to local political fallout from siting controversy, but the excerpt does not say anything about new project commitments on power, water, tax, or land.

Voters in Pataskala and Granville backed a ban on large data centers. The filing does not say whether any specific project was planned there, so the main effect is on future siting and local land use in those communities.

Urbana voters appear to have backed a ban on data centers and a recall of the mayor in the same election. The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center build and the community response around it.

A proposed large data center is moving into Cochise County, and the first community meeting is now on the calendar. The filing as presented does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the project, only that local residents will get a chance to hear about it.

The piece focuses on a Pennsylvania town weighing data center development, with residents split between opposition and support. It appears to center on local siting and community response, and the excerpt does not say whether the project has committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.