Archive

A proposed large data center is moving into Cochise County, and the first community meeting is now on the calendar. The filing as presented does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the project, only that local residents will get a chance to hear about it.

Amazon is proposing a large data center campus in West Richland, with the filing describing a possible buildout of up to 21 buildings. The piece points to local impacts through jobs and likely utility use, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project has actually secured.

Larimer County is asking residents for input as it writes rules for data centers. The excerpt does not say what the proposed rules would require on land use, power, water, taxes, or approvals, beyond the public comment process itself.

TerraVolt is planning a 240 MW data center campus in Idaho and says it would be behind the meter. The excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments come with the project.

The piece says a proposed underwater data center in Alaska would rely on more than 300 tidal turbines. It also flags the project’s possible conflict with endangered belugas, but the excerpt does not say who is backing it, whether it has permits, or what it would cost in power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about a proposed AI campus on 747 acres with nine buildings and a very large electricity demand, which puts siting and power use at the center of the project. The excerpt does not say whether the project has utility approvals, water agreements, tax incentives, or zoning outcomes.

The piece says local opposition is linked to most of the delayed or canceled U.S. data center projects cited by S&P. It points to community resistance as a material siting risk, but the excerpt does not say which projects, places, or project commitments were involved.

The piece is about data center-driven water demand in Arizona and how that pressure affects local water supplies. It appears to connect AI infrastructure with utility and cooling use in the state, but the excerpt does not specify a particular project, operator, or financing deal.

A proposed data center is the subject of a health-impact study, and the developer’s side disputes the study’s conclusions. The filing, as described here, concerns the water and cooling implications of a specific project and the public controversy around it, not an operating facility.

San Diego city officials delayed a proposed data center after residents spoke against it at City Council. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, but it does not say what commitments the project made on land, power, water, taxes, or approvals beyond the delay.

The story is about cargo theft on highways that affects shipments headed to data centers, not a data center project itself. It touches the supply chain around buildouts, but it does not say anything about a specific site, power, water, tax, land, or approvals.

New Mexico State University students and organizers are pressing for a statewide ban on data centers. The piece is about organized opposition and proposed state-level regulation in New Mexico, not a specific project filing or approval.

The piece appears to concern another proposed gas-fired plant tied to data center development, alongside a gas pipeline expansion that would support it. It is about siting and power infrastructure in Nevada, and it does not say whether the project has been approved or what specific community costs would fall on local residents.

The piece is about a rural Nevada data center and the local governments that are still backing it despite local opposition. The filing points to a community fight over whether the project should go forward and what it could mean for water use and local decision-making; it does not, from the excerpt, specify the project's full power, tax, or land terms.

The piece says Gradiant will supply water for a proposed data center in West Texas. It does not say how much water the project will use, where it will be built, or what other local commitments or approvals are involved.

Dixon's City Council unanimously adopted a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center and battery storage applications, even with no project yet filed.

Dixon's council froze data center and battery storage applications for 45 days on September 30, 2026, with no project yet filed and a threshold far below the state's new reporting floor.

The piece says a proposed AI data center tied to a San Francisco mall is running into power and permitting obstacles. It points to siting and utility constraints, but the excerpt does not say what power source, water use, tax deal, or land transaction is actually in place.

Natrona County and Prometheus Hyperscale are discussing a new AI complex and whether it can avoid state-level review. The filing points to a siting and regulatory issue in Wyoming, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project has made.

Colorado regulators are set to review Xcel's proposed data center tariff and decide whether it shields other customers from the costs tied to large new loads. The piece is about utility rate design and public oversight in Colorado, not about a specific data center site being built.

Umatilla is weighing an emergency response to a projected loss of revenue tied to Oregon’s pause on a data center permit. The piece is about how a local government is reacting to a project-level permitting change and the money it expects to lose, not about the operator’s business plans.

The piece says data center growth is affecting a school bond estimate and shaping funding on both sides of the river. It points to local tax and public-finance effects tied to new data center development, not to the project’s power, water, or land commitments.