Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 22 of 30.
A Wisconsin report looks at how the state could replace property tax revenue lost through data center incentives. The piece is about the fiscal tradeoff for local governments and the tax side of hosting a data center, not a specific build decision.
Developers are discussing a proposed data center near Mahomet and saying it would not add to local energy or water demand. The filing or reporting leaves open community concern about that claim and does not show a final approval or a committed utility deal.
The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center project and the efforts to keep protests going. It centers on community resistance, not on the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.
Aurora is being considered for additional data center development. The filing does not say what specific sites, utility commitments, tax terms, or community approvals are attached to the proposal.
The piece is about a Wisconsin Rapids politician facing fallout over an email tied to anti-data center signs. It concerns local opposition politics around a proposed data center, not the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.
A local forum in Casper exposed that residents still lack basic information about a proposed data center and its likely effects. The piece is about community transparency around a specific project, and it does not say the filing has resolved the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.
Europe and the UAE are said to be planning a proposed orbital data center with 50 connected computers and a shared model-selection layer for satellite-sensor data. The filing does not say what land, water, tax, or local utility commitments, if any, the project would require on Earth.
The piece is about what a county can bargain over when a data center is proposed, with the emphasis on local leverage rather than the operator’s pitch. It points to community-facing terms such as land use, permits, and likely utility or tax issues, but the excerpt does not say which specific deal points were actually on the table.
The piece says the governor nominee would issue a moratorium on data centers if elected. That makes it a siting and regulation story in New Mexico, with the local political fight centered on whether new projects should be paused.
Protesters are raising environmental concerns about a proposed data center and its local impacts. The filing excerpt points to community opposition, but it does not say what project commitments were made on power, water, land, tax terms, or approvals.
Mahomet is reopening talks over a possible data center after having turned away an earlier prospect. The filing does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning terms are under discussion, so the project details remain unspecified.
The filing says Lambda plans an AI data center in Mayes County and ties it to a large tax impact. The excerpt does not say what land, power, or water commitments are included, or whether any local approvals or incentives are already in place.
The piece appears to be about a proposed data center project in Amber, Oklahoma, and the claim that it is unlikely to be stopped. The excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, taxes, or land, or what objections, approvals, or legal steps are driving that conclusion.
The piece is about backlash to Virginia data center siting, with the focus on public opposition and what it says about how people are responding to those projects. It does not describe a specific new project commitment on land, power, water, or tax terms in the excerpt provided.
The piece is about local protest against Project Midspan. It points to community opposition to a proposed project, but the excerpt does not say what the project is, where it would be built, or what commitments it carries for power, water, tax, or land.
A South Carolina law firm is asking regulators to revisit a decision tied to a proposed Spartanburg data center. The piece is about the legal and regulatory fight around siting a project in the state, and it does not say the project has been approved, built, or that the filing changed any project terms.
Residents in Upper Burrell are organizing around local rules for a proposed data center. The piece centers on siting and community opposition in a Pennsylvania fracking area, and it does not say the project has secured approvals or committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.
Church groups are asking Microsoft to commit a small share of data center costs, and the company has gone quiet instead of answering in public. The piece is about who should pay for a project’s water- and cooling-related costs, and what the developer has not said about that request.
A Michigan survey found residents have strong views about data centers. The piece is about public reaction to proposed data center development, which affects community acceptance and local siting politics rather than a specific power, water, or tax deal.
Xcel Energy is proposing a tariff or billing change meant to keep data center-related power costs from being shifted onto ordinary customers. The piece is about how a utility is handling large-load cost allocation in its service territory, not about a specific project site.
The piece is about a data center project in Shippingport and the local reaction around it as construction begins. It points to siting and community conflict, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project actually carries.
A California firm says it intends to build a data center at Chouteau, Oklahoma. The filing excerpt does not say what land has been assembled, what power or water supply has been arranged, or whether the proposal has local approvals.
The Kentucky legislature is holding a listening session on data centers, which puts the issue in the public record but does not itself approve or deny a project. The excerpt does not say whether any specific site, utility deal, zoning action, or tax package is on the table.
The piece says MARA put down a large deposit and is revising a Texas data center agreement while the site is under audit. It points to a project-level financing and oversight issue, but the excerpt does not say what changed in the deal or what the audit found.
Brighton residents are opposing a proposed large data center complex near homes. The filing as described is about local resistance and land-use conflict; it does not state any power, water, tax, or land-assembly commitments by the developer.



