Archive

The item says the county board is sending moratorium resolutions to the Planning Commission. That signals a local land-use pause and shows the county is considering limits on future development, but the excerpt does not say what kind of projects the moratorium would affect or what rules would change.

Vineland residents are preparing a lawsuit over a data center’s use of natural gas engines that were not permitted. The piece centers on local opposition, regulatory compliance, and the project’s on-site power setup in New Jersey.

A judge ordered Talbot County to remove a data center text amendment from its zoning code. The piece is about local zoning control over where data centers can be approved in the county, not about power, water, or project financing.

The piece is about a proposed state bill that would set rules for data centers in order to shield nearby residents and utility customers. It points to public concerns over how large projects affect water use, utility bills, and local oversight, but the excerpt does not say which project or county is directly involved.

A South Shore town has put a hold on data center development, which puts local siting and zoning decisions at the center of the story. The piece appears to focus on what the pause means for future approvals and for residents weighing the project locally.

The piece is about local opposition in Culpeper to data center development and the push for a moratorium. It affects county land-use decisions and the siting of future projects, but the excerpt does not say anything about a specific project committing land, power, water, or tax terms.

Irondale’s mayor is saying the city will not impose a ban on data centers and will instead look at regulations. The piece is about local siting rules and how the city plans to control future projects, but it does not say what specific requirements are being considered.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Bessemer and a local dispute over whether construction should keep going. It centers on permitting, city action, and what QTS has or has not handed over to reporters or officials about the project.

Amazon is addressing a change in its stance on where future data centers may be developed in Northern Virginia. The story appears to center on siting and local development issues, with the details of any power, water, or land commitments not stated in the excerpt.

Suffolk has kept a local ban on data centers in place, but the headline says that restriction is temporary rather than permanent. The piece is about local zoning and regulation affecting whether data centers can be built in the city.

Microsoft has filed paperwork for a proposed data center campus in Floyd County, Georgia. The filing points to a siting and local-approval story; the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments are included, or whether any were already secured.

The piece concerns a public forum in Southwest Virginia where data center developers are expected to face questions from local residents and officials. It appears to focus on community discussion around a proposed data center project, not on a committed power, water, tax, or land deal.

Stafford supervisors voted to condemn land for a pipeline tied to reuse water for a data center. The filing says the county is using land condemnation to support water infrastructure for the project, but it does not say who will pay for the pipe, how much water the data center will use, or whether the site has other approvals in hand.

Calvert County officials were not brought into a proposed Constellation-Amazon power arrangement tied to Calvert Cliffs. The piece is about local political pushback and the lack of consultation around an energy deal that could affect the county.

Residents in Goochland are still pushing back over a proposed data center project in the West Creek area, while a judge considers whether to dismiss the related TOD lawsuit. The filing points to an ongoing siting and legal dispute; it does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax, or land commitments.

Savannah and Chatham County are set to consider a data center ordinance alongside updates to the 2040 comprehensive plan. The excerpt does not say what the ordinance would change, whether any project is named, or what commitments on land, power, water, or tax relief are on the table.

Four Georgia families have filed suit alleging that construction of a Meta data center polluted their well water. The filing raises water, environmental, and legal questions about what the project may have done to nearby private wells, but the excerpt does not say whether the data center is operating or what specific contamination was found.

Loudoun County ended plans for a proposed Amazon data center after community opposition. The filing, as described here, does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments were tied to the project or what specific concessions were under discussion.

The piece is about Memphis residents pushing back against a proposed data center buildout and the pollution concerns tied to it. It focuses on local opposition and the city’s debate over whether to pause or limit that development.

Louisville council is taking another look at proposed rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and how the city may shape future data center siting and operations.

Ormond Beach has turned a data center ban into formal local policy. The piece concerns land use rules and local regulation, not a project buildout or utility commitment.

Residents are moving from opposition to legal action over a proposed 1.5 million-square-foot data center in East Whiteland. The filing appears to concern local approval and the project’s siting, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the developer has made on power, water, taxes, or land beyond the project size and location.