Archive

City staff in Fort Worth are responding to public questions about a proposed data center, with the focus on what the project would mean for the city rather than on the operator itself. The excerpt does not say whether the project is approved, how much power or water it would use, or what tax or land terms are involved.

The story says Homer City Generation's proposed data center water plans are under scrutiny. It points to a local water and cooling issue tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say what water source, usage level, permits, or utility agreements are involved.

Linn County is considering a water study tied to a possible Google data center project, and the company may be asked to help pay for it. The piece is about local water impacts and the public-cost question around a proposed large load in Iowa.

The piece is about a public comment period tied to a proposed data center water supply near Broadview. It centers on water service for a specific project and the local review process, but the excerpt does not say who the developer is, how much water is involved, or whether any agreement has been approved.

The piece is about a proposed state bill that would set rules for data centers in order to shield nearby residents and utility customers. It points to public concerns over how large projects affect water use, utility bills, and local oversight, but the excerpt does not say which project or county is directly involved.

Texas watchdogs say the state environmental agency shut down an online permitting system after criticism that it was still processing data center-related permits during a pause. The piece is about permitting oversight and the state rules around data center water approvals, not a project announcement.

The piece says Gradiant will supply water for a proposed data center in West Texas. It does not say how much water the project will use, where it will be built, or what other local commitments or approvals are involved.

Dixon's City Council unanimously adopted a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center and battery storage applications, even with no project yet filed.

Dixon's council froze data center and battery storage applications for 45 days on September 30, 2026, with no project yet filed and a threshold far below the state's new reporting floor.

Stafford supervisors voted to condemn land for a pipeline tied to reuse water for a data center. The filing says the county is using land condemnation to support water infrastructure for the project, but it does not say who will pay for the pipe, how much water the data center will use, or whether the site has other approvals in hand.

Michigan regulators are taking public comments on a wastewater permit tied to onsite water treatment for a proposed data center in Saline Township. The filing points to wastewater handling and permitting, but it does not say how much water the project will use, how the site will be powered, or what tax or land deal may be attached.

Texas counties are moving to tighten groundwater rules as data center growth adds pressure to local water supplies. The piece is about local regulation, water demand, and the siting consequences for projects that rely on groundwater access.

Four Georgia families have filed suit alleging that construction of a Meta data center polluted their well water. The filing raises water, environmental, and legal questions about what the project may have done to nearby private wells, but the excerpt does not say whether the data center is operating or what specific contamination was found.

The piece is about a proposed data center project in Yukon, Oklahoma, and a reported change in its water plan. It centers on what the developer does or does not plan to use for cooling, which affects local water demand and utility planning.

Amazon is funding a study of a small modular reactor plant intended to support data centers in Indiana. The filing says this is a proposed energy supply study, but it does not say the project is approved, built, or tied to a specific site commitment on land, water, taxes, or transmission costs.

Residents in Walls are objecting to a proposed data center at a public listening session. The excerpt points to local community pushback and a siting dispute; it does not say whether the project has approvals, what power or water commitments it would make, or what the developer offered.

The story says protests are continuing over a proposed Utah data center because of concern about water use tied to the Great Salt Lake. It is about a project’s local water burden and the community response, not about the operator’s business or the broader cloud market.

Residents in San Antonio are pushing for stricter rules on data centers because of concerns about water use, power demand, and noise. The piece is about local opposition and possible regulation of future projects, not a specific approved build.

The project is described as a proposed data center buildout in Pittsylvania County with 21 buildings and very large stated power and water needs. The filing or excerpt does not say what tax abatements, land terms, utility agreements, or other community concessions are attached, if any.

Texas had said it would pause permits tied to data centers, but the state is still moving those approvals forward. The piece is about how a proposed policy shift affects where data center projects can be permitted and what the state is doing instead.

5C is moving ahead with a large expansion of its Memphis data center project. The filing points to a proposed AI-focused facility and signals continued buildout in Memphis, but it does not say in this excerpt what new power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the expansion.

The filing points to a possible data center project in Warrick County, but the excerpt does not say which company is behind it or what commitments it would bring on land, power, water, taxes, or jobs. It is only a notice of a proposed site under a project name, so the community impact is still unspecified.