Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 3 of 5.
Oregon has paused most new permits for data centers until July, which puts a temporary brake on siting decisions in the state. The piece also says Amazon is warning that large sums of planned investment could be at risk, but it does not say which projects are covered or what specific permit rules are changing.
Oregon has paused permits for data center projects while state and local officials continue debating how much power and water those facilities would use and what they would contribute economically. The filing does not say which specific projects are affected or what final policy will look like in 2027.
Grant County officials say they found data center changes that were not reported as required, and those changes appear to have affected the tax picture. The piece is about county oversight of a local AI data center and the money tied to its assessment and incentives, not a project expansion announcement from the developer.
San Jose is weighing draft standards for data center development, and the reporting says those standards are not strong enough. The piece is about local zoning and regulation around where data centers can be built, and what the city is or is not requiring of future projects.
Weld County residents are organizing against a proposed data center build and using a petition drive to push for a stop to development. The filing as described covers community opposition and local siting pressure, not project benefits or financing.
The piece appears to describe ongoing construction at Project Jupiter, a proposed hyperscale data center in Albuquerque. The excerpt does not say what power source, water supply, tax deal, or land arrangement the project commits to, so those details remain unstated here.
Montana drought is prompting scrutiny of how data centers use water and whether those projects should face a formal review. The piece points to a state-level water issue tied to a proposed or existing data center footprint, but the excerpt does not say which project, what amount of water is involved, or what review process is being considered.
The piece is about local zoning changes and moratoriums affecting proposed U.S. BESS and data center projects. It concerns siting and regulation, with community opposition in the background, but the headline does not specify a particular project, host, or financial commitment.
The piece is about a proposed data center campus in Las Cruces that is opening for a tour while it faces regulatory hurdles. It points to local scrutiny over the project rather than any firm commitment on water, power, land, or tax terms.
The piece is about calls to examine data center power demand and to review tax breaks tied to these projects. It concerns how proposed facilities may affect utility planning and local incentives, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project, place, or policy outcome.
Spokane residents rallied against proposed AI data centers over concerns about water use and power demand. The piece is about local opposition to a data center buildout and the community questions around resource strain, not a corporate product or earnings story.
The piece says proposed AI data centers on federal land have become a campaign issue in Nevada’s governor’s race. It points to land use and political conflict, but the excerpt does not say which sites are involved, what power or water commitments are tied to them, or whether any approvals have been made.
Residents in Downeast Maine are objecting to a proposed underwater AI data center. The filing, as described here, points to a local siting fight and community opposition, but does not spell out the project’s power source, water use, tax terms, or land deal.
This piece is about Nevada unions backing data centers and trying to build broader support around them. The excerpt points to a debate over tax abatements and incentives, so the public question is what the projects would commit the state or local communities to in return for those benefits.
Grant County is talking about higher assessed values for data center property as AI-related computing grows. The piece points to tax revenue and valuation, not to a new site approval or utility deal.
The piece is about a Hudspeth County data center acknowledging poor community notice and trying to clarify what the project involves. It points to a local siting and transparency dispute rather than a financing or technical story.
The piece appears to focus on a data center project changing the local economy in Quincy, Washington, with the hook centered on tax abatements and incentives. It points to community-level effects and public subsidy questions, but the excerpt does not say which specific project commitments, local approvals, or clawbacks are involved.
The piece says a proposed data center in Silicon Valley is drawing concern over its power use and environmental effects. It points to a project that would affect the local host community through electricity demand and related impacts, but the excerpt does not say what land use approvals, water sourcing, tax terms, or utility commitments are in place.
A Los Angeles-based firm has started construction on a proposed data center in Hudspeth County. The excerpt points to a project centered on local tax incentives, but it does not say what the site will use for power or water, what land or zoning approvals were needed, or what ongoing public costs or concessions were included.
California has moved to shift some data center-related costs onto developers and owners rather than leaving them with the host community. The piece appears to focus on how the new rules affect project bills and who pays, not on a specific site or operator.
Oracle's force majeure notice on Project Jupiter sits atop a stalled air permit, a blocked pipeline route, and a grid queue already 87% data centers — and three New Mexico counties have already rewritten their rules in r
Oracle's force majeure notice on Project Jupiter sits atop a stalled air permit, a blocked pipeline route, and a grid queue already 87% data centers — and three New Mexico counties have already rewritten their rules in r
The piece appears to focus on how new California data center laws could affect the planned Rucci project. It points to a regulatory and project-level change, but the excerpt does not say what specific commitments the project makes on land, power, water, or tax terms.
Amazon’s proposed Walla Walla data center has become a local siting dispute, with protesters and officials in tension over the project. The excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the plan.
California has adopted a new regulatory framework aimed at data centers, which puts the project type into a clearer state policy lane. The excerpt does not say whether this changes siting, power access, water use, taxes, or any specific project already underway.


