Archive

A super PAC is intervening in local Kansas politics around measures aimed at blocking data centers. The piece centers on community opposition and the political response, not on a specific project commitment or incentive package.

Janesville voters are being asked to weigh in on what happens to a vacant former GM plant. The story is about local land-use and community control over a large industrial site, not a power, water, or tax commitment that has already been made.

The piece is about opposition and debate over a proposed data center complex in Newport Township. The filing excerpt does not say whether the project needs land approvals, zoning changes, power, water, tax incentives, or other host-community commitments.

Loudoun County is updating its data center rules to match changes in state code. The piece is about local regulation affecting where and how data centers can be developed in the county, not about a specific project filing or utility commitment.

New Jersey towns are using local bans to stop data centers from being built in their communities. The piece is about siting and local land-use opposition, with the impact falling on residents in the affected towns.

The mayor is starting a 90-day review to write rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and what the city may require before more projects move forward.

The piece says this New Jersey industrial city is not taking an AI data center. That points to local opposition and a siting decision, with the community and zoning side of the project being the main issue; the excerpt does not say what proposal, if any, was formally filed or what specific power, water, tax, or land terms were on the table.

Florida data center projects are still attracting investment even as local opposition grows. The story appears to focus on siting and community conflict in southwest Florida, with the public fight centered on whether these projects should move forward.

Connecticut towns are considering bans or moratoriums on data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning backlash, and it does not describe a specific project commitment to power, water, tax, or land.

The piece covers local backlash to proposed data centers in Connecticut and the anxiety driving opposition to them. It fits the community and siting beats, with zoning and regulation likely in play, but the excerpt does not say what specific project terms are on the table.

Google is making concessions while Hermantown officials head toward a vote on a proposed data center. The piece is about local siting and community opposition, and it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are actually on the table.

The item says the county board is sending moratorium resolutions to the Planning Commission. That signals a local land-use pause and shows the county is considering limits on future development, but the excerpt does not say what kind of projects the moratorium would affect or what rules would change.

A judge ordered Talbot County to remove a data center text amendment from its zoning code. The piece is about local zoning control over where data centers can be approved in the county, not about power, water, or project financing.

A South Shore town has put a hold on data center development, which puts local siting and zoning decisions at the center of the story. The piece appears to focus on what the pause means for future approvals and for residents weighing the project locally.

Wausau’s council is taking a second look at its data center rules, which points to a local land-use and regulatory decision rather than a project announcement. The excerpt does not say which specific rules are changing or whether any developer, site, power, water, or tax commitment is attached.

Irondale’s mayor is saying the city will not impose a ban on data centers and will instead look at regulations. The piece is about local siting rules and how the city plans to control future projects, but it does not say what specific requirements are being considered.

The piece is about how Memphis City Council members voted on proposed data center projects. It centers on local land-use and permitting decisions, with the political response around those proposals also in view.

The council advanced the Piedmont data center plan but put off the final vote after residents pushed back. The filing points to a local siting fight with community opposition; it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project would make.

Tippecanoe planners approved restrictions on large-scale data centers, which puts zoning limits around where and how a project could be built in the county. The filing does not say whether any specific site is proposed, what power or water would be committed, or whether any tax deal is attached.

Suffolk has kept a local ban on data centers in place, but the headline says that restriction is temporary rather than permanent. The piece is about local zoning and regulation affecting whether data centers can be built in the city.

Microsoft has filed paperwork for a proposed data center campus in Floyd County, Georgia. The filing points to a siting and local-approval story; the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments are included, or whether any were already secured.

The piece says the Leola data center’s conditional use permit request has been tabled again. That points to an unresolved siting and zoning step, but the excerpt does not say what the applicant asked for beyond the permit or why the delay happened.