Archive

Trenton is considering a local rule that would link tax relief and YMCA discount perks to how a data center vote turns out. The filing points to a project-facing tax and community benefit issue, but it does not say what the data center would use for power, water, or land.

Alabama has a new data center law in force, and the piece frames it through the effect on electricity bills rather than on any specific project site. The filing as given does not identify a particular developer or host community, and it does not say what the law changes in detail beyond its expected impact on power costs.

Pennsylvania legislators are considering limits on how data center projects use nondisclosure agreements and whether they can claim public utility status. The piece is about state-level rules that would shape how projects are negotiated and what obligations or protections they can claim.

The piece says a second hyperscale data center in De Soto is moving ahead while residents push a petition to block development. It centers on siting and local opposition, with the community deciding what the host place will accept.

The piece is about state lawmakers and Democrats moving to block or slow data center legislation. It is a policy and legislative fight, not a project-specific announcement, and the excerpt does not say which bill, site, utility, tax deal, or community would be affected.

A local group is using a lawsuit to try to pry loose city records about a Tesla data center in Austin. The piece is about transparency around a proposed infrastructure project and the public information the city has not released.

Oregon's POWER Act has produced real rate surcharges and a governor now backing a full moratorium, with three key dates set to shape data center development next.

The piece is about a Wisconsin Rapids politician facing fallout over an email tied to anti-data center signs. It concerns local opposition politics around a proposed data center, not the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

The piece appears to be about a proposed data center project in Amber, Oklahoma, and the claim that it is unlikely to be stopped. The excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, taxes, or land, or what objections, approvals, or legal steps are driving that conclusion.

A South Carolina law firm is asking regulators to revisit a decision tied to a proposed Spartanburg data center. The piece is about the legal and regulatory fight around siting a project in the state, and it does not say the project has been approved, built, or that the filing changed any project terms.

A developer is asking a judge to overturn Pahrump's ban on a data center, and the dispute centers on water. The filing does not say the ban is already gone; it says the developer is trying to get it tossed in court.

The piece says a Cincinnati member of Congress wants to bar local officials from signing nondisclosure agreements tied to data center deals. That points to the secrecy around siting and incentives, but the excerpt does not say which project is affected or whether any agreement has already been signed.

Residents are suing over noise tied to a proposed Southaven data center, which puts the local project’s community impacts and legal fight in view. The excerpt does not say what the filing seeks beyond the noise complaint or what project commitments, if any, were made on power, water, tax, or land.

The piece is about a local ballot fight over Butte’s proposed data center initiative and the state court action that put it back before voters. It concerns community opposition and the legal process around whether the initiative stays on the ballot.

Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.

Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.

The piece is about a defamation dispute tied to opposition to a proposed large data center in Utah. It centers on the public fight around the project, not on the facility’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

A court or other decision has been made on an effort to halt work at a proposed data center site in Cumberland County. The filing and headline indicate a local fight over whether construction can continue, but they do not say what the ruling changed on water, power, tax, or land terms.

The piece says a Midtown data center site is facing a tax sale tied to unpaid obligations. It points to a money and taxation issue for the property and the local public body involved, but the excerpt does not say whether the site is operating, who owns it, or whether the project will continue.

New Jersey fined DataOne over pollution and permit violations tied to a Vineland data center. The filing points to environmental and regulatory problems at a specific site, but does not say how the violations affect the project's power, water, land, or tax terms beyond the enforcement action.

New Jersey’s administration has fined a Vineland data center, which points to a regulatory or enforcement issue tied to the site rather than a buildout update. The filing does not say what triggered the fine, whether the amount will be contested, or what the project’s broader water, power, land, or tax obligations are.

The piece is about Project Jupiter in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, and the fight over its data center footprint, with water and air scrutiny still in play after a state court setback. It says the legal loss did not end the broader local battle over whether and how the project can move ahead.