Archive

Hilliard reports that Amazon’s proposed data-center projects received property-tax breaks while also exceeding job targets. The filing, as described here, says something about local tax relief and hiring performance, but it does not say what land, power, water, or utility commitments came with the projects.

Oklahoma City approved a first large data center project and attached zoning conditions to it. The piece appears to focus on siting and local land-use terms, with water and cooling also implicated by the source label.

Local officials approved a moratorium tied to a proposed data center, which keeps the project from moving forward for now. The piece says concerns about the project's impact remain, but it does not spell out any power, water, tax, or land commitment from the developer.

Committee reports in Alliance appear to weigh whether the city can support a data center, with the focus on local benefits and needed infrastructure or public costs. The filing does not say the project is approved, and it does not spell out a final tax deal or land commitment in the excerpt provided.

A super PAC is intervening in local Kansas politics around measures aimed at blocking data centers. The piece centers on community opposition and the political response, not on a specific project commitment or incentive package.

Residents in Upper Hanover Township are responding to the withdrawal of a proposed data center plan, and local officials are questioning the developer’s motives. The filing does not say what land, power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would have required, only that the proposal was pulled back.

Janesville voters are being asked to weigh in on what happens to a vacant former GM plant. The story is about local land-use and community control over a large industrial site, not a power, water, or tax commitment that has already been made.

The piece is about opposition and debate over a proposed data center complex in Newport Township. The filing excerpt does not say whether the project needs land approvals, zoning changes, power, water, tax incentives, or other host-community commitments.

The story is about cargo theft on highways that affects shipments headed to data centers, not a data center project itself. It touches the supply chain around buildouts, but it does not say anything about a specific site, power, water, tax, land, or approvals.

The piece ties a local recall election to a fight over a proposed data center in Piqua. It concerns community opposition and the local approval fight, not the operator’s finances or any technical buildout details.

The piece is about proposed US data centre and battery storage deals involving Vantage and Microsoft, with Heron Power and NiSource tied to the power side of those projects. The excerpt does not say what specific sites are involved, what land or water commitments exist, or whether any tax deal has been approved.

The piece says this New Jersey industrial city is not taking an AI data center. That points to local opposition and a siting decision, with the community and zoning side of the project being the main issue; the excerpt does not say what proposal, if any, was formally filed or what specific power, water, tax, or land terms were on the table.

Microsoft bought land in Licking County, which is a siting move for a data center project in central Ohio. The excerpt does not say what the parcel will be used for, whether utilities are committed, or whether any approvals or incentives are in place.

Amazon is presenting water-usage and dewatering details to a county advisory board, so the filing is about local water impacts tied to a proposed data center project. The excerpt also says Microsoft postponed, but it does not explain whether that change affects the same site or a separate project.

The piece says ComEd customers in Illinois could be left paying for the grid work needed to connect data centers. It centers on who bears the cost of large-load hookups, not on the data centers themselves.

Google is making concessions while Hermantown officials head toward a vote on a proposed data center. The piece is about local siting and community opposition, and it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are actually on the table.

The story says Homer City Generation's proposed data center water plans are under scrutiny. It points to a local water and cooling issue tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say what water source, usage level, permits, or utility agreements are involved.

Linn County is considering a water study tied to a possible Google data center project, and the company may be asked to help pay for it. The piece is about local water impacts and the public-cost question around a proposed large load in Iowa.

The story is about a proposed Trenton data center and the tax revenue the local school district says it would generate. It is a local money-and-taxation piece tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the deal includes abatements, land terms, power, or water commitments.

A court denied a temporary restraining order in a Springfield lawsuit tied to the proposed data center moratorium. The filing appears to concern legal control over whether the project can move forward, but the excerpt does not say anything about power, water, tax terms, or land commitments by the developer.

Wausau’s council is taking a second look at its data center rules, which points to a local land-use and regulatory decision rather than a project announcement. The excerpt does not say which specific rules are changing or whether any developer, site, power, water, or tax commitment is attached.

The council advanced the Piedmont data center plan but put off the final vote after residents pushed back. The filing points to a local siting fight with community opposition; it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project would make.