Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 4 of 16.
Local officials and residents in southeast Georgia are facing a wave of proposed data center development and the land-use and community questions that come with it. The excerpt does not say which projects are involved, what power or water supply they would need, or whether any approvals have been filed or granted.
West Virginia lawmakers have taken county governments out of the decision-making process for data center projects, while residents are still protesting a rumored proposal. The filing points to a siting and local-governance fight, but it does not identify a specific project, operator, or any power, water, tax, or land terms tied to the rumored site.
Palo and Grimes are working on rules for data centers, so this is a local regulation story tied to siting and community controls. The excerpt does not say what the rules would require, whether they touch power, water, taxes, or land, or whether any project is already proposed.
DCIP Group’s proposed Florida data center campus is running into rezoning trouble. The filing points to a siting fight over whether the project can clear local land-use approval, but it does not say the campus has been approved or built.
A proposed data center complex in Dauphin County could take the place of an earlier warehouse plan. The filing, as presented here, does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments the project makes.
The piece is about Ohio opposition to data-center development and how that backlash is affecting election politics. It points to community resistance and siting fights rather than any specific project cost, utility deal, or tax package.
Falls Township is preparing zoning changes to set rules for future data center development. The filing points to local land-use regulation, but it does not say that a specific project has been approved or what any proposed site would commit in power, water, tax, or land terms.
A Bitcoin mining project has been proposed for Jersey County, Illinois. The filing as given does not say whether it would use utility power, private generation, water for cooling, or what local approvals, tax terms, or land controls would apply.
San Diego city officials delayed a proposed data center after residents spoke against it at City Council. The excerpt points to a local siting and community fight, but it does not say what commitments the project made on land, power, water, taxes, or approvals beyond the delay.
Delhi Township is cutting off its relationship with LEAP after a proposed $10 billion data center plan. The filing points to local opposition and a siting fight, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, or spell out the land, power, water, or tax terms.
Oklahoma City has approved zoning for a large data center project, which is a land-use step rather than a final commitment to build. The excerpt does not say whether the project has secured power, water, financing, or other permits, so those pieces remain unspecified.
The filing says a lawsuit is challenging approvals tied to changes for a large Pennsylvania data center project and a natural-gas power plant. It points to a legal fight over siting and power approvals, but the excerpt does not say what the changes were or how the project would affect land, water, taxes, or local utilities.
The piece appears to cover a state data center map, the number of facilities in the state, and criticism from opponents. Based on the headline and excerpt, it points to siting and community reaction, with a possible policy or transparency angle, but it does not say what specific project commitments or filings are involved.
The story is about Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker pressing for statewide data center rules while talks in Springfield have not produced a deal. It concerns regulation and the state-level siting and policy environment for data centers, not a specific project commitment.
The piece is about land sales tied to Meta’s proposed data center site and the role of a state senator in handling those transactions. It points to the siting and money side of a specific project in Alabama, while the excerpt does not say whether the deal included tax terms, zoning changes, or other approvals.
The piece is about a proposed state bill aimed at protecting the Mahomet Aquifer from data center development, and the village’s support for those protections. It concerns water use and local siting rules, with the project details still at the proposal and legislative stage.
Gregg Township approved a conditional use tied to a proposed data center. The filing does not say what land, power, water, or tax terms are attached, so this is only a land-use approval, not a full account of the project’s resource or fiscal footprint.
The piece is about a proposed data center campus in Eatonton, Georgia and says the developer is aiming for a future opening. The excerpt does not say what land has been secured, how power will be supplied, whether water use has been committed, or what taxes or incentives are attached.
TerraWatt presented its Riverbend data center proposal at an open house in Alton. The excerpt does not say what the project commits the host to on power, water, tax terms, or land use, or what questions were raised at the event.
Walker County’s study committee has finished reviewing proposed restrictions on data centers. The piece is about local siting and regulation, and it appears to concern how the county may limit or condition future projects.
The piece is about a proposed large data center project near Lansing and the pushback around it. It points to community opposition and the local siting fight, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, land, or approval terms the project actually commits to.
Oklahoma City approved a first large data center project and attached zoning conditions to it. The piece appears to focus on siting and local land-use terms, with water and cooling also implicated by the source label.
Local officials approved a moratorium tied to a proposed data center, which keeps the project from moving forward for now. The piece says concerns about the project's impact remain, but it does not spell out any power, water, tax, or land commitment from the developer.
Residents in Upper Hanover Township are responding to the withdrawal of a proposed data center plan, and local officials are questioning the developer’s motives. The filing does not say what land, power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would have required, only that the proposal was pulled back.
Janesville voters are being asked to weigh in on what happens to a vacant former GM plant. The story is about local land-use and community control over a large industrial site, not a power, water, or tax commitment that has already been made.