Archive

Virginia’s new tax on data center electricity use is taking effect gradually, which makes this a state tax policy story tied to the operating cost of hosting data centers. The piece appears to focus on how the tax applies and how quickly it phases in, not on a specific project buildout or site commitment.

Residents in Walls are objecting to a proposed data center at a public listening session. The excerpt points to local community pushback and a siting dispute; it does not say whether the project has approvals, what power or water commitments it would make, or what the developer offered.

Lowndes County approved a 20-year data center tax abatement, and the piece centers on calls for clearer public disclosure and more local control over that decision. It points to the money side of the project and the local process around it, not to the site’s power or water buildout.

The piece appears to compare Spartanburg leaders with Virginia’s data center experience, with the source label pointing to tax abatements and incentives. On the face of the headline and excerpt, it is about what a local market might learn about hosting data centers, not about a specific approved project or a new build.

The project is described as a proposed data center buildout in Pittsylvania County with 21 buildings and very large stated power and water needs. The filing or excerpt does not say what tax abatements, land terms, utility agreements, or other community concessions are attached, if any.

5C is moving ahead with a large expansion of its Memphis data center project. The filing points to a proposed AI-focused facility and signals continued buildout in Memphis, but it does not say in this excerpt what new power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the expansion.

Residents in Coweta County are organizing a petition to force a vote on a ban tied to data centers. The piece is about local opposition and land-use control, not a project approval or power deal.

Chester County residents are organizing to push back on, or reshape, proposed housing and data center development. The piece is about local opposition and the land-use fight around where these projects would go and what that means for the community.

The piece is about a dispute over public records tied to a proposed data center and a utility’s lawsuit against the person who shared them, along with two newspapers. It points to how project information, public access, and legal pressure can shape local oversight of data center development.

Loudoun County says its board approved a process that could pause applications for data centers and substations under legislative review. The piece is about local siting and zoning control over proposed projects, not a specific build outcome.

Goochland County Court is set to consider how data center land use should be handled locally. The filing points to a land-use dispute, but it does not say whether the county will approve, reject, or change any specific project.

Georgia's 100-megawatt regulatory threshold, not the state's tax abatement fight, now determines whether ratepayers are shielded from a data center's power costs.

Georgia's 100-megawatt regulatory threshold, not the state's tax abatement fight, now determines whether ratepayers are shielded from a data center's power costs.

A Florida judge has blocked a hearing on an appeal tied to the proposed data center in Indiantown. The filing points to a legal fight over whether the project can move forward, but it does not say what the project itself would commit in land, power, water, or tax terms.

Cobb County is considering rules for data centers, with utility experts raising cost and water concerns tied to how these facilities would use local infrastructure. The piece is about local siting and regulation, and what the county may require from future projects.

Broward officials are set to discuss a temporary ban on new large-scale data centers. The filing does not say what the proposal would cover in detail, whether existing projects are affected, or what limits on power, water, land use, or permits are being considered.

The item says Cloverleaf has released agreement details for Project Red Clay. On the face of it, that points to a project-level incentive or tax arrangement, but the excerpt does not say what the site will host, what public commitments are in the deal, or whether the project still needs approvals.

Applied Digital is reported to have agreed to a community benefit deal tied to its Boyce project. The filing excerpt does not say what the project will consume or receive on power, water, tax treatment, or land beyond that agreement, and it does not spell out the full terms of the deal.

A local data center study group in Walker County is discussing likely community impacts tied to a proposed project, including lighting, noise, and water use. The piece points to early public review rather than a built facility, and it does not say what final commitments, if any, the project will make on power, water, tax, or land.

The filing appears to focus on local siting and community impacts around a proposed data center in Dauphin County. The headline points to road work and noise monitoring, which suggests the project would place some infrastructure burden on the host area, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land deal terms were actually committed.

The county has moved ahead with a deal for a proposed Meta data center on a large tract of land. The filing points to siting and tax treatment, but it does not say what power supply, water use, or other utility commitments come with the project.

A lawsuit over Project Tango says Palm Beach County unfairly rejected the proposed data center and that a county commissioner should have stepped aside because of a conflict claim. The filing concerns the county’s land-use decision and the legal process around it, but it does not say the project has been approved or built.