Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 4 of 8.
Oregon has paused permits for data center projects while state and local officials continue debating how much power and water those facilities would use and what they would contribute economically. The filing does not say which specific projects are affected or what final policy will look like in 2027.
Construction has started on the Beacon Point data center near Robstown and Calallen in the Corpus Christi area. The headline signals a new project in Texas, but it does not say what the filing commits the site to in power, water, tax treatment, or land use beyond the start of construction.
The piece centers on debate in Trenton over proposed data centers and the local response around water and cooling concerns. It also points to local legislative conflict, but the excerpt does not say a project was approved, built, or formally changed.
Texas attorney general sent letters to more than 150 proposed data center developments, including one in Nacogdoches County. The filing, as described here, does not say what commitments any project has made on land, power, water, taxes, or local approvals.
The piece appears to describe ongoing construction at Project Jupiter, a proposed hyperscale data center in Albuquerque. The excerpt does not say what power source, water supply, tax deal, or land arrangement the project commits to, so those details remain unstated here.
Burrillville is moving ahead with a water infrastructure choice while stopping short of a local data center ban. The piece is about a local siting and community decision in Rhode Island, not a proposed project filing with technical details, so it says more about town policy than about a specific host commitment to power, water, tax, or land.
Environmental advocates are raising concerns about the project’s water use and the tax incentives attached to it. The excerpt does not say whether the project has secured approvals, what the facility is, or how much water or money is involved.
Cobb County is considering rules for data centers, with utility experts raising cost and water concerns tied to how these facilities would use local infrastructure. The piece is about local siting and regulation, and what the county may require from future projects.
The story is about Texas data centers facing scrutiny over water use, with Harris County named as one of the places affected. It points to a legal and regulatory push by the state attorney general, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved, what remedies are being sought, or whether any filing has been made.
Montana drought is prompting scrutiny of how data centers use water and whether those projects should face a formal review. The piece points to a state-level water issue tied to a proposed or existing data center footprint, but the excerpt does not say which project, what amount of water is involved, or what review process is being considered.
The piece is about a proposed data center campus in Las Cruces that is opening for a tour while it faces regulatory hurdles. It points to local scrutiny over the project rather than any firm commitment on water, power, land, or tax terms.
A local data center study group in Walker County is discussing likely community impacts tied to a proposed project, including lighting, noise, and water use. The piece points to early public review rather than a built facility, and it does not say what final commitments, if any, the project will make on power, water, tax, or land.
Texas is trying to use state enforcement tools against data center water use, and the headline says the case shows where current law runs out. The piece appears to focus on how much leverage Texas has over a project’s water and cooling demands, and what regulators can and cannot force operators to do.
Meta is named as a partner in a proposed 2,000-acre data center project in Maysville, Kentucky, and the piece frames it as controversial. The excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms the project includes, or what commitments Meta has actually made.
The piece is about a proposed data center project in Cass County and the developer's pitch on local economic benefits and environmental safeguards. It appears to concern siting and local approval issues, with a water and environmental angle, but it does not say the project has been approved or built.
Hood County turned down a proposed settlement tied to the Comanche Circle data center and also rejected the permit appeal. The piece is about local land-use and legal conflict over whether the project can move ahead in Hood County, Texas, and it does not say what new water, power, tax, or land terms, if any, were on the table beyond the dispute itself.
Spokane residents rallied against proposed AI data centers over concerns about water use and power demand. The piece is about local opposition to a data center buildout and the community questions around resource strain, not a corporate product or earnings story.
The piece appears to explain how data centers use water and correct common assumptions about where that water comes from or how it is used. It fits the water beat and points to Georgia as the local frame, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project or site.
The piece covers local resistance in Ohio to proposed data centers, with the focus on water use and cooling impacts and on community pushback through moratoriums and other local actions. It points to what the projects would ask of host places, but the excerpt does not spell out specific sites, utilities, or incentive terms.
Mayes County approved Lambda's data center with no tax abatement, while a utility executive's unpublished power study and an unverified $500 million tax estimate remain unconfirmed.
Mayes County approved Lambda's data center with no tax abatement, while a utility executive's unpublished power study and an unverified $500 million tax estimate remain unconfirmed.
TeraWulf says it has expanded the power commitment tied to its Kentucky data center plans to 1 GW. The filing or headline does not say what additional land, water, tax, or utility terms changed, or whether the commitment is final or still subject to approvals.
Pennsylvania has put out a public tracker for data center permits while residents and advocates press environmental concerns. The piece is about state-level transparency around siting and the local pushback tied to water and environmental impacts.
The piece appears to cover how five Indiana data centers structured their projects to avoid federal water permitting, which puts the focus on water regulation and the local siting consequences for the host communities. It does not say in the excerpt which permits were avoided, what facilities were involved, or what conditions were attached to the projects.
A community meeting is planned for Project Pegasus, a proposed data center project. The filing only shows a public discussion about the project; it does not say what land, power, water, tax, or approval commitments the site has secured.