Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 4 of 8.
Memphis council members approved a pause on new data center projects, and the headline says they did so without fully understanding the measure they were voting on. The piece centers on local zoning and transparency in a Southeast city, with the pause affecting where new projects can move forward.
A developer withdrew a proposed data center plan in the Philadelphia suburbs after public opposition. The filing signals a siting fight that ended before approval, and it does not say the project will move forward elsewhere or give details on power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The piece is about Geronimo Power contesting a proposed moratorium before a vote in Harmony Township. It is a local siting and zoning fight, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on land, power, water, or taxes, only that the developer is pushing back.
Savannah and Chatham County are set to consider a data center ordinance alongside updates to the 2040 comprehensive plan. The excerpt does not say what the ordinance would change, whether any project is named, or what commitments on land, power, water, or tax relief are on the table.
Loudoun County ended plans for a proposed Amazon data center after community opposition. The filing, as described here, does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments were tied to the project or what specific concessions were under discussion.
The piece is about Memphis residents pushing back against a proposed data center buildout and the pollution concerns tied to it. It focuses on local opposition and the city’s debate over whether to pause or limit that development.
Parkland’s local government is lining up against a proposed data center sited across from a high school. The filing points to community opposition and a zoning or siting dispute, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, and it does not mention any power, water, tax, or land commitment terms.
Louisville council is taking another look at proposed rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and how the city may shape future data center siting and operations.
Ormond Beach has turned a data center ban into formal local policy. The piece concerns land use rules and local regulation, not a project buildout or utility commitment.
Taunton has adopted a one-year ban on data centers, and the story centers on the public pushback that led to it. The excerpt also raises the question of whether an exception could still be made for a project tied to an industrial park, but it does not say any exception has been approved.
Milwaukee has moved to pause data center projects, joining other Wisconsin cities that have put temporary holds on this kind of development. The filing says nothing about a specific site, power deal, water use, tax package, or developer proposal.
The piece is about a Little Rock ordinance that would have paused data center projects and failed again, so the immediate issue is local opposition and city-level regulation, not a specific build. It does not say which project or projects are affected, nor does it identify any power, water, tax, or land commitment tied to a particular site.
Boone gave site-plan approval for two proposed data center buildings. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms are attached, and it does not describe any community objections or other approvals beyond the site plan.
The proposed Wayne County data center was withdrawn after residents turned out at City Hall. The filing does not say whether the project had specific power, water, tax, or land commitments beyond the planned site and cost.
Texas had said it would pause permits tied to data centers, but the state is still moving those approvals forward. The piece is about how a proposed policy shift affects where data center projects can be permitted and what the state is doing instead.
Archbald council is scheduled to vote on a proposed data center campus, which puts the project’s local siting and approval process in focus. The excerpt does not say what commitments, if any, the developer has made on power, water, tax treatment, or land use terms beyond the vote itself.
A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.
A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.
Residents in Coweta County are organizing a petition to force a vote on a ban tied to data centers. The piece is about local opposition and land-use control, not a project approval or power deal.
A data center is proposed for a site off Michigan Avenue in Inkster. The filing excerpt does not say how the project would use power or water, what land controls or approvals it needs, or what the developer is asking the city to commit.
The piece is about a local fight over a data center ordinance in Bridgewater and Raritan, where the mayor is responding to a lawsuit and the developer is trying to overturn the rule. It points to zoning and legal conflict around whether the project can proceed, but it does not say the filing adds any new commitments on power, water, tax, or land.
New Jersey towns are using local bans to block data center development, and the piece tracks how that opposition is spreading across the state. It is about siting and community pushback, with a clear local land-use and zoning angle; it does not say anything about a specific project’s power draw, water use, tax terms, or a permit decision for one named site.
Florida candidates and county officials are dealing with local opposition to data centers. The piece appears to center on siting politics and community resistance rather than a specific project commitment on power, water, or tax terms.
Chester County residents are organizing to push back on, or reshape, proposed housing and data center development. The piece is about local opposition and the land-use fight around where these projects would go and what that means for the community.
Loudoun County says its board approved a process that could pause applications for data centers and substations under legislative review. The piece is about local siting and zoning control over proposed projects, not a specific build outcome.