Archive

Alliant Energy is describing a future power-supply deal pipeline for data centers in Wisconsin. The filing or excerpt does not say which projects are involved, how much land or water they would need, whether any approvals are pending, or what costs would land on customers or local governments.

Larimer County is asking residents for input as it writes rules for data centers. The excerpt does not say what the proposed rules would require on land use, power, water, taxes, or approvals, beyond the public comment process itself.

Hagerstown officials want more time to consider a proposed annexation tied to a potential data center site. The piece is about local siting and zoning decisions, with the community weighing what the project would mean for the area.

TerraVolt is planning a 240 MW data center campus in Idaho and says it would be behind the meter. The excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments come with the project.

The piece appears to concern backlash to a proposed AI data center and the gap between its clean-energy claims and the community or environmental costs tied to power and water use. It does not give a specific host site, utility deal, or approval outcome in the excerpt provided.

State regulators are pushing back on a MISO proposal that would spread large-load costs more broadly, which puts the dispute in the rates and regulation lane. The piece is about how cost allocation for large power users would land on utilities and customers in the Midwest region; it does not describe a specific data center site or a local project approval.

The piece is about local opposition to data center development in Iowa and the concerns driving that pushback. Based on the headline and section label, water and cooling are part of the dispute, along with community resistance to siting these projects.

The piece is a county-level guide to where data centers are already located in Tennessee. It points to the siting footprint of the industry rather than a single proposed project, and the excerpt does not say which counties are affected or what each site cost in land, power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about Hagerstown considering annexing 171 acres, with data center use drawing most of the public opposition. It centers on siting and local land-use decisions, with a community reaction angle.

Southaven residents are disputing buyout offers tied to the proposed SpaceXAI project. The piece is about local opposition and the land acquisition side of a specific siting proposal, but it does not say what the developer is committing on power, water, tax, or land terms beyond the buyout dispute.

The piece says a proposed underwater data center in Alaska would rely on more than 300 tidal turbines. It also flags the project’s possible conflict with endangered belugas, but the excerpt does not say who is backing it, whether it has permits, or what it would cost in power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about a proposed AI campus on 747 acres with nine buildings and a very large electricity demand, which puts siting and power use at the center of the project. The excerpt does not say whether the project has utility approvals, water agreements, tax incentives, or zoning outcomes.

Olyphant is weighing a proposed settlement in a data center lawsuit, with the dispute centered on how the project is handled locally and what the deal would resolve. The filing does not say what the underlying project commitments were beyond the litigation amount, or how any settlement would affect power, water, land use, or taxes.

The story is about a Mississippi resident fighting the effects of noise from a data centre site linked to SpaceX and refusing to sell his home. It concerns a local community conflict around an existing or proposed project, with the main issue being noise rather than power, water, or tax terms.

New York officials are reviewing a proposed data center with attention to utility costs, water use, and neighborhood effects. The filing, as described, points to community and resource questions rather than a confirmed build decision, and it does not state any final site approval or cost terms.

The filing describes a proposed data center on Indianapolis’s east side and the community investment package tied to it. It says what the project offers the host community, but the excerpt does not spell out the land, water, or power commitments in detail.

The piece is about Google’s orbital data center effort and the first transmission from a satellite AI server back to Earth. It does not say anything about land, water, taxes, utility power, or community approvals for a specific host site.

The piece is about a company trying to turn satellites into space-based data centers. It is an orbital infrastructure story, but the excerpt does not say anything about land, power, water, taxes, permits, or a specific host community on Earth.

The piece says local opposition is linked to most of the delayed or canceled U.S. data center projects cited by S&P. It points to community resistance as a material siting risk, but the excerpt does not say which projects, places, or project commitments were involved.

The piece is about two data center operators saying they will provide more disclosure about their facilities and operations. It does not describe a new site, a permit, power or water commitment, or a local deal.

Kirksville is setting rules for where data centers can go and how their environmental impacts will be reviewed. The story is about local land-use control and environmental oversight, not a specific project commitment to power, water, tax breaks, or a named site package.

Residents in Hudspeth County say they were not informed early enough about a proposed $15 billion data center plan. The piece is about local siting and community notice around a proposed project in Texas, with water and cooling concerns in the background.