Archive

Committee reports in Alliance appear to weigh whether the city can support a data center, with the focus on local benefits and needed infrastructure or public costs. The filing does not say the project is approved, and it does not spell out a final tax deal or land commitment in the excerpt provided.

A super PAC is intervening in local Kansas politics around measures aimed at blocking data centers. The piece centers on community opposition and the political response, not on a specific project commitment or incentive package.

Residents in Upper Hanover Township are responding to the withdrawal of a proposed data center plan, and local officials are questioning the developer’s motives. The filing does not say what land, power, water, tax, or other commitments the project would have required, only that the proposal was pulled back.

Janesville voters are being asked to weigh in on what happens to a vacant former GM plant. The story is about local land-use and community control over a large industrial site, not a power, water, or tax commitment that has already been made.

Cheyenne and Arapaho tribal citizens voted 261-83 to ban data center construction for three years, turning down a deal Governor Wassana said could have brought $200 million a year.

Cheyenne and Arapaho tribal citizens voted 261-83 to ban data center construction for three years, turning down a deal Governor Wassana said could have brought $200 million a year.

The piece is about opposition and debate over a proposed data center complex in Newport Township. The filing excerpt does not say whether the project needs land approvals, zoning changes, power, water, tax incentives, or other host-community commitments.

Loudoun County is updating its data center rules to match changes in state code. The piece is about local regulation affecting where and how data centers can be developed in the county, not about a specific project filing or utility commitment.

The piece ties a local recall election to a fight over a proposed data center in Piqua. It concerns community opposition and the local approval fight, not the operator’s finances or any technical buildout details.

New Mexico State University students and organizers are pressing for a statewide ban on data centers. The piece is about organized opposition and proposed state-level regulation in New Mexico, not a specific project filing or approval.

New Jersey towns are using local bans to stop data centers from being built in their communities. The piece is about siting and local land-use opposition, with the impact falling on residents in the affected towns.

The mayor is starting a 90-day review to write rules for data centers. The piece is about local regulation and what the city may require before more projects move forward.

The piece says this New Jersey industrial city is not taking an AI data center. That points to local opposition and a siting decision, with the community and zoning side of the project being the main issue; the excerpt does not say what proposal, if any, was formally filed or what specific power, water, tax, or land terms were on the table.

Amazon is presenting water-usage and dewatering details to a county advisory board, so the filing is about local water impacts tied to a proposed data center project. The excerpt also says Microsoft postponed, but it does not explain whether that change affects the same site or a separate project.

The project is still meeting organized local resistance in Spartanburg, with the dispute centered on whether the data center should go forward in that community. The headline does not say what project-level commitments are on the table for land, water, taxes, or power, only that opposition remains heated.

Florida data center projects are still attracting investment even as local opposition grows. The story appears to focus on siting and community conflict in southwest Florida, with the public fight centered on whether these projects should move forward.

Connecticut towns are considering bans or moratoriums on data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning backlash, and it does not describe a specific project commitment to power, water, tax, or land.

The piece covers local backlash to proposed data centers in Connecticut and the anxiety driving opposition to them. It fits the community and siting beats, with zoning and regulation likely in play, but the excerpt does not say what specific project terms are on the table.

The piece is about a rural Nevada data center and the local governments that are still backing it despite local opposition. The filing points to a community fight over whether the project should go forward and what it could mean for water use and local decision-making; it does not, from the excerpt, specify the project's full power, tax, or land terms.

City staff in Fort Worth are responding to public questions about a proposed data center, with the focus on what the project would mean for the city rather than on the operator itself. The excerpt does not say whether the project is approved, how much power or water it would use, or what tax or land terms are involved.

Amazon abandoned a proposed data center project after local opposition from neighbors. The filing and headline point to a siting fight and community pushback, but they do not say the project was approved, built, or tied to any specific power, water, tax, or land commitment beyond the proposed plan.

The piece says Project Saltworks has ended county tax negotiations. It reports a local tax-incentive dispute tied to a proposed project, but the excerpt does not say what the project will build, what tax terms were on the table, or whether the project is still moving forward.