Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 5 of 6.
Pennsylvania regulators issued a water-quality certification tied to the proposed restart of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant for data center power use. The filing points to a water and power decision in Dauphin County, but it does not say what water commitments, cooling changes, or broader project terms were approved.
The piece is about the public fight over data center expansion and the energy costs tied to it. It points to Congress as the place where proposals to protect consumers from rising power bills are being discussed, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project, host site, utility deal, or local approval.
The piece is about Minnesota's data center expansion and the strain it puts on energy supply, water use, and local decision-making. It frames the issue as a dispute over public costs and approvals, not as a project announcement.
The piece appears to examine a bipartisan bill aimed at data centers and what it would do for local ratepayers and project costs. From the headline and excerpt alone, the filing does not specify a project site, a host community, or the exact terms of any land, water, tax, or power commitment.
Apex Clean Energy says it has signed a power purchase agreement with Meta for electricity from a Texas solar project. The filing, as presented here, does not say whether the project is built, its size, its timeline, or what land, water, tax, or grid commitments it carries.
This is about a Colorado data center bill and the pushback it is drawing over how ratepayer protections would work. The excerpt does not say which project or site is affected, or whether the bill changes land, water, taxes, or only utility costs.
The piece argues that promises to shield ordinary customers from the costs of serving AI data centers need enforceable rules. It is about who pays for new grid and tariff burdens tied to data center load, not about a specific site or project.
The piece maps data center sites in Alabama and notes their power and water use. It is a state-level siting, power, and water rundown for a specific host location.
Virginia has passed a new data center law, and this piece examines what the law covers and what it leaves out. It appears to be about the state rules that will shape future siting and utility impacts for data centers in Virginia, not about a single project.
The piece is about Indiana weighing how data center growth would affect its energy system and the local deal-making around hosting those projects. The headline and excerpt point to policy and incentive questions, but they do not say which project is involved or what specific commitments were made.
A French company is proposing a large data center project in Frankfort, Indiana. The headline and excerpt point to a planned AI-oriented facility and a large dollar figure, but they do not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approval commitments are attached.
The piece is about proposed federal legislation on data centers and how their electricity costs are passed through to ratepayers. It matters for utility customers and developers because it would shape who pays for new large-load demand, but the excerpt does not say what the bill actually requires in detail.
The story is about federal legislation aimed at preventing AI data center power costs from being passed through to ordinary consumers. It concerns who pays for the electricity needed to serve large new loads, but the excerpt does not identify a specific project or host site.
The piece is about an Upper Burrell data center plan and the rule that the project must bring its own gas-fired power. That puts the focus on project siting and power, with local opposition and moratorium politics in the background.
A county in southern Virginia rejected a proposed buildout that paired 12 data centers with a large gas plant. The filing says residents organized against it and the county board voted it down; it does not say the project won any land, water, tax, or power approvals.
This is about an orbital data center project, not a terrestrial siting, power, water, or tax dispute. The excerpt says StarDetect is building an orbital constellation and has GPUs in orbit, but it does not say what land, utility, or public-fiscal commitments any host community is taking on.
New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill aimed at setting a large-load tariff for data centers. The filing does not say how the tariff would work in practice, which projects it would cover, or how costs would be assigned.
Duke Energy is proposing separate utility rules for data centers in North Carolina. The piece is about how a utility would structure service terms for a specific class of large load in the state, not about a single project being built.
Duke Energy is said to be considering a large-load tariff that stays light on requirements for big power users. The piece appears to focus on how that pricing approach could affect who pays for the added grid burden in Duke's territory.
North Carolina officials say they will enforce a new federal pledge tied to Duke Energy’s data center load. The filing points to power and tariff rules, not a specific site or construction commitment.
Five US grid operators are asking for more time on FERC’s deadline for handling data center power requests. The filing, as described here, concerns how utilities and grid operators manage large-load interconnection and tariff rules, not a specific project site or commitment.
The piece is about a Duke Energy tariff fight in Florida and how it could affect what data center load pays for under utility rate rules. It centers on power costs and ratepayer protections, not on a specific project buildout.
A data center has broken ground near a former coal plant campus in Beaver County. The filing says the project is happening at a specific site, but it does not say what power deal, water source, tax package, or land-use approval is attached to it.
The House is set to consider a bill that would try to limit how much data center electricity demand is passed through to other customers. The excerpt does not say which projects, utilities, or states would be covered, or what specific cost rule the bill would change.
Montana lawmakers are preparing a bill that would shift some of the cost and risk of data center power demand away from ordinary ratepayers. The filing points to state policy around who pays for large-load electricity service, but it does not say there is a specific project approval or a named site in this excerpt.