Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 5 of 16.
The piece is about opposition and debate over a proposed data center complex in Newport Township. The filing excerpt does not say whether the project needs land approvals, zoning changes, power, water, tax incentives, or other host-community commitments.
The piece says the Berry Hill Megasite is planned for 21 data center buildings over 15 years. It signals a long-build siting project, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are already in place.
The piece ties a local recall election to a fight over a proposed data center in Piqua. It concerns community opposition and the local approval fight, not the operator’s finances or any technical buildout details.
New Mexico State University students and organizers are pressing for a statewide ban on data centers. The piece is about organized opposition and proposed state-level regulation in New Mexico, not a specific project filing or approval.
New Jersey towns are using local bans to stop data centers from being built in their communities. The piece is about siting and local land-use opposition, with the impact falling on residents in the affected towns.
The piece appears to concern another proposed gas-fired plant tied to data center development, alongside a gas pipeline expansion that would support it. It is about siting and power infrastructure in Nevada, and it does not say whether the project has been approved or what specific community costs would fall on local residents.
The piece says this New Jersey industrial city is not taking an AI data center. That points to local opposition and a siting decision, with the community and zoning side of the project being the main issue; the excerpt does not say what proposal, if any, was formally filed or what specific power, water, tax, or land terms were on the table.
Microsoft bought land in Licking County, which is a siting move for a data center project in central Ohio. The excerpt does not say what the parcel will be used for, whether utilities are committed, or whether any approvals or incentives are in place.
OpenAI has applied for a permit tied to filling wetlands for a proposed data center site in the Savannah area. The filing speaks to siting and environmental permitting, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, or what power, water, tax, or land terms would apply.
The piece appears to focus on whether Bitcoin mining and related data center plans in western New York are losing momentum, with opposition and a moratorium shaping what can be built. It is about siting and community resistance in Niagara County, not cloud software or chip design.
The project is still meeting organized local resistance in Spartanburg, with the dispute centered on whether the data center should go forward in that community. The headline does not say what project-level commitments are on the table for land, water, taxes, or power, only that opposition remains heated.
Florida data center projects are still attracting investment even as local opposition grows. The story appears to focus on siting and community conflict in southwest Florida, with the public fight centered on whether these projects should move forward.
Connecticut towns are considering bans or moratoriums on data center development. The piece is about local siting and zoning backlash, and it does not describe a specific project commitment to power, water, tax, or land.
The piece is about how Electra is handling local construction pressure tied to a data center and nearby solar farms. It points to a place-specific siting and infrastructure issue, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on power, water, tax, or land.
The piece covers local backlash to proposed data centers in Connecticut and the anxiety driving opposition to them. It fits the community and siting beats, with zoning and regulation likely in play, but the excerpt does not say what specific project terms are on the table.
The piece is about a rural Nevada data center and the local governments that are still backing it despite local opposition. The filing points to a community fight over whether the project should go forward and what it could mean for water use and local decision-making; it does not, from the excerpt, specify the project's full power, tax, or land terms.
Amazon abandoned a proposed data center project after local opposition from neighbors. The filing and headline point to a siting fight and community pushback, but they do not say the project was approved, built, or tied to any specific power, water, tax, or land commitment beyond the proposed plan.
Google is making concessions while Hermantown officials head toward a vote on a proposed data center. The piece is about local siting and community opposition, and it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments are actually on the table.
A South Shore town has put a hold on data center development, which puts local siting and zoning decisions at the center of the story. The piece appears to focus on what the pause means for future approvals and for residents weighing the project locally.
The piece is about local opposition in Culpeper to data center development and the push for a moratorium. It affects county land-use decisions and the siting of future projects, but the excerpt does not say anything about a specific project committing land, power, water, or tax terms.
Irondale’s mayor is saying the city will not impose a ban on data centers and will instead look at regulations. The piece is about local siting rules and how the city plans to control future projects, but it does not say what specific requirements are being considered.
Residents in Alliance, Ohio are opposing a proposed data center and pushing back on the rules around it. The piece is about local community resistance and the siting and regulation questions around a specific project.
The piece is about how Memphis City Council members voted on proposed data center projects. It centers on local land-use and permitting decisions, with the political response around those proposals also in view.
The council advanced the Piedmont data center plan but put off the final vote after residents pushed back. The filing points to a local siting fight with community opposition; it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project would make.
The piece is about a proposed data center in Bessemer and a local dispute over whether construction should keep going. It centers on permitting, city action, and what QTS has or has not handed over to reporters or officials about the project.


