Archive

A local group is using a lawsuit to try to pry loose city records about a Tesla data center in Austin. The piece is about transparency around a proposed infrastructure project and the public information the city has not released.

The piece is about a local official briefing Lincoln County commissioners on the first meeting of Nebraska's data center task force. It signals early state-level discussion of where data centers may go and what that could mean for county siting and utility planning, but the excerpt does not say any project was approved or named.

A local forum in Casper exposed that residents still lack basic information about a proposed data center and its likely effects. The piece is about community transparency around a specific project, and it does not say the filing has resolved the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

Europe and the UAE are said to be planning a proposed orbital data center with 50 connected computers and a shared model-selection layer for satellite-sensor data. The filing does not say what land, water, tax, or local utility commitments, if any, the project would require on Earth.

The piece is about what a county can bargain over when a data center is proposed, with the emphasis on local leverage rather than the operator’s pitch. It points to community-facing terms such as land use, permits, and likely utility or tax issues, but the excerpt does not say which specific deal points were actually on the table.

Church groups are asking Microsoft to commit a small share of data center costs, and the company has gone quiet instead of answering in public. The piece is about who should pay for a project’s water- and cooling-related costs, and what the developer has not said about that request.

The piece is about a data center project in Shippingport and the local reaction around it as construction begins. It points to siting and community conflict, but the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project actually carries.

The piece says MARA put down a large deposit and is revising a Texas data center agreement while the site is under audit. It points to a project-level financing and oversight issue, but the excerpt does not say what changed in the deal or what the audit found.

Google is testing a data center concept in space by sending AI chips aboard a SpaceX rocket. The piece is about an orbital infrastructure experiment, not a terrestrial site, and it does not describe land, water, tax, or utility commitments for a host community.

A developer has filed for a proposed 200,000-square-foot data center in Jessup. The filing points to a siting proposal in a local market and, with the source label, suggests water and cooling are part of the project’s public discussion; it does not say whether the site has approvals, what utilities would serve it, or what local costs or incentives would attach.

The piece says a Cincinnati member of Congress wants to bar local officials from signing nondisclosure agreements tied to data center deals. That points to the secrecy around siting and incentives, but the excerpt does not say which project is affected or whether any agreement has already been signed.

A firm has identified land in Research Triangle Park for a proposed data center campus and says the site could be expanded later. The filing or report, as given here, does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, power, water, or local incentive terms.

Memphis utility officials are asking residents to conserve water while data centers in the area face no specific water-use rules. The piece centers on the local water supply and the gap in public guidelines for new large users.

The piece is about a professor’s view of the health concerns tied to data centers, based on a Hartford Courant discussion of the controversy. It signals a local debate around community impacts, but the excerpt does not say whether the article adds project-specific facts about siting, power, water, or permits.

The piece is about the idea of putting data centers in orbit, framed as a feasibility question rather than a specific project filing. It does not describe a named site, host community, or commitments on land, power, water, or tax.

Ohio residents are pushing back against data center development, and pro-AI groups are trying to soften that opposition. The piece is about local community resistance and the public campaign around future data center siting in Ohio, not about a specific new project filing or utility commitment.

A local group is organizing a rally against tax breaks and other public incentives for big technology projects. The item points to community pushback over how much the host government is willing to grant, but it does not identify a specific project, host site, or incentive package in the excerpt provided.

Maryland is reviewing data center proposals through a new state task force. The piece appears to concern how the state will handle siting and public review of future projects, not a specific build commitment yet.

Onondaga County says a study on a proposed AI data center is close to done. The filing points to a public process around the project, but it does not spell out a site, a power deal, water use, tax terms, or whether the county will move forward.

The piece is about China putting AI compute in orbit on a satellite and using onboard processing to handle Earth-observation data faster. It is an orbital infrastructure story, not a project that commits a host site on land, water, tax, or power.

The piece is about a South Carolina data center and the gap between its projected water use and when that information reached the public. It concerns cooling demand, disclosure, and local oversight of a specific project.

The piece explains how land can be treated as "powered" only after grid connection work is far enough along, which fits the publication’s power and siting coverage. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, place, utility, or developer commitment beyond the general concept of grid connection stages.