Archive

Xcel has put forward a large-load tariff proposal that would change how data center power use is billed, with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission taking comment. The piece is about utility rates and regulation, not a specific data center project or siting decision.

Residents in Adelanto and the High Desert are opposing proposed data center amendments. The filing points to local community resistance around how the project would move forward, but it does not say whether any amendment was adopted or spell out the project's power, water, tax, or land commitments.

The piece says the Broadview-area project has entered an initial construction phase and that the work now includes roads and well development. That puts the story on land preparation and water use for a proposed data center site in Montana, while it does not say anything about power supply, tax terms, or public approvals.

A public poll in Montana finds broad voter opposition to new data centers. The piece is about local political resistance, not a specific project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.

The proposal is no longer just a geothermal project; it now also contemplates data centers at the Rangely site. The excerpt does not say whether the filing adds power commitments, water use, tax terms, land assembly, or approvals, so those details remain unstated.

The piece addresses a water-use claim around data centers in the Colorado River system. It says experts do not think data centers are the cause of the river cuts, which makes this a water-and-community story about blame and local impacts rather than a project filing or site-specific commitment.

This is about New Mexico officials and advocates pushing back on the state’s data center buildout, with the excerpt pointing to water and cooling as the main issue. It appears to cover how the boom would affect local resources and what policy response is being proposed, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved or what specific rules the plan would change.

A local energy company says data center proposals could be coming to Garfield County. The piece appears to be about possible siting interest and the local power and water implications for the county, but the excerpt does not say whether any project has been filed or approved.

The piece says a Nevada governor’s order would require new tax and resource terms for data centers. It concerns what a project host may need to give up in money and resource commitments, but the excerpt does not say which projects are covered or what exact obligations were added.

Calexico has made its ban on data centers permanent, which is a siting and community decision for the city. The excerpt does not say whether any specific project was proposed there, what prompted the ban, or whether the city linked it to power, water, land-use, or tax terms.

This is about a Colorado data center bill and the pushback it is drawing over how ratepayer protections would work. The excerpt does not say which project or site is affected, or whether the bill changes land, water, taxes, or only utility costs.

Weld County cleared a zoning step for a proposed Global AI data center, which moves the project further into local siting review in Colorado. The excerpt does not say whether the project has power, water, tax, or land commitments, or what conditions the zoning approval includes.

Residents are suing over noise from a data center tied to Elon Musk. The piece centers on community opposition and a local quality-of-life dispute, not on the project’s power, water, tax, or land terms.

Tucson is preparing changes aimed at large water users, which puts the city’s water rules and local development costs in focus. The excerpt says advocates think the proposed changes do not go far enough, but it does not say which projects or users would be covered, or what standards would change.

The piece says a data center company is interested in possibly building a center in Humboldt County. On the record here, that is only a proposal-level siting story; it does not say the company has bought land, sought approvals, or committed power, water, or tax terms.

Aurora is considering setback rules that would limit how close data centers can be built to homes. The piece is about local siting and neighborhood impact, with the practical question being how the city balances project location against nearby residents.

Montana lawmakers are preparing a bill that would shift some of the cost and risk of data center power demand away from ordinary ratepayers. The filing points to state policy around who pays for large-load electricity service, but it does not say there is a specific project approval or a named site in this excerpt.

The piece is about a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order that would require grid operators to rewrite interconnection and tariff rules for large data center loads. It concerns how new data center demand is handled on the power side, not a specific site, land deal, or water commitment.