Archive

Goochland County Court is set to consider how data center land use should be handled locally. The filing points to a land-use dispute, but it does not say whether the county will approve, reject, or change any specific project.

San Jose is weighing draft standards for data center development, and the reporting says those standards are not strong enough. The piece is about local zoning and regulation around where data centers can be built, and what the city is or is not requiring of future projects.

A White County judge voided the rezoning that had cleared farmland for a proposed data center in Wolcott. The filing says the project is halted at the land-use stage and does not say anything about power, water, tax terms, or whether the developer has another site.

Plymouth Township is weighing a data center proposal in a zoning hearing that drew opposition. The filing points to a local siting fight and community pushback, but does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms the project would commit to.

The piece says Harris County has many data centers and little authority to control where they go or how they operate. It points to a local governance gap around regulation, with the focus on the county and the facilities already there.

Georgia's 100-megawatt regulatory threshold, not the state's tax abatement fight, now determines whether ratepayers are shielded from a data center's power costs.

Georgia's 100-megawatt regulatory threshold, not the state's tax abatement fight, now determines whether ratepayers are shielded from a data center's power costs.

Burrillville is moving ahead with a water infrastructure choice while stopping short of a local data center ban. The piece is about a local siting and community decision in Rhode Island, not a proposed project filing with technical details, so it says more about town policy than about a specific host commitment to power, water, tax, or land.

The piece is about local zoning changes and moratoriums affecting proposed U.S. BESS and data center projects. It concerns siting and regulation, with community opposition in the background, but the headline does not specify a particular project, host, or financial commitment.

Residents near the proposed Massillon data center are raising concerns about what the project could bring to a school area. The excerpt does not say what the filing commits on power, water, taxes, land, or approvals, only that local opposition is being voiced.

Stafford County delayed a hearing on a proposed data center project after county staff recommended denial. The filing points to siting, local review, and resident opposition, but it does not say the project was approved or give a final decision.

Van Buren Township is facing a decision on a proposed Google data center, with the story centered on local approval and opposition. The piece does not say the project’s water use, power commitments, tax package, or land terms in the excerpt provided.

The piece says proposed AI data centers on federal land have become a campaign issue in Nevada’s governor’s race. It points to land use and political conflict, but the excerpt does not say which sites are involved, what power or water commitments are tied to them, or whether any approvals have been made.

Data center opponents are expected to bring their case to Hubbard Township trustees at a public meeting. The piece is about local opposition and the township’s role in hearing it, not about a project approval or a technical filing.

Marathon County is weighing local rules that would affect where data centers, wind projects, and solar projects can go. The filing does not say what exact standards are in the draft or whether the board will approve them.

County supervisors are set to consider rules for data centers at a Tuesday morning meeting. The filing does not say what the regulations would cover, whether they would affect siting, power, water, taxes, or approvals, or whether any project is already proposed.

A zoning hearing for a proposed data center in Conshohocken is set to resume, which keeps the land-use decision for the project in play. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project carries, or how the zoning case will come out.

A developer has sued the Village of Indiantown over a proposed data center project, saying local officials are unlawfully blocking it. The dispute is about siting and local approval, not about the facility’s operating impacts, and the filing does not show that the project has cleared the village process.

The piece appears to cover local pushback and discussion around a proposed data center, with the main issue being siting rather than operations. It likely focuses on how the project would affect the Monroe area and what local officials or residents said about it.

South Bristol is preparing to discuss a proposed ban on data centers at a town hall meeting. The piece is about local opposition and possible zoning or regulatory action, but it does not say what project would be built, what land or utility commitments are at issue, or whether the ban has been adopted.

Loudoun County is pausing an effort tied to approvals for 15 data centers. The filing points to a local siting and approvals fight, but it does not say what specific land, power, water, tax, or utility commitments those projects carry.

Springfield residents are organizing an initiative petition to ban data centers in the city. The piece is about local opposition and the use of a ballot measure to block future siting, not about a specific project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.