Archive

The item says the county board is sending moratorium resolutions to the Planning Commission. That signals a local land-use pause and shows the county is considering limits on future development, but the excerpt does not say what kind of projects the moratorium would affect or what rules would change.

Vineland residents are preparing a lawsuit over a data center’s use of natural gas engines that were not permitted. The piece centers on local opposition, regulatory compliance, and the project’s on-site power setup in New Jersey.

The story is about a proposed Trenton data center and the tax revenue the local school district says it would generate. It is a local money-and-taxation piece tied to a specific project, but the excerpt does not say whether the deal includes abatements, land terms, power, or water commitments.

A judge ordered Talbot County to remove a data center text amendment from its zoning code. The piece is about local zoning control over where data centers can be approved in the county, not about power, water, or project financing.

The piece is about a public comment period tied to a proposed data center water supply near Broadview. It centers on water service for a specific project and the local review process, but the excerpt does not say who the developer is, how much water is involved, or whether any agreement has been approved.

The piece is about a proposed state bill that would set rules for data centers in order to shield nearby residents and utility customers. It points to public concerns over how large projects affect water use, utility bills, and local oversight, but the excerpt does not say which project or county is directly involved.

A South Shore town has put a hold on data center development, which puts local siting and zoning decisions at the center of the story. The piece appears to focus on what the pause means for future approvals and for residents weighing the project locally.

The piece is about local opposition in Culpeper to data center development and the push for a moratorium. It affects county land-use decisions and the siting of future projects, but the excerpt does not say anything about a specific project committing land, power, water, or tax terms.

Irondale’s mayor is saying the city will not impose a ban on data centers and will instead look at regulations. The piece is about local siting rules and how the city plans to control future projects, but it does not say what specific requirements are being considered.

Residents in Alliance, Ohio are opposing a proposed data center and pushing back on the rules around it. The piece is about local community resistance and the siting and regulation questions around a specific project.

The piece is about how Memphis City Council members voted on proposed data center projects. It centers on local land-use and permitting decisions, with the political response around those proposals also in view.

The council advanced the Piedmont data center plan but put off the final vote after residents pushed back. The filing points to a local siting fight with community opposition; it does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project would make.

The piece is about a proposed data center in Bessemer and a local dispute over whether construction should keep going. It centers on permitting, city action, and what QTS has or has not handed over to reporters or officials about the project.

This piece covers a Maryland Republican calling for a permanent state ban on hyperscale data centers, which is a policy and siting fight rather than a project filing. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, site, power deal, water commitment, or local approval outcome.

The piece is about a proposed data center in East Whiteland and a new legal challenge tied to local opposition. It signals risk to the siting process, but the excerpt does not say what claims the lawsuit threat raises or whether any approvals, land, power, or water commitments have changed.

Residents in Ferguson are organizing a petition to force the city to repeal approval for a data center or send the question to voters. The piece is about local opposition and the use of direct political pressure over a proposed project, not about the operator’s finances or technical buildout.

The piece concerns a public forum in Southwest Virginia where data center developers are expected to face questions from local residents and officials. It appears to focus on community discussion around a proposed data center project, not on a committed power, water, tax, or land deal.

Upper Burrell planners approved local rules for data centers in a 5-0 vote and kept the gas requirement in place. The filing does not say whether any specific project is proposed, how much land is involved, or what the rules would commit the township to on power, water, taxes, or infrastructure.

Onondaga County is still studying whether data centers fit locally, while County Executive Ryan McMahon is pressing Albany to end a tax exemption that affects their economics. The filing says nothing about a specific project, site, or deal terms beyond the tax question.

Calvert County officials were not brought into a proposed Constellation-Amazon power arrangement tied to Calvert Cliffs. The piece is about local political pushback and the lack of consultation around an energy deal that could affect the county.

The piece is about Graham looking for safeguards around a proposed data center after talks over a county tax abatement fell apart. It concerns local tax treatment and the county’s role in what gets built, but the excerpt does not say the project’s size, site, power needs, water use, or whether any agreement was actually reached.

A developer withdrew a proposed data center plan in the Philadelphia suburbs after public opposition. The filing signals a siting fight that ended before approval, and it does not say the project will move forward elsewhere or give details on power, water, tax, or land commitments.