Archive

Amazon is addressing a change in its stance on where future data centers may be developed in Northern Virginia. The story appears to center on siting and local development issues, with the details of any power, water, or land commitments not stated in the excerpt.

This piece covers a Maryland Republican calling for a permanent state ban on hyperscale data centers, which is a policy and siting fight rather than a project filing. The excerpt does not identify a specific project, site, power deal, water commitment, or local approval outcome.

The piece is about a proposed data center in East Whiteland and a new legal challenge tied to local opposition. It signals risk to the siting process, but the excerpt does not say what claims the lawsuit threat raises or whether any approvals, land, power, or water commitments have changed.

The piece says Gradiant will supply water for a proposed data center in West Texas. It does not say how much water the project will use, where it will be built, or what other local commitments or approvals are involved.

Residents in Ferguson are organizing a petition to force the city to repeal approval for a data center or send the question to voters. The piece is about local opposition and the use of direct political pressure over a proposed project, not about the operator’s finances or technical buildout.

Microsoft has filed paperwork for a proposed data center campus in Floyd County, Georgia. The filing points to a siting and local-approval story; the excerpt does not say what land, power, water, tax, or zoning commitments are included, or whether any were already secured.

Dixon's City Council unanimously adopted a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center and battery storage applications, even with no project yet filed.

Stafford supervisors voted to condemn land for a pipeline tied to reuse water for a data center. The filing says the county is using land condemnation to support water infrastructure for the project, but it does not say who will pay for the pipe, how much water the data center will use, or whether the site has other approvals in hand.

The piece says the Leola data center’s conditional use permit request has been tabled again. That points to an unresolved siting and zoning step, but the excerpt does not say what the applicant asked for beyond the permit or why the delay happened.

A developer withdrew a proposed data center plan in the Philadelphia suburbs after public opposition. The filing signals a siting fight that ended before approval, and it does not say the project will move forward elsewhere or give details on power, water, tax, or land commitments.

Texas counties are moving to tighten groundwater rules as data center growth adds pressure to local water supplies. The piece is about local regulation, water demand, and the siting consequences for projects that rely on groundwater access.

Residents in Goochland are still pushing back over a proposed data center project in the West Creek area, while a judge considers whether to dismiss the related TOD lawsuit. The filing points to an ongoing siting and legal dispute; it does not say whether the project has secured power, water, tax, or land commitments.

The piece is about Geronimo Power contesting a proposed moratorium before a vote in Harmony Township. It is a local siting and zoning fight, but the excerpt does not say what commitments the project makes on land, power, water, or taxes, only that the developer is pushing back.

Digital Realty is proposing a large data center campus in Indiana. The filing as given points to a siting and money story, but it does not say whether the project has secured land, utility power, water, tax treatment, or local approvals.

The piece says a proposed AI data center tied to a San Francisco mall is running into power and permitting obstacles. It points to siting and utility constraints, but the excerpt does not say what power source, water use, tax deal, or land transaction is actually in place.

Loudoun County ended plans for a proposed Amazon data center after community opposition. The filing, as described here, does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments were tied to the project or what specific concessions were under discussion.

The piece is about a proposed data center project in Yukon, Oklahoma, and a reported change in its water plan. It centers on what the developer does or does not plan to use for cooling, which affects local water demand and utility planning.

Parkland’s local government is lining up against a proposed data center sited across from a high school. The filing points to community opposition and a zoning or siting dispute, but it does not say the project has been approved or built, and it does not mention any power, water, tax, or land commitment terms.

Soluna and Applied Digital are proposing a 50-megawatt AI data center in Texas. The filing as given does not say what land, power, water, tax, or local approvals are attached to the project, only that the plan exists.

Natrona County and Prometheus Hyperscale are discussing a new AI complex and whether it can avoid state-level review. The filing points to a siting and regulatory issue in Wyoming, but the excerpt does not say what power, water, tax, or land commitments the project has made.

Milwaukee has moved to pause data center projects, joining other Wisconsin cities that have put temporary holds on this kind of development. The filing says nothing about a specific site, power deal, water use, tax package, or developer proposal.

Boone gave site-plan approval for two proposed data center buildings. The filing does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms are attached, and it does not describe any community objections or other approvals beyond the site plan.