Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 6 of 9.
Landry's golf-course-to-data-center water ratios shift between 28 and 40, but neither matches the actual dollar figures parishes have negotiated.
Landry's golf-course-to-data-center water ratios shift between 28 and 40, but neither matches the actual dollar figures parishes have negotiated.
Fort Smith is considering tighter local rules on data centers, which puts the issue in the city’s zoning and regulatory process. The excerpt does not say what standards would change, which projects would be affected, or whether any specific site, utility demand, water use, or tax deal is involved.
Loudoun County officials are preparing changes to local data center rules while facing the prospect of lawsuits. The piece is about zoning and legal pressure over how much more data center development the county will allow.
Local lawyers are challenging a subpoena tied to the Birmingham data center fight and are framing it as overreach. The piece appears to concern legal maneuvering around opposition to the project, not the project’s power, water, land, or tax terms.
The piece appears to examine the claims behind data center job creation against the public ledger of tax abatements and other incentives. It is about what a proposed or built project costs the community on the money side, not just the employment promises attached to it.
Osceola County is pausing consideration of large-scale AI data center applications until a state study is finished. The piece concerns local siting and regulatory review, and it does not say that any project was approved, denied, or tied to a specific power, water, tax, or land deal.
The piece is about a proposed data center property sale in Birmingham and the public scrutiny around the mayor's family connection to it. It centers on transparency and local opposition, not on a power, water, tax, or land commitment that has been fully described in the excerpt.
The headline says a Delaware lawmaker is filing bills aimed at more transparency around data centers. The excerpt does not say which projects, communities, or disclosures the bills would affect, so the filing is about oversight rather than a specific site commitment.
The piece focuses on residents living near a proposed AI data center in Vineland and the local burdens they say come with it. The excerpt points to community conflict and concerns about noise and water, but it does not lay out the project’s full commitments or any final approvals.
The piece is about local opposition to a proposed data center in Alabama’s Black Belt and what it would mean for the people near the site. It centers on siting and community conflict, with the title signaling a rural Alabama host community rather than a company story.
A fabricated data center image is circulating in St. Mary’s, which points to confusion or misinformation around a local project discussion. The piece appears to be about community debate and transparency, not a commitment of land, power, water, or tax terms.
Alabama has a new data center law in force, and the piece frames it through the effect on electricity bills rather than on any specific project site. The filing as given does not identify a particular developer or host community, and it does not say what the law changes in detail beyond its expected impact on power costs.
The agreement approved by HW&L would have the data center pay for studies tied to the project, which is a community cost linked to a proposed facility. The excerpt does not say what the studies cover, whether the project is approved for construction, or any details on power, water use, tax breaks, or land commitments.
The piece is about Fort Meade officials visiting Virginia data center sites to learn from a major hosting region. It points to interest in water and cooling demands tied to data center development, but the excerpt does not say the trip committed Fort Meade to any project, policy, or utility deal.
Georgetown council voted to draft an ordinance that would ban data centers, which puts the project question squarely in local siting and zoning hands. The excerpt does not say whether the ordinance would pass, what land is involved, or whether any developer has formally applied.
The piece is about DartPoints' response to local opposition to a proposed data center in Lexington. It points to community pushback and the siting fight, but the excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, tax terms, or land.
The piece is about backlash to Virginia data center siting, with the focus on public opposition and what it says about how people are responding to those projects. It does not describe a specific new project commitment on land, power, water, or tax terms in the excerpt provided.
The piece is about local protest against Project Midspan. It points to community opposition to a proposed project, but the excerpt does not say what the project is, where it would be built, or what commitments it carries for power, water, tax, or land.
A South Carolina law firm is asking regulators to revisit a decision tied to a proposed Spartanburg data center. The piece is about the legal and regulatory fight around siting a project in the state, and it does not say the project has been approved, built, or that the filing changed any project terms.
The Kentucky legislature is holding a listening session on data centers, which puts the issue in the public record but does not itself approve or deny a project. The excerpt does not say whether any specific site, utility deal, zoning action, or tax package is on the table.
Palm Beach County neighbors near Mar-a-Lago voted for a local ban that would block or limit a data center project the White House opposes. The filing does not say whether the proposal is for a specific site, how much land or power it would use, or what the developer has committed on water, taxes, or other local terms.
A firm has identified land in Research Triangle Park for a proposed data center campus and says the site could be expanded later. The filing or report, as given here, does not say whether the project has approvals, financing, power, water, or local incentive terms.
Residents are suing over noise tied to a proposed Southaven data center, which puts the local project’s community impacts and legal fight in view. The excerpt does not say what the filing seeks beyond the noise complaint or what project commitments, if any, were made on power, water, tax, or land.
Memphis utility officials are asking residents to conserve water while data centers in the area face no specific water-use rules. The piece centers on the local water supply and the gap in public guidelines for new large users.