Archive
(749 Total Articles)Page 6 of 8.
A Nebraska tribe says a proposed data center would threaten its water rights. The filing, as described here, raises a water and community dispute tied to a specific site, but it does not say what the project would draw, where it would be built, or whether any approvals or utility agreements are in place.
A local group is using a lawsuit to try to pry loose city records about a Tesla data center in Austin. The piece is about transparency around a proposed infrastructure project and the public information the city has not released.
Zone Frontier has leased land for a proposed Texas data center campus that could reach 500 MW. The filing as given does not say what power, water, tax, or land-use commitments are in place beyond the land lease itself.
This is about local opposition to a proposed data center in Archer County, with a state lawmaker joining residents in that objection. The excerpt does not say what the project would commit on power, water, tax, or land, or whether any filing or developer details were presented.
Developers are discussing a proposed data center near Mahomet and saying it would not add to local energy or water demand. The filing or reporting leaves open community concern about that claim and does not show a final approval or a committed utility deal.
A local forum in Casper exposed that residents still lack basic information about a proposed data center and its likely effects. The piece is about community transparency around a specific project, and it does not say the filing has resolved the project’s power, water, tax, or land commitments.
The piece appears to be about a proposed data center project in Amber, Oklahoma, and the claim that it is unlikely to be stopped. The excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, taxes, or land, or what objections, approvals, or legal steps are driving that conclusion.
Church groups are asking Microsoft to commit a small share of data center costs, and the company has gone quiet instead of answering in public. The piece is about who should pay for a project’s water- and cooling-related costs, and what the developer has not said about that request.
A California firm says it intends to build a data center at Chouteau, Oklahoma. The filing excerpt does not say what land has been assembled, what power or water supply has been arranged, or whether the proposal has local approvals.
The piece says MARA put down a large deposit and is revising a Texas data center agreement while the site is under audit. It points to a project-level financing and oversight issue, but the excerpt does not say what changed in the deal or what the audit found.
The piece appears to focus on how data center growth is affecting local water use and cooling needs. It points to questions about resource pressure on the community rather than a specific project approval or financing deal.
A Texas utility looked at gas as the only power option for a proposed Meta data center tied to a large project value. The piece is about how that proposed load would be powered and what the utility considered, not about the data center being built or any final utility deal.
A data center developer is seeking to use a former healthcare business site in Pennsylvania for a new project. The filing, as described, only shows a proposed land reuse and does not say what power, water, tax, or zoning commitments the project would bring.
The story says Oracle’s Project Jupiter is running into access and permitting problems tied to the pipeline and water system it would need. It describes a project-level siting and utility issue, but the excerpt does not say what permits are missing, who controls the pipeline, or whether any final approval has been denied.
A developer has filed for a proposed 200,000-square-foot data center in Jessup. The filing points to a siting proposal in a local market and, with the source label, suggests water and cooling are part of the project’s public discussion; it does not say whether the site has approvals, what utilities would serve it, or what local costs or incentives would attach.
A developer is asking a judge to overturn Pahrump's ban on a data center, and the dispute centers on water. The filing does not say the ban is already gone; it says the developer is trying to get it tossed in court.
Texas attorney general Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into a large set of proposed data center developments in Smith County and other nearby counties. The filing points to regulatory and local-government scrutiny around siting and the public impacts of those projects, but it does not specify the power, water, tax, or land commitments for each proposal.
Memphis utility officials are asking residents to conserve water while data centers in the area face no specific water-use rules. The piece centers on the local water supply and the gap in public guidelines for new large users.
A groundwater district official says data center development in the area is still a year or two away. The piece appears to be about local water oversight and the timing of a proposed project, not a committed build.
The piece is about how Anthropic and OpenAI are widening the map of AI data center projects and how the financing for those projects is becoming more difficult. It points to money and infrastructure questions around where the facilities go and how they get funded.
Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.
Water disputes in Fayette and Newton counties are shaping how Georgia officials, including an Effingham delegation, scrutinize a $20 billion data center project.
Residents in Dinwiddie County are objecting to a proposed data center near their homes because they fear impacts on wildlife, water, and daily life. The filing shown here points to a local siting fight and community concern, but it does not say what power source, water commitment, tax deal, or land assembly terms the project would use.
The forum is about how data centers in Nebraska affect electricity use and water demand. It points to a community discussion of project impacts rather than a specific build decision or financing deal.
This piece appears to be about a proposed OpenAI data center near Belmont Glen in Effingham County, Georgia, and the local concerns that come with a new facility next door. The excerpt points to water and cooling as the immediate issue, with the broader project likely affecting nearby residents through land use and community impacts, though the filing details are not provided here.