Archive

The piece is about DOE pushing PJM to make sure other ratepayers are protected if large loads, including data centers, drive up grid costs. It centers on how those costs are assigned through interconnection and tariffs rather than on a specific project site.

The piece concerns support for a bill that would remove a tax exemption for data centers. It is about state tax treatment of data center projects, not a specific build or siting decision.

Duke Energy has reached an agreement on a large-load tariff that would set terms for data centers in North Carolina. The filing matters for how new projects connect to power and who pays for the added grid cost, but the excerpt does not say what the tariff contains or which projects would use it.

The piece appears to focus on how new California data center laws could affect the planned Rucci project. It points to a regulatory and project-level change, but the excerpt does not say what specific commitments the project makes on land, power, water, or tax terms.

Loudoun County supervisors delayed a discussion about whether some data center projects should be treated as grandfathered under older rules. The piece is about local zoning and approval questions that affect what can still be built in Loudoun County.

The piece says Clean Cloud’s data center plan no longer has a Mahomet path and would have to move through county approval if the company keeps going. It points to siting and local rule, with the community and zoning process now central to whether the project advances.

Austin Water is proposing new rules for large water users, with the stated focus on data centers and other high-impact customers. The filing points to local water-supply management and regulation, but the excerpt does not say whether any specific project is approved, how much water is involved, or what costs would fall on hosts or ratepayers.

Pierce Township residents are weighing how the township should regulate data centers, which puts the story in the local zoning and community lane. The excerpt does not say what specific rules they want, whether any developer has proposed a project there, or what the township will actually adopt.

Duke Energy and data center operators are setting new rules for how very large electric users will be served in North Carolina. The piece is about power terms and utility policy, not a specific site buildout, and it does not say what land, water, tax, or construction commitments, if any, are attached to a project.

The piece is about New York Governor Kathy Hochul defending a pause on data center permits after a farm roundtable in the Hudson Valley. It concerns siting and regulation, with a local community and land-use angle, but it does not say a specific project has been approved or built.

A North Dakota lawmaker is discussing a data center committee as a possible route to future legislation. The piece appears to be about policy review and possible state rules, not a specific project commit to land, power, water, or tax terms.

A permit filing puts a dollar figure on the Memphis data center phase but does not by itself describe the project’s full power, water, or land commitments. The filing appears to be part of a larger buildout in Memphis, with the public record here limited to the permit amount and the project location.

The piece is about how data center construction is changing local property tax assessment work, which points to the tax burden and valuation disputes that can follow a new build. It does not describe a specific project site in the excerpt, so the filing appears to be a broad look at the tax side of the boom rather than a single host community decision.

MISO is proposing a faster study path for large loads and new generation on its grid. The filing matters for projects that need interconnection in the Midwest, but the excerpt does not say which specific projects or customers would be affected.

Landry's golf-course-to-data-center water ratios shift between 28 and 40, but neither matches the actual dollar figures parishes have negotiated.

California has adopted a new regulatory framework aimed at data centers, which puts the project type into a clearer state policy lane. The excerpt does not say whether this changes siting, power access, water use, taxes, or any specific project already underway.

Fort Smith is considering tighter local rules on data centers, which puts the issue in the city’s zoning and regulatory process. The excerpt does not say what standards would change, which projects would be affected, or whether any specific site, utility demand, water use, or tax deal is involved.

An eastern Nebraska village has adopted a permanent ban on data centers. The piece is about local siting and community opposition, with a zoning and regulation result that blocks future projects in that place.

Town leaders in Lansing are moving toward a ban on data centers after residents pushed back in public. The filing says the dispute is about whether this kind of project should be allowed there, but it does not describe any specific site, utility commitment, tax deal, or land transaction.

The tribes passed a ban on data centers, which is a local siting and regulatory move that can block future project proposals on tribal land. The excerpt does not say whether any specific project was pending, what led to the ban, or whether it affects power, water, or tax terms.

Osceola County is pausing consideration of large-scale AI data center applications until a state study is finished. The piece concerns local siting and regulatory review, and it does not say that any project was approved, denied, or tied to a specific power, water, tax, or land deal.

The headline says a Delaware lawmaker is filing bills aimed at more transparency around data centers. The excerpt does not say which projects, communities, or disclosures the bills would affect, so the filing is about oversight rather than a specific site commitment.