Archive

The proposed Wayne County data center was withdrawn after residents turned out at City Hall. The filing does not say whether the project had specific power, water, tax, or land commitments beyond the planned site and cost.

Residents in Walls are objecting to a proposed data center at a public listening session. The excerpt points to local community pushback and a siting dispute; it does not say whether the project has approvals, what power or water commitments it would make, or what the developer offered.

The project is described as a proposed data center buildout in Pittsylvania County with 21 buildings and very large stated power and water needs. The filing or excerpt does not say what tax abatements, land terms, utility agreements, or other community concessions are attached, if any.

Alcoa is selling a former smelter site in New York that is being marketed for data center development. The filing as described does not say what power, water, tax, or land-use commitments would come with any eventual project, only that the site sale could enable that use.

Archbald council is scheduled to vote on a proposed data center campus, which puts the project’s local siting and approval process in focus. The excerpt does not say what commitments, if any, the developer has made on power, water, tax treatment, or land use terms beyond the vote itself.

5C is moving ahead with a large expansion of its Memphis data center project. The filing points to a proposed AI-focused facility and signals continued buildout in Memphis, but it does not say in this excerpt what new power, water, tax, or land commitments are attached to the expansion.

A local group held a protest outside the Somerset County courthouse against a proposed data center. The excerpt does not say which project is involved, what site changes are proposed, or whether the county is considering any approval, permit, or utility commitment.

Concord is weighing a proposed micro data center, with the question centered on whether the city will grant tax treatment or other local approval. The available text does not say what the project would consume in power or water, or whether any deal terms have been set.

The filing points to a possible data center project in Warrick County, but the excerpt does not say which company is behind it or what commitments it would bring on land, power, water, taxes, or jobs. It is only a notice of a proposed site under a project name, so the community impact is still unspecified.

A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.

A $24,000 donation, a leaked text, and a federal approval already in motion are fueling a Maryland gubernatorial fight over TeraWulf's Morgantown data center conversion.

A data center is proposed for a site off Michigan Avenue in Inkster. The filing excerpt does not say how the project would use power or water, what land controls or approvals it needs, or what the developer is asking the city to commit.

Oregon has paused most new permits for data centers until July, which puts a temporary brake on siting decisions in the state. The piece also says Amazon is warning that large sums of planned investment could be at risk, but it does not say which projects are covered or what specific permit rules are changing.

New Jersey towns are using local bans to block data center development, and the piece tracks how that opposition is spreading across the state. It is about siting and community pushback, with a clear local land-use and zoning angle; it does not say anything about a specific project’s power draw, water use, tax terms, or a permit decision for one named site.

Chester County residents are organizing to push back on, or reshape, proposed housing and data center development. The piece is about local opposition and the land-use fight around where these projects would go and what that means for the community.

The piece says local bans and moratoriums have slowed only a small number of US data center projects, while most planned capacity still appears set to move ahead. It frames the issue as a siting and community opposition story, not a change in power, water, tax, or land commitments for any specific project.

The piece appears to examine how much secrecy surrounds proposed Wisconsin data center deals, using nondisclosure agreements as the central issue. It points to a community and transparency fight around data center siting, but the excerpt does not say which projects are involved or what commitments they make on land, power, water, or tax terms.

The piece is about a New Jersey town revisiting its stance on a possible AI data center. It centers on local siting and community opposition, with the public process and any project details still only at the proposal stage.

Loudoun County says its board approved a process that could pause applications for data centers and substations under legislative review. The piece is about local siting and zoning control over proposed projects, not a specific build outcome.

Goochland County Court is set to consider how data center land use should be handled locally. The filing points to a land-use dispute, but it does not say whether the county will approve, reject, or change any specific project.

A White County judge voided the rezoning that had cleared farmland for a proposed data center in Wolcott. The filing says the project is halted at the land-use stage and does not say anything about power, water, tax terms, or whether the developer has another site.

Plymouth Township is weighing a data center proposal in a zoning hearing that drew opposition. The filing points to a local siting fight and community pushback, but does not say what power, water, tax, or land terms the project would commit to.