Archive

ComEd's deposit and screening rules for data centers are pushing Midwest regulators toward similar large-load tariffs, though each state is building its own version.

ComEd's deposit and screening rules for data centers are pushing Midwest regulators toward similar large-load tariffs, though each state is building its own version.

Alabama has a new data center law in force, and the piece frames it through the effect on electricity bills rather than on any specific project site. The filing as given does not identify a particular developer or host community, and it does not say what the law changes in detail beyond its expected impact on power costs.

Milwaukee’s plan commission gave initial backing to a pause on new data center development. The filing points to local siting and zoning control, but it does not say which projects would be affected or whether the pause would become final.

This piece appears to explain how Governor Moore’s data center order could affect future development in Montgomery County, with a focus on cooling and water-related implications. It looks at a state-level directive as it filters down to a local host community and what the county may be asked to accept or review.

Pennsylvania legislators are considering limits on how data center projects use nondisclosure agreements and whether they can claim public utility status. The piece is about state-level rules that would shape how projects are negotiated and what obligations or protections they can claim.

Georgetown council voted to draft an ordinance that would ban data centers, which puts the project question squarely in local siting and zoning hands. The excerpt does not say whether the ordinance would pass, what land is involved, or whether any developer has formally applied.

The piece is about a local official briefing Lincoln County commissioners on the first meeting of Nebraska's data center task force. It signals early state-level discussion of where data centers may go and what that could mean for county siting and utility planning, but the excerpt does not say any project was approved or named.

The piece is about DartPoints' response to local opposition to a proposed data center in Lexington. It points to community pushback and the siting fight, but the excerpt does not say what the project commits on power, water, tax terms, or land.

The piece is about what a county can bargain over when a data center is proposed, with the emphasis on local leverage rather than the operator’s pitch. It points to community-facing terms such as land use, permits, and likely utility or tax issues, but the excerpt does not say which specific deal points were actually on the table.

The piece says the governor nominee would issue a moratorium on data centers if elected. That makes it a siting and regulation story in New Mexico, with the local political fight centered on whether new projects should be paused.

A South Carolina law firm is asking regulators to revisit a decision tied to a proposed Spartanburg data center. The piece is about the legal and regulatory fight around siting a project in the state, and it does not say the project has been approved, built, or that the filing changed any project terms.

Residents in Upper Burrell are organizing around local rules for a proposed data center. The piece centers on siting and community opposition in a Pennsylvania fracking area, and it does not say the project has secured approvals or committed specific power, water, tax, or land terms.

A Michigan survey found residents have strong views about data centers. The piece is about public reaction to proposed data center development, which affects community acceptance and local siting politics rather than a specific power, water, or tax deal.

The Kentucky legislature is holding a listening session on data centers, which puts the issue in the public record but does not itself approve or deny a project. The excerpt does not say whether any specific site, utility deal, zoning action, or tax package is on the table.

Palm Beach County neighbors near Mar-a-Lago voted for a local ban that would block or limit a data center project the White House opposes. The filing does not say whether the proposal is for a specific site, how much land or power it would use, or what the developer has committed on water, taxes, or other local terms.

The story says Oracle’s Project Jupiter is running into access and permitting problems tied to the pipeline and water system it would need. It describes a project-level siting and utility issue, but the excerpt does not say what permits are missing, who controls the pipeline, or whether any final approval has been denied.

East Whiteland officials adopted a new data center ordinance after residents pushed back against the project already under construction there. The filing is about local land-use control and community opposition; it does not say what the project will draw in power or water, or what tax terms, if any, are attached.

The piece is about a local ballot fight over Butte’s proposed data center initiative and the state court action that put it back before voters. It concerns community opposition and the legal process around whether the initiative stays on the ballot.

The headline points to a Senate fight over AI data-center policy, with Democrats split over how to handle it. The excerpt does not say what concrete project, site, utility commitment, or local approval is at issue.

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into a large set of proposed data center developments in Smith County and other nearby counties. The filing points to regulatory and local-government scrutiny around siting and the public impacts of those projects, but it does not specify the power, water, tax, or land commitments for each proposal.

A groundwater district official says data center development in the area is still a year or two away. The piece appears to be about local water oversight and the timing of a proposed project, not a committed build.